we did BLW too... and for dd2 it meant that she ate what food she wanted, when she wanted, which was around, ooh, 6 months and a day or so...
I restricted drinks for her 9other than bf, which she had on demand) but she had other ideas and would regularly swipe herr sisters drinks in prefrence to bf
I do agree that a lot of attitudes need changing wrt bf in this country, but I don't think that dismissing several people's expereiences of bf with remarks such as
"It was more likely to be nursing strike - v common at that age IME. Did you ever get any proper support with it?"
"Most infants - given the chance - will start nursing again once the mature milk comes in (assuming they haven't lost their ability to nurse)"
"I know many people feel their babies self weaned - like thesuburbandryad, I wonder in how many instances this self weaning is actually a nursing strike (a term most mothers have never heard) which is met with a sigh of relief by a mum who actually would quite like to move on from bf and is welcoming of what seems like a natural chance to stop"
is helpful at all. It does rather read as "of course, if you did it all exactly as we have done, your children would still be bf at 12 months/18 months/whatever.
Please do just take on board, that I too bf on demand, did not refuse night feeds, BLW (which of course, puts the baby in control of what and when they want) and did not go back to work, and yet dd2 still practically self weaned at 10 months, and it took a lot of hard work over several months to keep her going with one feed a day.