scaredoflove - yep.
my point was exactly that though - which is why i commented that a statement would save bother with my tongue firmly in my cheek.
a far more efficient way of organising an sen child's education is to deal with the system that is in place, rather than hop around schools looking for a way to circumvent the system though.
my point was that a child with a disability needs a parent who engages with that system that is in place. and that means fighting for a statement if the child needs one, not hopping around schools at will and eventually taking a school to tribunal on discrimination grounds. if he is disabled enough to require a statement then blardy well take the lea to tribunal on those grounds. and do it years ago, not at last gasp to uni entrance.
i don't think the article is balanced at all, and i think it presents the mother in a poor light (i would prefer an accurate account of any lea battles to be documented ie an attempt to get a statement which sets out his sen, some discussion on the inability of the first school to appropriately deal with the apparently repeated bullying and isolation etc etc etc.)
if i was going to bother to give the grauniad an interview, i'd want it to look like i'd worked my socks off for my kid for the last ten years and been turned down by the lea at every step of the way, not that i'd hopped around and then taken the latest school to tribunal because i'd left it too late to do anything else.
and i'm not saying that's what she did - she might well have had an almighty battle for years with the lea, but that article makes it sound like she just didn't understand the system, which just makes it really galling for anyone who has fought the lea over statementing etc.
it's a shame, because your average punter will read it and think 'how appalling', whereas i read it and think 'i wish someone had told her years ago to fight for a statement'.