Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think staying at home with children is undervalued?

1000 replies

Amby99 · 04/10/2026 21:06

I’m not ignorant of the fact that staying at home isn’t financially possible or desirable for everyone, and I don’t think children who go to nursery are disadvantaged whatsoever . There are brilliant nurseries, brilliant working mums, and plenty of happy, healthy children being raised that way (and fulfilled and happy mothers)
However, I do wonder whether society (or the government) has become so focused on measuring “productivity” through paid employment that we’ve started to undervalue the work involved in raising a child.
Badenoch saying that the government doesn’t want to “punish working parents” in relation to childcare costs … it made me wonder why being a SAHM is so rarely viewed as valuable or productive in its own right.
Preparing my baby’s first solids, BF him, reading, playing, taking him outside, talking to him, letting him explore and generally being available. It feels like important work, yet because it isn’t paid it often seems invisible.
There are of course many advantages to nursery, and that work can be important for a mother’s identity, finances, career and mental health.
But why does the conversation seem to focus so heavily on encouraging parents back into paid employment, while choosing to provide that childcare yourself is rarely encouraged or valued in the same way? I’m not talking about mothers that sit at home all day feeding their child McDonald’s and claiming every benefit under the sun. I get why they may be encouraged back into the workforce and their children would be better off at nursery. BUT I’m sick of having to feel guilty of my choice to stay home. Every parent I know who was a parent in the 90’s stayed at home and it wasn’t so frowned upon.

I just think it should be seen as a worthwhile and valuable choice rather than something that needs to be justified because you’re “not working”.

OP posts:
MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/10/2026 13:13

Ljbg · 06/10/2026 13:10

This isn't helpful! You realise how this sounds...?

Of course she does. The intended subtext is abundantly clear, but it is deliberately written in such a way that people can say "oh, she is just saying how she feels".

We all see through it and it's ridiculous.

Parker231 · 06/10/2026 13:13

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:08

You're actually being so misogynistic here.

You're basically saying she made a choice (probably a joint one with the baby's dad), and you think it's wrong because she chose to stay at home with her children and he agreed. Not one over the other. A partnership. But you're saying she did it because her partner didn't want to.

Maybe he did but put her choices first?

So she was the strong one.

You are suggesting she is an idiot doing her man's dirty work.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

Not at all! Why when there is a SAHP, is it assumed it will be the mother. Fathers are equally important and a joint parent. A father’s job outside the home in paid employment isn’t more important than the mother continuing with her career.

itsadlibitum · 06/10/2026 13:14

No one ever says dads aren’t raising their own kids when they work. Interestingly….

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:20

Parker231 · 06/10/2026 13:13

Not at all! Why when there is a SAHP, is it assumed it will be the mother. Fathers are equally important and a joint parent. A father’s job outside the home in paid employment isn’t more important than the mother continuing with her career.

You’ve just proven me right.

OtterlyAstounding · 06/10/2026 13:21

itsadlibitum · 06/10/2026 13:14

No one ever says dads aren’t raising their own kids when they work. Interestingly….

No, because our society is sexist so it's not expected as it should be, babies generally do better with their mother in the first year, and men generally earn more (again, due to sexism) making it the less sensible choice.

Personally, while I don't think WOH parents don't raise their children anyway, I would judge a father for his parenting (or lack thereof) equally.

Edited for clarity.

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:25

itsadlibitum · 06/10/2026 13:14

No one ever says dads aren’t raising their own kids when they work. Interestingly….

My husband worked full time and I chose to job share. Thankfully no one ever said to him that agreeing with my choice made him any less of a father.

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:32

Oh and btw. I was going to send my child to a childminder for the 2.5 days I worked. My FATHER, who had just retired from the police said would it be ok if he looked after him instead. My mum was still working. A man. A dad. I said yes and then my MIL asked if her and my FIL could do the half day if it was ok with my DAD.

I said yes to that too.

People on here have really skewed views about men.

Childishprodigy · 06/10/2026 13:34

Thepeopleversuswork · 06/10/2026 13:08

Respectfully you are hugely overthinking this interaction.

People ask when you are going back to work because its a standard question to ask of someone you don’t know like asking where you are going on holiday. Its boilerplate. Most people do work so it’s a perfectly rational question and its not in itself personal or sensitive.

You can’t expect people to read your particular perspective on this if they don’t know you.

