Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Original poster

To think someone should have rushed to help DS??

81 replies

sally78 · 15/02/2009 20:36

My DS is here they are everywhere but quite small still. We were at a baby group today and he was happily playing. I crossed the room to get his lunch and as I turned back to get him I saw him summersalt over a piece of furniture and fall on the floor! Lots of mums were sitting right next to him but not one moved they just looked and gasped!

I ran like the wind, he was very still for a few seconds, then let out a massive scream I felt terrible!!!!!!!!

I was upset that nobody got up, I was only about 6secs run away but it felt like forever whilst they just sat their drinking tea!

OP posts:
AitchTwoOh · 15/02/2009 22:09

i genuinely think that suspicious looks are in the eye of the beholder. as for grabbing a child... well, that parent was not gracious but perhaps it was panic speaking?

KingCanuteIAm · 15/02/2009 22:11

I didn't say I wouldn't help a lost or hurt child, I just wouldn't have in this case. The op was just across the room, she made it clear she saw what happened by shouting... I don't see that there would have been any need to interfere and scare the poor child more. I agree with the PFB comments.

As for a child with no parent around (lost or hurt) of course I would help - although I would aslo make sure I didn't leave said lost/hurt child with a bloke because I would be aware that the situation above can and does happen all too often.

muffle · 15/02/2009 22:13

Well possibly Aitch.

But if the roles were reversed I would be falling over with gratefulness and probably in floods of tears, so that's all I've got to compare it to. Panic doesn't have to make you abusive - it would just make me hyperventilate and cry.

muffle · 15/02/2009 22:14

And yes it's true I've now started talking about a slightly different situation - but yes I do also comfort children who have just hurt themselves with parent in the room.

AitchTwoOh · 15/02/2009 22:22

i once saved a wee kid from choking. his mother did not thank me, in fact she seemed a bit cross that i'd picked him up and yoinked him rather. i am SURE that was because of her panic, rather than the breakdown of society as we know it.

fishie · 15/02/2009 22:25

panic and guilt

muffle · 15/02/2009 22:26

There you go then! Shitty looks/seemed cross/whatever - eye of the beholder, or panic, you can see why people hold back.

AitchTwoOh · 15/02/2009 22:28

no, i absolutely can't. i didn't realise that i was doing it for the applause.

LuckySalem · 15/02/2009 22:31

Your not after the applause though Aitch - Your hoping that your not gonna get shouted at in the street/reported etc. THAT is why I hold back sometimes.

LuckySalem · 15/02/2009 22:32

But again not if child in immediate danger/alone.

AitchTwoOh · 15/02/2009 22:33

sure, of course. but it's the least likely explanation of the six second scenario the op describes.

StudentMadwife · 15/02/2009 22:38

my 3 yr old slipped my grip and ran out a store the other day towards the busy carpark, thankfully a couple were walking towards the entrance and grabbed him just before he managed to run across car park, i thanked them prefusely...if they hadnt he would v likely of been run over

AitchTwoOh · 15/02/2009 22:39

actually, this summer dd ran away in a supermarket, dh and i weere looking for her for EVER and some woman brought her back. i distinctly remember thinking i had not thanked her enough but i just wanted to hug dd, tbh.

nannynick · 15/02/2009 23:00

As a bloke, I do not intervene when it is a child not known to me. The risk is just too high for someone in my position, it takes very little to be accused of something I haven't done. I am pretty sure my liability insurer would not cover me in such an event as it isn't a child for whom I care.

StudentMadwife - if it had been a single male, rather than a couple... would your reaction have been any different?

I suspect not, as you had seen your child run out of the store... but if your child had just disappeared it could be a lot different, as Lucky mentioned earlier.

Does that mean that a women is more likely to help... I don't know these days - anyone can be accused of things, even when they are only trying to help.

At a toddler group things should be different, as many people there will be regularly going so will know many of the children. Alas some parents/carers are just too busy drinking their coffee/tea to notice what other children are doing, yet alone their own. Went to a toddler group on Friday where a child was throwing the toys at other children... the mother was ignoring it - and ignored it for some time. I tried speaking with the child, as I knew him as he had been cared for by a childminder friend of mine in the past but verbal alone wasn't going to stop him. I certainly didn't feel it was appropriate for me to physically attempt to stop him.

