Claire Khaw
Why should anyone pay for the nappies of disabled children? What is the purpose of that?
I hope Cameron will treat this request for nappies for disabled children to be funded by the taxpayer with the contempt it deserves.
If you must have disabled children look after them at your own expense.
Claire Khaw
Pip, you are in a minority on Mumsnet, as you would expect. The majority of Mumsnet users spend their entire lives whingeing for more handouts.
Claire Khaw
These twats you refer to keep being born every day, don't they? Some of them are actually mentally disabled. Others just behave as if they are, but the gutless government is too scared to tell them where to go when they petition for more handouts.
Of course these disabled children have a right to life, but at the expense of their own single mother, usually.
What about this principle don't you understand, Shelly?
Claire Khaw
Look, I will be honest to you ladies and say that I would not bring up a disabled child. I would tell the midwife that I wouldn't mind if she accidentally dropped it on its head to save me from doing it myself.
Otherwise that child may just end up like the severely disabled child that hanged itself.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/disabled-girl-found-hanged-after-failings-1979 711.html... See more
or
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1268317/Michael-Gilbert-Luton-family-guilty-Bl ue-Lagoon-torture-murder.html
Sometimes, you have to be cruel to be kind.
Passing the parcel just prolongs its misery.
Claire Khaw
Actually, ladies, you could wash the nappies of your disabled children. That's what people did in the olden days. Environmentally friendlier too.
Saskia, I don't think these ladies find me dull.
Looking after the helpless may be maternal feelings bringing up the next generation, but it must be given with discrimination. ... See more
If it is indiscriminate it is just a perversion of the maternal instinct.
Male politicians are afraid to question or contradict these mums (whether they are good mothers or even married) but their power to burden the taxpayer needs to be seriously challenged.
There is no more money to fund more matriarchal degeneracy.
Claire Khaw
This is a discussion group, isn't it? How typical that so many women cannot have a rational discussion without getting vindictive.
Claire Khaw
Kelly, Lucy, Hazel, Inger: you all really do believe in free speech, don't you? NOT!
All right, I shouldn't have said I would ask the midwife to "accidentally on purpose drop it on its head". That was a bit frivolous, I should have said "dispose of it on my behalf so I don't have to do it myself."
I believe that in the old days, that is precisely what the midwife would do, discreetly. ... See more
Literature and social history would have ample evidence of this.
Claire Khaw
Pip, whether I have children or not or wish to or not is completely irrelevant to the wrongness of having your children (disabled or not) at anyone else's expense!
That is really the main point I am making.
Claire Khaw
Lucy, what I propose is only infanticide which attracts a lesser penalty.
I already hold the view that parents should have the power of life and death over their children.
This would do away with the need for Social Services having responsibility (at the expense of the taxpayer of course) having to pick up the pieces of bad social policy and bad parenting. ... See more
The labour and talents of these women in Social Services should be put to doing something more productive and constructive, like maybe looking after their own children and bringing them up properly
Claire Khaw
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide_Act
If any daughter of mine were to have a severely disabled child that would ruin her life if not her marriage, I would tell her to get rid of it.
There is even a ready-made defence provided you do it within the first 12 months of its life. ... See more
Actually, I do have a schoolfriend who allowed her marriage and her life to be ruined by bringing up such a disabled child.
her last post was 6 hours ago!