I know. Quite frankly the posters massive overreaction to one person's innocent attempt at conversation says more about their own sensitivity than how society views working parents. At most baby groups there would be discussion about when people were returning to work. Some people said they weren't and that was it, the conversation moved on to other things and people thought no more about what someone's individual plan was.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/10/2026 13:37

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:25

My husband worked full time and I chose to job share. Thankfully no one ever said to him that agreeing with my choice made him any less of a father.

Well, that's the point, isn't it? Men are never told that they are less of a father because they work to provide for their children, and yet a woman who does the same will constantly find herself stereotyped as less of a mother.

Childishprodigy · 06/10/2026 13:37

Ljbg · 06/10/2026 12:59

The potty training/toothbrushing issue is a well reported issue...as is children who've not opened a book before the age of 5.
But this is off topic, neither down to sahp or working parents. Imo this seems to be a problem with educating people on how to raise their children, and heavy reliance on technology being a babysitter.

I agree it's well known and as you say down to lazy parenting (additional needs aside of course) and absolutely nothing to do with the debate and the point I was making absolutely nothing to do with governments "brainwashing" us either.

SerenaCat93 · 06/10/2026 13:40

OtterlyAstounding · 06/10/2026 12:38

No, you seem pretty angry to me. Although I'm not sure what I've done to you.

I think it has a classist vibe to erase people who don't have intellectually stimulating jobs that they love (probably the majority of people), and assume everyone has an engaging and rewarding career. I've also noticed the same with posters on here who have said people shouldn't stay home because they'll lose out on career advancement by taking some years out of work, which of course doesn't apply to people who have jobs with little opportunity to advance.

Many people would likely find having more free time (in between parenting) to pursue the things they find engaging and stimulating, or even to study part time to retrain in something they love, much more intellectually stimulating than their job is.

Also - you think being a stay at home mum means spending all day at home alone with your child, with no opportunity to interact with other humans, or pursue intellectually stimulating and engaging interests or hobbies? Hm.

Also - you think being a stay at home mum means spending all day at home alone with your child, with no opportunity to interact with other humans, or pursue intellectually stimulating and engaging interests or hobbies? Hm.

Obviously we go out 🙄 but when I take her to an activity, it's just me and her. When we go swimming it's just me and her. When I take her to dance classes I don't find general chit chat with other mums on the way in and out fulfilling. Meal times we're at home alone unless you're cooking for other people and their kids too, nap time in alone. When I'm cooking dinner for us all to eat when my husband gets home I'm alone with her. It's pretty odd to have lots of adult conversation when you're at home with a young child. When we visit relatives so I have an adult to talk to about world events or something while we all play with her it's great. When it's just the two of us I get bored by 4pm and can't wait for my husband to get home. My experience of other mums at the activities I take my daughter to is that they just want to talk about children which isn't what I want to spend my only adult communication on.

And as for angry, many posters are angry about your classism accusations. You've been called out by several posters on that. It's not remotely classist to find activities for three year olds not mentally stimulating enough and to need adult work for their brains.

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:41

Childishprodigy · 06/10/2026 13:34

I know. Quite frankly the posters massive overreaction to one person's innocent attempt at conversation says more about their own sensitivity than how society views working parents. At most baby groups there would be discussion about when people were returning to work. Some people said they weren't and that was it, the conversation moved on to other things and people thought no more about what someone's individual plan was.

That’s some job you’ve got there. You’ve been on here all day.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/10/2026 13:42

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:41

That’s some job you’ve got there. You’ve been on here all day.

Ever heard of flexible working?

SerenaCat93 · 06/10/2026 13:43

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:08

You're actually being so misogynistic here.

You're basically saying she made a choice (probably a joint one with the baby's dad), and you think it's wrong because she chose to stay at home with her children and he agreed. Not one over the other. A partnership. But you're saying she did it because her partner didn't want to.

Maybe he did but put her choices first?

So she was the strong one.

You are suggesting she is an idiot doing her man's dirty work.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

Come again? How the hell did you get misogyny from wondering why dad's aren't irreplaceable when posters are claiming that SAHMs are irreplaceable!?

There are few posters here who should be ashamed of themselves and the ones questioning equality aren't it.

itsadlibitum · 06/10/2026 13:44

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:41

That’s some job you’ve got there. You’ve been on here all day.

