Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Christa Pikes is awake and ‘talking’

930 replies

wouldntyouwanthelp · 06/10/2026 22:32

She’s out of the coma and talking to her lawyers. Aibu to think the state of Tennessee can’t possibly try to do the lethal injection again ? Surely not? People on Reddit are suggesting she might need an amputation of one of her arms because of how caustic pentobarbital is.

Christa Pike 'conscious and speaking at hospital' after failed execution in US
https://news.sky.com/share/13595950

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 15:07

Yetanotherone12 · 07/10/2026 15:03

So the collateral damage of innocent people is worth the monetary savings for you?

those 200 people exonerated from death row, would probably be dead before they got a chance to clear themselves.

but that’s ok if you save some cash?

If you had read my previous comments you’d understand my stance on this.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 15:08

@Fortuityto the ‘yet you have admitted that she didn’t know she would be tortured’ off course she didn’t because death penalty means lethal injection which means death but she survived it. As I said how could she have seen that happening she isn’t mystic Meg.

Yetanotherone12 · 07/10/2026 15:10

EvieBB · 07/10/2026 15:04

How does the death penalty cost more than life in prison?

Seen how much lawyers cost?

30 years of legal appeals, plus death row is a very expensive facility.

at the end of which if the death sentence is successfully argued against they get life anyway.

so compare the cost of life in prison, vs 30 years of higher cost prison, plus legal fees, court fees, the cost of the execution itself.

Frequency · 07/10/2026 15:10

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 15:02

Oh yes!! I forgot that one.

Everyone in the world who has had a decent childhood hasn’t become a murderer. So you’re saying now that all murderers, child abusers, Peadophiles and rapists all had bad childhoods? That this is the only reason for them becoming who they are.

The current science around pedophilia points towards it being a biological factor, linked to sexuality.

Being attracted to children, as abhorrent as it is to those of us who are not afflicted, is not a crime and should not be treated as one. Acting on it is very much a crime, and it should be punished accordingly.

As for the rest of your points, most not all of those people did have bad childhoods, and like Pike, this should be taken into account, along with their age and the circumstances of the crime, when determining their punishment and whether they can or should be rehabilitated and released.

No one is saying that anyone should "get away" with committing heinous crimes because of childhood trauma and abuse.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:11

OtterlyAstounding · 07/10/2026 13:43

Fucking hell, a poster tells you she was sexually and physically abused from toddlerhood to 14, and that's your response?

Try making the effort of reading the post properly and in context.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:13

OtterlyAstounding · 07/10/2026 13:46

That's not at all what I said. Unless you think all people with FAS really are all committing murders and abuses because of the condition?

Obviously not, but that is the logical conclusion of what you posted.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 15:14

Frequency · 07/10/2026 15:10

The current science around pedophilia points towards it being a biological factor, linked to sexuality.

Being attracted to children, as abhorrent as it is to those of us who are not afflicted, is not a crime and should not be treated as one. Acting on it is very much a crime, and it should be punished accordingly.

As for the rest of your points, most not all of those people did have bad childhoods, and like Pike, this should be taken into account, along with their age and the circumstances of the crime, when determining their punishment and whether they can or should be rehabilitated and released.

No one is saying that anyone should "get away" with committing heinous crimes because of childhood trauma and abuse.

A biological factor? This is the first time I have heard of this, even though I did think this. Is it linked to mental health?

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:16

We're not all clones of each other, and I am prepared to guarantee that you cannot produce any example of someone who has had a comparable childhood - because no-one's experience is the same. Couple that childhood with the fact that the person concerned was already damaged by foetal alcohol poisoning, and the comparison is even less valid.

MrsShawnHatosy · 07/10/2026 15:17

EvieBB · 07/10/2026 14:57

A bad childhood does not excuse a brutal nonsensical murder

For the gazillionth time, no one is saying it does. She should and has been punished and should remain locked up.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:18

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:16

We're not all clones of each other, and I am prepared to guarantee that you cannot produce any example of someone who has had a comparable childhood - because no-one's experience is the same. Couple that childhood with the fact that the person concerned was already damaged by foetal alcohol poisoning, and the comparison is even less valid.

That was in response to a post saying

Im not deflecting i am trying to argue that not everyone who has had bad childhood becomes a murderer.

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 15:18

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 15:06

Bringing up cases from the 70s when forensics were shit and applying that to modern day isn’t relevant. I’ve previously explained that I believe the death penalty should be used in very specific cases.

How many innocent people being put to death is acceptable these days ?

