Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Christa Pikes is awake and ‘talking’

930 replies

wouldntyouwanthelp · 06/10/2026 22:32

She’s out of the coma and talking to her lawyers. Aibu to think the state of Tennessee can’t possibly try to do the lethal injection again ? Surely not? People on Reddit are suggesting she might need an amputation of one of her arms because of how caustic pentobarbital is.

Christa Pike 'conscious and speaking at hospital' after failed execution in US
https://news.sky.com/share/13595950

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Paul2023 · 07/10/2026 18:13

crikeymikey123 · 06/10/2026 22:52

She's suffered enough.

Not as much as her poor victim who was tortured to death whilst pleading for her life.

She was 18 at the time , an adult.

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 18:13

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 18:11

The problem is that proving that the criminal act was committed doesn't necessarily amount to proof that the offence was committed where a mental element, usually intent, is required also. And when both have been established, there is still the possibility of challenge in relation to the appropriateness of the sentence.

Why let such fripperies get in the way of a damn good hanging ?

We could reintroduce the Newgate specials on the underground. People could dress up in period costume and recall the good old days of 1868 when you could get a tube to the jig and back, have a pie and pint and still have change from a shilling.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 18:15

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:54

Well, that's one way of showing yourself up, I suppose.

What's next? You're going to tell me vociferously that the sky is blue in case I try to claim it's pink?

I might do. 😂

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 18:15

BestZebbie · 07/10/2026 17:56

Surely anyone trained as a sniper for the army should have no qualms about executing someone legally and on command, given that is what they do for their day job?

The rules of engagement forbid shooting at someone who is helpless and unable to defend themselves, so I imagine it probably would cause them major qualms.

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 18:17

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 18:11

The problem is that proving that the criminal act was committed doesn't necessarily amount to proof that the offence was committed where a mental element, usually intent, is required also. And when both have been established, there is still the possibility of challenge in relation to the appropriateness of the sentence.

This is true. But that is going into another much longer conversation.

Paul2023 · 07/10/2026 18:18

dustabsorber · 07/10/2026 16:41

Can people honestly say that a 50-year-old is the same person they were when they were 18? Also, having been "executed" once, surely living with the fact that you are going to have to go through it again is cruel and unusual punishment in itself. She wasn't sentenced to be executed twice. This case is so unusual, it will end up back at the Supreme Court. Trump should just give her a conditional pardon, but I doubt he will.

No , but most 18 years old know that torturing a human being to death for over 30 minutes is wrong.

Human kind really is fucked if a young adult doesn’t know that by 18. An adult.

It’s shameful the victims family have to go through this seeing this murderer become a victim.

Clearly many people , not necessarily on here, have not even read up on her crimes whilst saying how sorry they feel for her.

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 18:18

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 18:15

The rules of engagement forbid shooting at someone who is helpless and unable to defend themselves, so I imagine it probably would cause them major qualms.

To be fair, that doesn't apply to Americans.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 18:20

Paul2023 · 07/10/2026 18:18

No , but most 18 years old know that torturing a human being to death for over 30 minutes is wrong.

Human kind really is fucked if a young adult doesn’t know that by 18. An adult.

It’s shameful the victims family have to go through this seeing this murderer become a victim.

Clearly many people , not necessarily on here, have not even read up on her crimes whilst saying how sorry they feel for her.

I posted her crime on here. So everyone could see.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 18:23

Paul2023 · 07/10/2026 18:18

No , but most 18 years old know that torturing a human being to death for over 30 minutes is wrong.

Human kind really is fucked if a young adult doesn’t know that by 18. An adult.

It’s shameful the victims family have to go through this seeing this murderer become a victim.

Clearly many people , not necessarily on here, have not even read up on her crimes whilst saying how sorry they feel for her.

I am blown away but the sympathy that is being shown here for someone who tortured and murdered someone over jealousy with added bonus of it all also being pre meditated too.

Yeah her life was horrific as a child, but seriously this person is a monster for what she did to that woman. You cannot say she didn’t know right from wrong because she even knew the abuse she endured was wrong hence telling people she thought she could trust. The report I just read done by someone who assessed her shows she knew right from wrong. Yet some posters on here have said she may not have known right from wrong…. 😑

Bitsostuff · 07/10/2026 18:31

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 18:04

Wayne Broadhurst’s murderer for example.

OK, why that one? What would be the rule: mentally ill and non- white?

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 18:31

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 13:12

Yet again, the issues is not just that she endured horrific abuse as a toddler, it is that she was abused even before birth by virtue of damage caused by her mother's alcohol consumption which would have irreparably harmed her brain; and that her abuse continued way beyond toddlerhood, right through her childhood. Why do you keep trying to minimise this? What precisely is your evidence of all these people who have suffered all of that without being damaged?

And why do you keep coming up with this utter fiction that those who disagree with you want a free pass for her? I haven't seen one single poster on this thread asking for that.

Here you are implying what I have said.

LouiseMadetheBestBroccoliPasta · 07/10/2026 18:33

Paul2023 · 07/10/2026 18:18

No , but most 18 years old know that torturing a human being to death for over 30 minutes is wrong.

Human kind really is fucked if a young adult doesn’t know that by 18. An adult.

It’s shameful the victims family have to go through this seeing this murderer become a victim.

Clearly many people , not necessarily on here, have not even read up on her crimes whilst saying how sorry they feel for her.

