Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Christa Pikes is awake and ‘talking’

930 replies

wouldntyouwanthelp · 06/10/2026 22:32

She’s out of the coma and talking to her lawyers. Aibu to think the state of Tennessee can’t possibly try to do the lethal injection again ? Surely not? People on Reddit are suggesting she might need an amputation of one of her arms because of how caustic pentobarbital is.

Christa Pike 'conscious and speaking at hospital' after failed execution in US
https://news.sky.com/share/13595950

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Cadeaukatze · 07/10/2026 16:58

People are not excusing what she did.

They are saying that her punishment should have taken into account her background of horrific abuse and FAS.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 16:59

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 16:11

Sally Clark and Angela Canning were not sentenced to the death penalty. The other case is from the 70s and as I’ve previously said using examples prior to DNA testing as an argument against capital punishment today is not relevant.

The point is, though, that these are all examples of people who have wrongly been convicted of murder, and we know that is continuing today. Even DNA testing does not provide cast iron proof of guilt. It follows that the US, or indeed any country, followed the practice of "cracking on" with executions and forbidding all appeals, there would inevitably be more miscarriages of justice.

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 07/10/2026 16:59

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 16:54

100% I agree with rich people getting away with more for the more expensive lawyers I mean look at P.diddy.

You can’t keep excusing this woman though.

Please try to figure out the difference between "excusing" and "migitating circumstances"

And please figure out that opposing the death penalty for her does not mean she should be let off, allowed to walk free, sail off into the sunset.

Everyone on this threat (bar one, perhaps) thinks that she deserved punishment.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:01

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 16:13

But to add to my previous post, tortured too, so not a swift quick killing, she purposely inflicted pain, frightening and scare into this person too, pro longing it before finally murdering her.

That still doesn't explain why mitigating factors cannot be taken into account on sentencing. After all, they were for her co-accused, who if anything was the ringleader and did worse things than Pike did.

Q2C4 · 07/10/2026 17:01

seahorsessky · 06/10/2026 22:46

I'm against the Death Penalty anyway, for various reasons. But I don't see the logic in them changing their minds, as in, if you believe she deserved it in the first place, then why not now? Just as if someone put in prison for life is attacked, while you might blame the authorities for allowing that, you presumably wouldn't want the person not to have to serve out the rest of their sentence.
Unless what has happened to her made you change your mind and you are now against the DP, obviously.

But then why provide medical care at all? Patch her up just so the state can have another go at killing her?

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 17:01

Cadeaukatze · 07/10/2026 16:57

I didn't see the original post before it was deleted but Ian Huntley died after being attacked in jail and loads of people said "good riddance" and their posts weren't deleted although many other people made the point that it's not acceptable for prisoners to be allowed to attack other prisoners.

Again regarding him too I literally have no sympathy for what happened to him while inside and being attacked by other inmates. In fact I find it satisfying, I hope the same is done to the two men who adopted little baby Preston it wouldn’t surprise me if that ends up being the final outcome with them both. Absolute vile monsters.

climbintheback · 07/10/2026 17:02

Come on - it’s 2026 DNA CCTV etc - do you really think someone is executed because someone said they did it!

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:03

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 16:18

@Fortuityoh and it wasn’t self defense to because she was lured there by pike and her BF

Why on earth is that addressed to me? When did I claim it was self defence? More fiction.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 17:07

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:01

That still doesn't explain why mitigating factors cannot be taken into account on sentencing. After all, they were for her co-accused, who if anything was the ringleader and did worse things than Pike did.

It’s because her co accused was trialed as an adult and took a plea deal, she didn’t, she continued to say she didn’t do it when the evidence was stacked up against her, she must of thought too maybe she wouldn’t get as harsh a punishment.

Whether one person or the other did more than the other they are both as bad as each other, they both planned to lure their victim onto the woods under the false pretence of laying to bed issues with each other and instead tortured Colleen for 30 minutes even though she cried and screamed and wept in pain and begged for her life and actually went to the extent of drawing a pentagon into her flesh while she was still alive before finally murdering her. I’m sorry but I can’t comprehend how anyone can have any sympathy for such a violent and disgusting crime. Yeah she had a bad childhood ok but come on, the sheer brutality of this murder screams out to me also the playing fact that is was planned and pre meditated.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 17:09

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:03

Why on earth is that addressed to me? When did I claim it was self defence? More fiction.

No I was saying it wasn’t self defense incase you used that next.

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 17:11

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 16:45

I must admit, I'd stack the deck, if I had to win.

Meaning what in relation to our discussion?