I don't want to put words in your mouth, but I take it you are satisfied that every prisoner in a UK jail right now (we can take the snark over early releases as read) is guilty ?

So why are we wasting money with appeal and supreme courts. Surely we could abolish them, and build some luxury flats in their place.

iloveanearlynight · 07/10/2026 15:20

Ffs, it's absolutely ridiculous. She needed a massive, massive dose, not to be brought round again.

EvieBB · 07/10/2026 15:20

Yes I agree with mitigating factors of course

ColdAsAWitches · 07/10/2026 15:21

Waxstamp · 07/10/2026 15:06

Bringing up cases from the 70s when forensics were shit and applying that to modern day isn’t relevant. I’ve previously explained that I believe the death penalty should be used in very specific cases.

In 50 years time, the lawyers and scientists will probably regard current forensics as shit too. Improvements can always be made. You can't just declare that modern forensics are good enough and there will never be mistakes.

dustabsorber · 07/10/2026 15:22

"Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord. "So basically, if you believe in God, then best to leave it up to him/her.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:22

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 13:50

Yes exactly my point excusing that she should still be on death row!!! This is my point!!! It’s excusing she shouldn’t still be punished for her crimes and what she was sentenced too!!! Bringing into the thread her traumatic life and before being born, saying she has suffered enough that’s what I mean about people excusing her!!!!!!!!!!!!! Do you get what I mean now.

But again, I think I've only seen one person on this thread suggesting that she should be freed. The rest, me included, are saying she should probably go back to prison because she probably isn't safe to be released. Nothing justifies execution.

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 15:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 07/10/2026 15:23

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 13:28

I wonder if they could sell some of CPs organs, to try and recoup the expense of this execution ? Make money and finish the job off at the same time.

She's not in China, you know.

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 15:24

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:16

We're not all clones of each other, and I am prepared to guarantee that you cannot produce any example of someone who has had a comparable childhood - because no-one's experience is the same. Couple that childhood with the fact that the person concerned was already damaged by foetal alcohol poisoning, and the comparison is even less valid.

I agree with everyone not being the same, I also know we are not clones and we all deal with things differently.

Off course it is awful what she went through and I can’t imagine how horrific it was being her as a child and throughout until the moment she committed the crime.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:25

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 13:52

If what you’re saying is true then they shouldn’t be given life in prison if there ‘isn’t a certainty that someone is guilty’ so what is the point in the justice system full stop? 🧐

It's anything but a perfect system, but at least if someone is found to have been wrongly convicted and imprisoned they can be released, supported in their return to society, and compensated. None of that is possible if they are dead.

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 15:29

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 07/10/2026 15:23

She's not in China, you know.

True. One suspects they would not have bungled the execution.

dustabsorber · 07/10/2026 15:30

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 07/10/2026 15:23

She's not in China, you know.

Just want if you have been on dialysis a kidney laced with pentobarbital. For that reason, executed convict's organs are not harvested in the US.

dustabsorber · 07/10/2026 15:30

Just want you need, if you have been on dialysis for several years, a new kidney laced with pentobarbital. For that reason, executed convict's organs are not harvested in the US.

Fortuity · 07/10/2026 15:31

MarkAntony · 07/10/2026 14:03

Part of the issue is that the US Constitution makes any cruel and unusual punishment unlawful. The Supreme Court has considered various methods of execution and deemed them not to be cruel and unusual punishments, and one of these is pentobarbital. Any attempt to cause death by another method (one which hadn't been previously considered and OKed by the Supreme Court) would be open to a fresh challenge, making the execution potentially unlawful.

This means in practice that States generally don't use the most reliable and up to date methods, unfortunately- any attempt with a new method would be challenged on the basis above, meaning more delays- so the easiest course is to use methods that have already been approved, even if they're actually unreliable and unsuitable. The whole thing is horrific sort of farce and utterly barbaric.

I wonder if Pike's lawyers could argue that this case demonstrates that the use of pentobarbital is also a cruel and unusual punishment, at least unless the state can guarantee (a) that the drugs have been sourced recently from a reputable drugs supplier and (b) that the proposed recipient is in normal health with no issues with their blood clotting, vein availability etc?

SerendipityJane · 07/10/2026 15:33

dustabsorber · 07/10/2026 15:30

Just want you need, if you have been on dialysis for several years, a new kidney laced with pentobarbital. For that reason, executed convict's organs are not harvested in the US.

Seems a tad of an oversight, really. I am sure there are a myriad of ways of dispatching someone to keep their flesh in tip top condition.

Sounds like we need to offer a prize, to leverage all that is a good and holy in capitalism.

Swipe left for the next trending thread