Hi LDriver
It seems that I can't quite stay away from your problem, despite the origins of this thread.
(Please could others bear with me while I support LDriver, despite your views on my "other forum"?)
The teacher is anti-grammar, plain and simple. Any comment such as "grammar schools "attract a certain type of pupil" is rooted in beliefs that are sexist, racist, elitist, political, something, blah. Sometimes it can even indicate that the teacher is not confident in their own ability or does not understand the system locally. I have dealt with a few cases like this recently and I have been left feeling very angry at the attitudes of some "figures of authority".
Please do not rely on the school for further factual information about the 11+. If this teacher is representative of the school you will not receive reliable information.
I agree that the scores are very good for Year 5 and your child appears to be sufficiently able to attempt the 11+ if that is the way you want to go.
You posted the NVR score - which is excellent, but not scores for VR (Verbal Reasoning) or QR (Quantitative Reasoning). Were they lower, or did the school not conduct the tests? That does happen when resources are limited, because SATs will test VR and QR (via English & Maths) to some extent but NVR is not a part of the curriculum.
As the writing score is lower, at 4c, I would suggest that you focus on supporting your child in that area. Regardless of the 11+ it will hold him or her in good stead in future. Try Woodland Junior School's fabulous website for resources on almost anything.
LDriver, the last thing I wish to do is add to your worry about the 11+. If you would prefer me to just go back to my "dungeon" in the other place and leave you to get on with it here, please just say so.