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:12

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 16:22

I claiming I do not believe a lot since the Epstein files have come out and majority of them have been redacted. I do not trust what the government or the royal family or anyone of power say when a lot of high profile names including that of a prince was sexually assaulting and abusing trafficked vulnerable young ladies from poor backgrounds for sexual gratification by a man who was allowed to be enabled and got away with it for as long as he did. So no I have lost trust in what is true or not about a lot of things and I have questioned a lot too.

But for every country's statistics to be wrong, this would have to be a plot involving every country. Why would Norway, for instance, be motivated to falsify their homicide statistics? Indeed, why would the US, when those statistics not only demonstrate that the death penalty doesn't work but also that their gun laws are utterly fucked up?

Raving about a sexually incontinent prince really doesn't help your argument.

LouiseMadetheBestBroccoliPasta · 07/10/2026 17:14

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 07/10/2026 16:59

Please try to figure out the difference between "excusing" and "migitating circumstances"

And please figure out that opposing the death penalty for her does not mean she should be let off, allowed to walk free, sail off into the sunset.

Everyone on this threat (bar one, perhaps) thinks that she deserved punishment.

"Please try to figure out the difference between "excusing" and "migitating circumstances"
And please figure out that opposing the death penalty for her does not mean she should be let off, allowed to walk free, sail off into the sunset."

This poster either has the short-term memory of a goldfish or is just invincibly ignorant.

I've just read pages of @Fortuity - who should be canonised for their saintly patience - trying again and again to make these points to this poster, to zero avail. Nothing penetrates.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:14

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 16:23

Like I said before now she kind of knows how it feels but in this case it wasn’t premeditated.

I'm sorry, this just doesn't make sense. Maybe try again?

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:16

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 16:25

Yes she did she knew she would be imprisoned for her crime. You simply cannot get away with murder. You will be trialed and sentence and that she would have known at minimum.

So what on earth is your point? She knew she could be imprisoned, no-one is saying she shouldn't have been imprisoned. Equally, no-one is saying she should have got away with anything.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:18

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 16:34

Oh look!!!

Pike rejected a deal offered by the prosecution to plead guilty in return for a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.[27]

Soo she actually rejected a plea deal. 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐 which I’m guessing is why she got the death penalty. So actually everyone on this post saying her childhood impacted her choices and decisions even though evidence was stacked up against her for a crime she committed she STILL thought maybe she would get lower than life imprisonment without parole. Maybe she’s not as ‘damaged’ as people think.

Edited

The point is that she shouldn't have been put in that position. It should have been axiomatic that the death penalty was not on the table.

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 07/10/2026 17:18

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 16:58

Is there evidence of this FAS that led to her having brain damage? Medical records? Before birth from the mother and after birth?

Yes

https://nashvillebanner.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Dr.-Brand-Forensic-Psychological-Evaluation_Christa-Pike_07.29.23.pdf

Others saw her mother drinking and getting high twice a week

^Although Carissa denies that she was smoking cigarettes or marijuana,
or drinking alcohol during her pregnancy with Christa, her father, Glenn, reports that Carissa was drinking approximately once a week and getting high twice per month during her pregnancy.^

^Christa had ceased smoking marijuana and
drinking when she found out she was pregnant, which according to Glenn Pike, her own mother had not done when she was pregnant with Christa^

Christa was also prone to seizures, which happen when the electrics in the brain go haywire.

She also had untreated bipolar disorder.

She was also separated from her mother immediately after birth as she was seriously ill after birth and taken to a different hospital where her mother couldn't visit; the health issues seem to have been serious.

Newborns separated from and who spend little time with their mothers are at risk of developing attachment disorders, which lead to a multitude of behavioural and relationship problems if not treated.

On top of that trauma itself can change the way the brain functions and in children in the way it develops. I was told that literally certain areas of the brain don't develop as well or fully, if the trauma is severe enough, and those areas are often to do with controlling emotions and clear thinking.

https://nashvillebanner.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Dr.-Brand-Forensic-Psychological-Evaluation_Christa-Pike_07.29.23.pdf

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:22

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 16:36

What is “wonderland” about stating there are cases where the guilty party is undeniably guilty. Having the ability to appeal doesn’t make them any less guilty?

I also stated I believe the ability to appeal should not be allowed in specific cases, not that is shouldn’t be available to all, so why you’re suggesting I want you to “accept my wonderland” is anyone’s guess or was this response meant for another poster?

There are cases where the accused undeniably did what they are accused of, but are not guilty because relevant elements of the offence don't apply, particularly in relation to the intent involved and whether they are able to form that intent, Those issues may well form the basis of valid appeals.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 17:22

LouiseMadetheBestBroccoliPasta · 07/10/2026 17:14

"Please try to figure out the difference between "excusing" and "migitating circumstances"
And please figure out that opposing the death penalty for her does not mean she should be let off, allowed to walk free, sail off into the sunset."

