'My issue is with his characterization as a liberal, a forward thinker, a moderniser...'
This is a straw man argument.
Anyone who has characterised him as liberal, etc., has projected their own hopes or maybe fears onto him.
It's not exactly fair to him to shoot him down for not being a liberal, or a moderniser, etc., when he himself has not claimed to be any of those things.
And it's not fair either, to shoot him down for not being a liberal or a moderniser or whatever else you think he should be without giving him any credit for saying he wants to see a significant shift in emphasis by the church, a shift he has tried to illustrate by many choices about his personal lifestyle, abode, ministry and personal outreach.