Background is this
Ds is almost 7. Last year top of his Father Christmas list was a nintendo ds which he got as his main present. Just lately his younger sibling who is 4 has been wanting to play on it too so they have had to take turns. (This currently nicely limits the time they each have and encourages sharing).
Top of Ds's Christmas list this year is an Xbox 360 then he wants a particular game for it but then he added "a red nintendo ds" to his list as the next item and is telling his younger sibling that "after Christmas you can have my old nintendo ds because I'm getting a new one".
Now I'm absolutely against two major electronic games console purchases at the same time like this but Dh seems to have no opinion one way or the other so I've brought it to the court of MN for opinions.
Funding the Christmas list is not a problem but it seems "greedy", for want of a better word, to me and I want to try and explain to ds why that letter will not be floating up the chimney in post combustion particles until it has been cut back by one games console.
Some of his classmates are getting TV's for their bedroom plus asking for mobile phones and there will no doubt be comparisons of who got what, in the playground in January.
Other stuff on his list is fairly small and doesn't cost much. He has also enquired politely after Father Christmas's health and added a PS "please don't forget the poor pepole (sic)"
What do you think, am I being unreasonable ?