Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel frustrated about manager's repeated maternity leave?

237 replies

ShesPregnantAgain · 03/10/2026 11:44

My manager, let's call her Betty, has just announced her fifth pregnancy. I've enthusiastically congratulated her but I'm actually pissed off. She's barely been at work for the past 7 years. She gets pregnant, that makes her ill so she's off for most of her pregnancy, then 9 months on maternity leave, comes back and a few months later does it all again.

The job she used to do doesn't really exist any more. The company's moved on: all the people, systems and expectations are different. They get in maternity cover for her every time so someone gets trained up, actually does a good job, does a handover when she comes back and then leaves. It's so disruptive.

I know the company can't fire her for pregnancy-related sickness or for taking maternity leave per her statutory rights. They can't even performance manage her because she's never here long enough, or appoint one of her covers to do the job permanently. None of us can work for promotion to her level because that would discriminate against her. Her manager does promote people out sideways and upwards but she's just there, filling the role without actually doing anything. We all just get on without her.

I know that women, me included, benefit from these protections because of the crap women suffered in the past. I just think she's taking the piss.

OP posts:
BeDandyDenimSloth · 03/10/2026 16:35

What is altruistic about causing so much disruption in your workplace and for your work colleagues, as we need to increase birth rate this should be supported by the government not businesses

OompaLoofah · 03/10/2026 16:35

We had someone like your manager. Back to back maternity and back to back pregnancy related sickness, so she was never in the office once she announced at 12 weeks she was pregnant again (usually a week or two after returning to work) and as as soon as she did that, she was off sick again.

For starters - if she’s too ill to work during her pregnancy, then your employer can start her mat leave early (unless rules have since changed), it’s for her and the baby’s wellbeing.

Then for the two remaining managers, their roles need to change and incorporate aspects that your manager doesn’t do to make the roles different enough that your manager’s role can be made redundant.

Employers will also need to enforce the requirements that she’s working in the office and doing the travel she’s supposed to. They have to make it clear it’s not acceptable to use wfh as a form of childcare.

Also when she’s on mat leave, they should be making use of KIT days and informing her what’s different eg new systems, processes etc, in order to try and reduce disruptions when she’s back.

Good luck, it’s always a few that take the piss and give pregnant women and. Others a bad name. Unfortunately this is why some employers are cautious about hiring women of child bearing age.

zoeslim · 03/10/2026 16:36

I am a woman we have out own business
This is one reason I do not employ women of child bearing age

blubberyboo · 03/10/2026 16:40

ShesPregnantAgain · 03/10/2026 13:48

I'm definitely not jealous. I wanted 4 kids, then actually had children and realised that alongside all the nice bits, being a parent was tedious, relentless and exhausting. I was very happy to stop at 2 and am even happier now they're old enough for me to have a decent night's sleep and a bit of time for myself. If she wants umpteen children then all power to her but it's not the life for me.

I am annoyed that she's disrupting an otherwise perfectly nice, interesting job. Imagine she actually comes back to work in 2028 expecting to WFH while looking after a preschooler, a toddler and a baby. That's going to completely ruin the flexibility our employer gives everyone who doesn't take the piss, like allowing us the odd WFH day if our child is ill rather than making us take a day off a/l or unpaid. It's going to have to be one rule for everyone.

Edited

An employer giving her the flexibility to WFH doesn't mean she has the right to have the children at home under her care while she works.

If she is looking after 3 kids while she works the employer could and should pull her up about it. She should be 100% focussed on work for the full day

2025M · 03/10/2026 16:40

zoeslim · 03/10/2026 16:36

I am a woman we have out own business
This is one reason I do not employ women of child bearing age

So you employ no women from basically working age 16/18 to 45 as although rarer still possible... So basically you severely limit your hiring pool to basically men.

How do you think your customers arrive on this world.... By being born.

Honestly utterly ridiculous.

HappyLizard23 · 03/10/2026 16:40

PrincessofWills · 03/10/2026 15:21

It is the employer's issue for not managing their employees effectively- not a woman's fault who is taking maternity leave/sick leave in accordance with her employment rights.

She’s not getting equal rights, shes getting extra rights.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 03/10/2026 16:44

BeDandyDenimSloth · 03/10/2026 16:35

What is altruistic about causing so much disruption in your workplace and for your work colleagues, as we need to increase birth rate this should be supported by the government not businesses

Last I checked the goverment do pay maternity pay and maternity rights are enshirned in law which is also the goverment really. In Australia where they take raising the birth rate seriously- they hold a job open for 7 years....

TerrysNeapolitan · 03/10/2026 16:45

I was in the same kind of position with a colleague years ago, three pregnancies - always ill, one time even got pregnant again before she was due to come back off mat leave, special permission to WFH, no other person in the dept was allowed, then went "flexible hours" to accommodate all the young children so she would often do hours at night which was a fat lot of use when we needed to discuss work with her in the day, I worked there 5 years, I only saw her in the flesh three times and one of those was the work Xmas do! Again new systems came in and she was working the old ones. We could never speak to her direct and it was very detrimental to the team, this was proved as we had some wonderful temp covers in the office that covered her on her mat leaves and life was so much easier with them than dealing with her mainly via emails she would send a reply at night.

NewGoldFox · 03/10/2026 16:48

ShesPregnantAgain · 03/10/2026 12:20

I would be saying the same thing if it was a male boss who had worked about 6 months total in 7 years. Men don't get pregnancy-related illness or maternity leave though.