I know what she did. It does not excuse the grotesque barbarism of what happened to her. If we condone this, we join her in the hellscape of human depravity.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 18:34

Yetanotherone12 · 07/10/2026 13:11

Did she truly understand the death penalty though?

as pp have said, she was just 18, with brain damage from FAS and childhood trauma. She clearly didn’t understand what she had done was wrong, she didn’t attempt to hide it, and was quite open about what she’d done.

it’s well known that the brain doesn’t fully mature until mid 20-s and part of that is the ability to foresee consequences of one’s actions. How many teens speed in cars not for one minute thinking oh I might kill someone doing this.

i haven’t seen if she had full psychiatric assessments when she was young but somehow i doubt she was a “normal” functioning adult by average standards.

@Fortuityanother person saying this and has said what I said was being said.

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 18:34

LouiseMadetheBestBroccoliPasta · 07/10/2026 18:33

I know what she did. It does not excuse the grotesque barbarism of what happened to her. If we condone this, we join her in the hellscape of human depravity.

which has no place on Mumsnet.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 18:38

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 11:38

This was not one instance of abuse as a toddler. This is someone who was abused even before birth by Foetal Alcohol syndrome who then spent her entire life being horrifically abused.

The fact that you seek to bend the facts to minimise what happened speaks volumes.

@Fortuityyou see you mention this a lot

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 18:42

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 10:46

Would she? She spent her formative years seeing people committing horrific crimes against her as a helpless child and getting away with it. How did that teach her the difference between right and wrong?

@Fortuity🧐

Thecatspantaloons · 07/10/2026 18:44

Paul2023 · 07/10/2026 18:18

No , but most 18 years old know that torturing a human being to death for over 30 minutes is wrong.

Human kind really is fucked if a young adult doesn’t know that by 18. An adult.

It’s shameful the victims family have to go through this seeing this murderer become a victim.

Clearly many people , not necessarily on here, have not even read up on her crimes whilst saying how sorry they feel for her.

I wouldn't excuse what she has done but as a Brit I suspect that if she had committed the same crime here she could possibly be out by now, it's rare to get a whole life tariff here and she has spent 30 years in solitary.

She hasn't gotten away with anything.

What you and the other blood thirsty are battling with, is our and other civilised countries, reaction to the death penalty in the first place. It has no place in modern society - especially like this.

I will die on this hill, at 54 I won't change my mind on this ever.

LouiseMadetheBestBroccoliPasta · 07/10/2026 18:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ColdAsAWitches · 07/10/2026 18:48

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 18:12

And those cases from the 80s are more
likely to be innocent than people convicted yesterday. I miss no point at all.

Perhaps cases where the conviction was made without forensic/DNA evidence should be reviewed. I’m not against that, it’s kind of been my point all along. The death penalty has to be made without a doubt.

But by the standards of the time, in the example I gave you, there was no doubt. There were witnesses, evidence, even a confession! How do you know that future technology won't be invented that will prove that a number of people convicted now are not also innocent? "No doubt" is either not measurable, or needs qualification because it is not an achievable target. Otherwise you're accepting that your method will kill innocent people.

mtobrokeme · 07/10/2026 18:51

I do agree with the death penalty. I would want it for anybody that murdered my son.

However, would I feel as a mother that justice had been served? No, I don’t think justice, in cases such as this, actually exists. Lock her up for life? She still has a life. Execute her? Well, I’m still living with the pain of what she did. Will either of those options bring back the victim? Of course not. So, there is no justice.

What should happened to Christa Pike? I simply don’t care. I don’t care what happens to people like her. But I don’t believe that whatever they do, will ever be ‘justice’.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 18:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

LouiseMadetheBestBroccoliPasta · 07/10/2026 19:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I have read the entire thread, the entire discussion between you and @Fortuity , and you seem to be completely unable to understand even the basics. You have been disputed by multiple people, not just @Fortuity . Your argumentation consists entirely of mindlessly repeating your point and not listening. Again and again and again. You have failed entirely to convince me and others because you seem unable to engage in reasonable discussion. It's gotten bloody boring.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 19:05

LouiseMadetheBestBroccoliPasta · 07/10/2026 19:00

I have read the entire thread, the entire discussion between you and @Fortuity , and you seem to be completely unable to understand even the basics. You have been disputed by multiple people, not just @Fortuity . Your argumentation consists entirely of mindlessly repeating your point and not listening. Again and again and again. You have failed entirely to convince me and others because you seem unable to engage in reasonable discussion. It's gotten bloody boring.

Bloody boring yet decided to quote me on a thread. Why bother trying to belittle me if I’m boring. Just keep out of it?

I am allowed to express how I feel and what I believe about something as everyone is.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 19:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Yetanotherone12 · 07/10/2026 19:11

mtobrokeme · 07/10/2026 18:51

I do agree with the death penalty. I would want it for anybody that murdered my son.

However, would I feel as a mother that justice had been served? No, I don’t think justice, in cases such as this, actually exists. Lock her up for life? She still has a life. Execute her? Well, I’m still living with the pain of what she did. Will either of those options bring back the victim? Of course not. So, there is no justice.

What should happened to Christa Pike? I simply don’t care. I don’t care what happens to people like her. But I don’t believe that whatever they do, will ever be ‘justice’.

See I disagree. I would want them to live the rest of their life with what they’ve done. To suffer a lifetime of incarceration, locked up with other criminals, no freedom.

death is too easy. The death penalty allows them to be free from their crimes. Unless you believe in some sort of hell where they’ll be punished for eternity, I’d rather they spent time on earth being punished.