This poster either has the short-term memory of a goldfish or is just invincibly ignorant.

I've just read pages of @Fortuity - who should be canonised for their saintly patience - trying again and again to make these points to this poster, to zero avail. Nothing penetrates.

I’m just expressing and discussing my views and beliefs as anyone else is and I am entitled too.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 17:25

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 17:16

So what on earth is your point? She knew she could be imprisoned, no-one is saying she shouldn't have been imprisoned. Equally, no-one is saying she should have got away with anything.

Because you stated that she wouldn’t have known the consequences for her actions due to her FAS and her brain damage and childhood.

Yetanotherone12 · 07/10/2026 17:26

climbintheback · 07/10/2026 17:02

Come on - it’s 2026 DNA CCTV etc - do you really think someone is executed because someone said they did it!

Do you really think there are never miscarriages of justice?

people can be convicted without dna or cctv evidence. Some people confess to crimes they don’t commit. Some people can have bad lawyers, witnesses can lie.

“he most recent death row inmate to be officially exonerated in the United States is Jermaine “Marlow” Wrightof Delaware, who was granted a Certificate of Innocence and expungement of his conviction on July 23, 2026. 1]”

he made a confession while under the influence of heroin, and a false testimony from a cellmate.

so yes, it’s 2026 and innocent people can be on death row.

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 17:26

ColdAsAWitches · 07/10/2026 16:53

What are the cases where there is no doubt though? The guy that was released from death row last week had confessed because he was coerced by the police. They had also interfered with the evidence. By your standard there would have been no doubt, but you would be wrong.

Well no, absolutely not “by my standard” as I’ve said numerous times now the death penalty should only be applied to cases without a doubt.

So you dredging up a case from the 80s that didn’t rely on DNA, only a confession and eyewitness testimony is exactly the opposite of “my standards.”

I’ve said in a previous comment, before modern technology, convictions were made on unreliable evidence. Applying the poor standards of historical cases to todays technology and reliable forensic evidence is irrelevant.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 17:28

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 07/10/2026 17:18

Yes

https://nashvillebanner.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Dr.-Brand-Forensic-Psychological-Evaluation_Christa-Pike_07.29.23.pdf

Others saw her mother drinking and getting high twice a week

^Although Carissa denies that she was smoking cigarettes or marijuana,
or drinking alcohol during her pregnancy with Christa, her father, Glenn, reports that Carissa was drinking approximately once a week and getting high twice per month during her pregnancy.^

^Christa had ceased smoking marijuana and
drinking when she found out she was pregnant, which according to Glenn Pike, her own mother had not done when she was pregnant with Christa^

Christa was also prone to seizures, which happen when the electrics in the brain go haywire.

She also had untreated bipolar disorder.

She was also separated from her mother immediately after birth as she was seriously ill after birth and taken to a different hospital where her mother couldn't visit; the health issues seem to have been serious.

Newborns separated from and who spend little time with their mothers are at risk of developing attachment disorders, which lead to a multitude of behavioural and relationship problems if not treated.

On top of that trauma itself can change the way the brain functions and in children in the way it develops. I was told that literally certain areas of the brain don't develop as well or fully, if the trauma is severe enough, and those areas are often to do with controlling emotions and clear thinking.

Thank you.

Fair enough. I just wanted to see if there was actual evidence of this or if this was rumours spilled on the internet. Thank you for sharing this with me.

LouiseMadetheBestBroccoliPasta · 07/10/2026 17:28

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 17:22

I’m just expressing and discussing my views and beliefs as anyone else is and I am entitled too.

You are either wilfully not getting it or you are just not capable.

"Please try to figure out the difference between "excusing" and "migitating circumstances"
And please figure out that opposing the death penalty for her does not mean she should be let off, allowed to walk free, sail off into the sunset."

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 17:28

Yetanotherone12 · 07/10/2026 17:26

Do you really think there are never miscarriages of justice?

people can be convicted without dna or cctv evidence. Some people confess to crimes they don’t commit. Some people can have bad lawyers, witnesses can lie.

“he most recent death row inmate to be officially exonerated in the United States is Jermaine “Marlow” Wrightof Delaware, who was granted a Certificate of Innocence and expungement of his conviction on July 23, 2026. 1]”

he made a confession while under the influence of heroin, and a false testimony from a cellmate.

so yes, it’s 2026 and innocent people can be on death row.

I think the point a few posters are making here (naming no names) is that just being innocent alone isn't a reason not to face execution.