I began by feeling desperately sorry for the author of this piece.
She wanted to breastfeed, everybody around her was saying that she would be able to do it, she armed herself with information from literature available to her - basically, she was "going to breastfeed" and no other thought entered her head - why would it? This reminds me of Twinklemegan's thread about the bf literature all being a bit rosy and not talking about problems one might encounter.
Then she says she hated breastfeeding and I thought "oh, poor thing - what happened?" - she goes on to describe woeful support and I still feel sorry for her. She worked bloody hard to get bfeeding working for her and I admire her enormously for that.
However.
The slippery slope from "feeling very sorry for" to "calling an idiot" began at:
"What if secretly all women who have had kids know that breastfeeding is not what it is made out to be?"
Oh yes, it's really likely that all women who've bfed have done so unwillingly. Yes, you genius, you have it in one.
She goes on to drop in my estimation by feeling "picked on" at a large baby clinic - of COURSE HVs only remember the names of breastfed babies. It's in their HV manual "tell mums to offer formula at every slight hitch, or even just for the hell of it, get 'em on solids by 17 weeks at the latest and only remember the names of the breastfed ones".
Then "Times change though, and the formulas on the market are hopefully as close to what comes out of your boob, as they will ever be." Well, she's not wrong, I don't think - but not in the way she things she's right. They're no closer or further away than they'll ever be - they are what they are. They'll never be bmilk because it's not possible. Humans will never produce cows milk either. It's a meaningless statement.
The friends and relatives she's spoken to obviously have valid experiences to share - but I do wonder whether she spoke to anybody she knew who had bfed successfully - either because she doesn't know anyone, or because, in her seeming reluctance to hear anything positive about bfeeding, she didn't seek the opinions of those who may have had something nice to say about it. I don't know she did this, of course, I just wonder.
Then she really put the tin lid on my thinking she was an idiot by talking about breastfeeding being the only way acceptable to society to feed a baby.
HOW many women have been told their baby "must have formula" within hours of their birth?! I know I was - erroneously, as you'll all know, since I have mentioned it occasionally(!)
HOW many women are told their babies aren't "following a centile" and must be "given top-ups"? Or that they have unsatisfactory milk (perhaps due to a growth-spurting baby) and must do the same? Or all manner of myths (some of which she perpetuates in her article - like the what you eat makes your baby fussy one - which may be true in a minute percentage of babies, but is just not true for most women/babies).
Or all sorts of other "give formula and your baby will be fine, don't persist with this breastfeeding nonsense" message that SO many health professionals give out EVERY DAY to women who WOULD be able to breastfeed if they had decent support.
So that's why I think she's an idiot - because she's ranting at the wrong people. I can kind of see why she's doing it - it's maybe easier for her to believe that nobody enjoys breastfeeding than to wonder whether she might have been able to do it if she'd had better support.
Why isn't she asking why her health professionals weren't trained to support her? Why they didn't point her in the direction of a breastfeeding counsellor?
I've missed stuff out of this, I'm sure, but I hope the reasons I called her an idiot further down the thread are a bit clearer now.