Are you not wondering why all the sahps on here are on their phones rather than staring lovingly at their wonderful babies/ BFing/ taking them outside or whatever it was that they do that working parents don’t? Or is it just working parents you want to make sure are paying attention to their work.

AgeingMillennial · 06/10/2026 13:45

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/10/2026 13:37

Well, that's the point, isn't it? Men are never told that they are less of a father because they work to provide for their children, and yet a woman who does the same will constantly find herself stereotyped as less of a mother.

Men are applauded for their ‘hard work’.

I think this boils down to a lot of women feeling a bit irked that their ‘sacrifice’ hasn’t actually resulted in tangibly better kids. It’s like breastfeeding - a negligible difference, but they come on here constantly to seek affirmation and hate anyone pointing out statistically the health benefits aren’t that different (yes I did breastfeed, for years. I just accept the science and the fact it doesn’t make me an inherently better mother)

SerenaCat93 · 06/10/2026 13:45

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:41

That’s some job you’ve got there. You’ve been on here all day.

Who's trying to stop people posting now? Wind it in with the shame.

SerenaCat93 · 06/10/2026 13:46

itsadlibitum · 06/10/2026 13:44

Are you not wondering why all the sahps on here are on their phones rather than staring lovingly at their wonderful babies/ BFing/ taking them outside or whatever it was that they do that working parents don’t? Or is it just working parents you want to make sure are paying attention to their work.

Exactly! For people who are living their best lives SAHMs certainly have plenty of time for arguing on MN. Their kids clearly don't have the full attention they claim only a SAHM can give.

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:47

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/10/2026 13:37

Well, that's the point, isn't it? Men are never told that they are less of a father because they work to provide for their children, and yet a woman who does the same will constantly find herself stereotyped as less of a mother.

Ok. However, if I had earned more, he would have gone job share.

Actually our best friends did that. She had the great job, he also had a job he loved which paid less than hers.

He reduced his hours to look after their two, she went back full time.

43 years later we are all happy and we have never said she was less of a mother nor has her daughters.

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:48

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/10/2026 13:42

Ever heard of flexible working?

Yes but not that flexible.

SerenaCat93 · 06/10/2026 13:48

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:47

Ok. However, if I had earned more, he would have gone job share.

Actually our best friends did that. She had the great job, he also had a job he loved which paid less than hers.

He reduced his hours to look after their two, she went back full time.

43 years later we are all happy and we have never said she was less of a mother nor has her daughters.

You might not have, but many on this thread have.

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:51

SerenaCat93 · 06/10/2026 13:48

You might not have, but many on this thread have.

They may have but I haven’t. So post to the ones who have!

Ljbg · 06/10/2026 13:53

HappyLittleTreeFriend · 05/10/2026 08:27

It is aspirational if you enjoy teaching and raising your child?? It depends on what you aspire to personally? I was a a SAHP until both my children were in school, I think they benefited from it and so did me and my partner, we weren’t too busy/stressed with childcare etc, we enjoyed all the family time and we did sacrifice money wise but we aren’t very materialistic people so it was worth it, now they are both in school I’ve changed career and have career based aspirations and we are building savings up etc - life isn’t as rigid as ‘if you are a SAHP you have no aspirations’ - that’s nonsense, sorry. I was previously a teacher - the skills and enjoyment from teaching, a professional career, have massive overlap with parenting and raising your own child.

I'm so glad you responded so well. This post really irritated me, but I was so wound up I couldn't think how to respond well. Yours is spot on. My partner and I have done the same. I was head chef previously, now my son is 9 months I am returning to work part time ( not as a head chef ) when he goes to school I will endeavour to find work as a head chef again. Does it affect my career trajectory re' salary, yes a lot. Do I want to be my child's main caregiver, yes a lot!

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/10/2026 13:53

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:47

Ok. However, if I had earned more, he would have gone job share.

Actually our best friends did that. She had the great job, he also had a job he loved which paid less than hers.

He reduced his hours to look after their two, she went back full time.

43 years later we are all happy and we have never said she was less of a mother nor has her daughters.

Well, that's all very nice, but it doesn't change the fact that society typically judges mothers for working while lauding fathers for doing the same.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/10/2026 13:56

Differentforgirls · 06/10/2026 13:48

Yes but not that flexible.

I have complete flexibility in how and when I do my work. We aren't all bound by a rigid 9-5.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.