WWW, you think like that, elaroo clearly doesn't, or she would have simply switched to bottle feeding.
I don't judge anyone. It is fine to think a mother's happiness is as important as her baby's health (I am inserting 'health' here, rather than happiness, as I don't think we can say for certain whether the baby would be happier on the bottle or not)...there may be many reasons in an individual's situation that result in this equation.
I pointed out that while the sentiments urging ellaroo to stop, to put her 'happiness' first and so on were well-meant. they were jumping to the conclusion that this was the only way to be. By the way, what's patronising about that???! I was acknowledging that you had ellaroo's interests at heart. If you 'believe them to be true' then you are putting your opinions up as fact.
My post pointed out that this is not the only way to be.
Of course women should be able to choose.
Breastfeeding is unique as a 'health choice' because it involves our bodies and our body image, and this is so loaded with politics, culture, history, emotional factors, that no one can make the choice for anyone else. It's also why it is pointless telling someone 'not to feel guilty' - those feelings come from inside and they don't stop just because someone else tells them to!
Lisa stopped feeling guilty (after a bad few days) because she weighed up everything and came to a conclusion that made sense in her own, individual, particular situation....that's all anyone can do.
We share insights and information here, not dogma, and on the whole we accept, as I do, that posts are well-meant. I do not accept that presupposing people's goodwill is patronising. It's just saying that mainly, we're good guys on here, even though we disagree from time to time