LuckySalem · 15/02/2009 23:09

NannyNick - I've seen this happen at my babygroup but LUCKILY we all know each other so we can tell the kid to stop doing that etc BUT I agree that they may not have been looking. I've watched a child trying to climb the wrong way up a slide and had to help before he fell back down again - mum didn't even notice the kid had left from her feet.

navyeyelasH · 15/02/2009 23:11

I'm a nanny and was inside the soft play with my charges last week anyway there was a little girl trapped inside the soft play crying because she couldn't get out. I helped her down by holding her hand and took her over to her mum.

The mum said "what have you done to her why is she crying" in a really aggressive way, I calmly said "I'm a nanny and was inside the softplay and I found your DC inside and brought her back as she was upset."

The mum replied, and I shit you not; "get your hands off my daughter this instant and leave us alone".

still think I'd help a kid out of the soft play though . I saw a man crash off his bike yesterday and a guy about 45ish in a suit on his mobile, stepped over him and carried on walking - I mean how rude is that!

navyeyelasH · 15/02/2009 23:23

Also just remembered another lost child about 2ish in the park last summer. He was walking around crying "mummy mummy" and no-one else moved. People were glancing nervously at each other though in the way that they do.

I just had a little chat with him and said don't worry we will find your mummy and the minute I crouched down to him the mum came over and said "excuse me what are you doing?". I tried to explain and she said, "he looks fine to me, why don't you mind your own business!"

Maybe I just have an annoying face?

lockets · 15/02/2009 23:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

CuddlyKelpie · 16/02/2009 00:03

See if I were a paedophile, I would not be in full view crouched down with the child. I think fastest possible exit is the name of their game.

For everyone else, if you see a person actually speaking to your child rather than trying to bundle them into a vehicle, or away howabout reviewing the situation and giving the person the benefit of the doubt? They might just have prevented your child from being approached my a pervert.

There are still good people out there you know.

KingCanuteIAm · 16/02/2009 00:21

Of course there are, but why would a paedophile attract attention by bundling a screaming child under hteir arm and legging it? Isn't it more likely they would behave like a concerned parent and try to talk to/ calm the chilld and get them to come willingly? Far less likely to attract attention/get spotted on CCTV etc with the advantage that, if the parent does show up, they can just say they were trying to help the child find the parent.

I agree that the vast majority of people who apporach lost young children are trying to help but I think it a little foolish to paint paedophiles as idiots who would be easy to spot by their unlikley actions.

CuddlyKelpie · 16/02/2009 00:47

I'm trying to explain why I and a lot of others feel unable to intervene when they see a child upset/hurt/alone.

If paedophiles were spottable we wouldn't have a problem would we?

A lot of people, including myself have been put off from intervening when a parent has treated them unreasonably after they have tried to do the right thing.

As a result I would probably not interfere. If that is 'foolish' to you then I say you are the fool.
If you welcome the abuse and potential litigation, more fool you. I don't and I won't.

AitchTwoOh · 16/02/2009 00:58

not so cuddly...

KingCanuteIAm · 16/02/2009 01:05

Beg your pardon Cuddly?

Go back, read my posts and yours then ...

Oh don't even bother, I can't be arsed

pinkyp · 16/02/2009 01:31

i would of helped the child up and passed over to the mum, i would prob been a bit shocked at 1st but would of tried to help. If it was 6 seconds the mum prob would of bet me but i would of asked if he was ok.
I dont think no mum or dad can be angry if you are helping their child up after they fall, obv unless u do sumthing stupid like pick him up by his clothes n say "get up silly" when he's obv hurt - not very sensitive etc then they might be annoyed.

cory · 16/02/2009 08:28

I would intervene if the mother was not around. But I would wait a split second to see if she did come running up.

Not because I am worried about being taken for a paedo- tough.

But simply because many small children are terrified of being touched by strangers- not because of any stranger danger stories but as a natural stage in their development. My niece would have been totally freaked out by being helped up by a strange mum at this age. And I know many children who would have been more frightened by the sudden intervention of another adult than by the initial fall.