Because they can’t get pregnant.
Why don’t you focus on your career rather than taking digs at someone? It’s pathetic and it doesn’t help anyone.

phoenix098 · 03/10/2026 16:49

so you're frustrated bc another woman is... choosing to have lots of kids? I get that its disruptive or whatever but she's hardly doing it on purpose to skip work so your anger is a little misplaced

AlexandraCarrington · 03/10/2026 16:50

as we need to increase birth rate this should be supported by the government not businesses

'Supported by the government' means 'supported by taxpayers'.

GalaDinner · 03/10/2026 16:51

RomeoRivers · 03/10/2026 12:37

You are being completely unreasonable.

People are allowed to have multiple children. I’m sure she would rather not have pregnancy related illness, but it’s not something you choose. She has a right to work and will need to pay her bills just like everyone else. There’s nothing immoral about getting pregnant while working. It’s also perfectly possible that not all of the children were planned.

It’s because of people like you and PPs that we have those laws to protect women.

I agree with the OP.

Two pregnancies - fine.

Five pregnancies, particularly in such quick succession - royally taking the piss

BCBird · 03/10/2026 16:55

OtterMummy2024 · 03/10/2026 12:13

No one would say this about a man having five kids in seven years, and it takes two to tango...

The point is the man would not be off with pregnancy related sickness nor paternity leave.

Fast800goingforit · 03/10/2026 16:57

MrsRobinsonsHandprints · 03/10/2026 12:03

You can make people redundant whilst on maternity leave. You just can't make them redundant due to the maternity leave

It's the role that gets made redundant, not the person.

Sunshineandoranges · 03/10/2026 16:58

Savvysix1984 · 03/10/2026 12:06

I understand it’s frustrating, but she’s not doing anything wrong. Do you think she’s getting pregnant just to stay away from work?

Yes i do

BeDandyDenimSloth · 03/10/2026 17:02

@AlexandraCarrington I know that but we are reliant on future workforce to pay those taxes and support pensions going forward , I do think somebody taking maternity leave for repeated pregnancies back to back is taking the piss and shouldn’t be funded by the employer or government. Tackling the falling birth rate shouldn’t be by abusing already generous maternity leave benefits.

PinkFrogss · 03/10/2026 17:04

What is your occupational sick pay and maternity pay like?

Absolutely mad that someone would be signing her off for that long, multiple times.

Your organisation sounds useless at managing her.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 03/10/2026 17:05

BeDandyDenimSloth · 03/10/2026 17:02

@AlexandraCarrington I know that but we are reliant on future workforce to pay those taxes and support pensions going forward , I do think somebody taking maternity leave for repeated pregnancies back to back is taking the piss and shouldn’t be funded by the employer or government. Tackling the falling birth rate shouldn’t be by abusing already generous maternity leave benefits.

Ok what is your plan ? If not generous maternity benefits and parental or family leave ?

MrsShawnHatosy · 03/10/2026 17:06

Monty36 · 03/10/2026 12:07

I worked with someone who did this too. And yes, five times. It might have been more but I left. She was barely ever there. And everyone knew that once she was back at work it really was not long before she would be off again.

Maybe there should be a cap on maternity leaves - say you get it for the first two, but anymore and it’s unpaid leave and you fund it yourself?

spreadandsprinkles · 03/10/2026 17:08

There was a woman who had 3 pregnancies in a row but came in to sit promotion interviews on each mat leave. Got the promo despite doing fuck all for 3 years

IzzyGone · 03/10/2026 17:11

MrsShawnHatosy · 03/10/2026 17:06

Maybe there should be a cap on maternity leaves - say you get it for the first two, but anymore and it’s unpaid leave and you fund it yourself?

That would be an entire ethical issue

Xanhi · 03/10/2026 17:13

zoeslim · 03/10/2026 16:36

I am a woman we have out own business
This is one reason I do not employ women of child bearing age

I know of 4 men who have taken 6 months paternity leave. I don't know why I know so many because it is still pretty rare. Maybe it is because I work in teaching.

PinkFrogss · 03/10/2026 17:15

MrsShawnHatosy · 03/10/2026 17:06

Maybe there should be a cap on maternity leaves - say you get it for the first two, but anymore and it’s unpaid leave and you fund it yourself?

Abusive men would be big fans of that idea.

BeDandyDenimSloth · 03/10/2026 17:17

@Neurodiversitydoctor , I’m not disputing that maternity benefits should be available but an individual who for each pregnancy has been absent from work not only for their maternity leave but also had sick leave throughout their pregnancy should not be lauded for taking repeated episodes of maternity leave one after the other. My career was as a manager of a clinical service for the NHS and the employer needs to be able to provide that service which becomes nigh on impossible in a situation like this when you are not allowed to or able to recruit cover for maternity leave

Mumofoneandone · 03/10/2026 17:18

That is absolutely appalling!!
Surely she should have to keep up to date on current practice - attending training and so forth.
Does the company not have a WFH policy especially regarding having childcare in place whilst they work?
They could restructure and manage her out - reducing to 2 managers. All 3 managers have to apply for the remaining 2 jobs. All are interviewed and the strongest 2 are chosen. Questions about office based working and travel should help to demonstrate that she is no longer able to do the job! As long as the process is completely done by the book, it should work. Someone just has to have the balls to do it.
Whilst I completely agree that maternity protections need to be in place, 'misuse' of it needs addressing as well. This lady is clearly abusing the system and causing a lot of disruption to the department. She's not doing the job she's being paid to do whilst taking all the benefits she can!!