I’d love to hear others’ perspectives on what’s reasonable here. The scenario is an annual trip, usually 3-4 days, with two families:
Family A: Mum, Dad, two children (7 and 4)
Family B: Mum, Dad, one child (3)
This tradition started 30+ years ago because the parents of each family were good friends (but have since passed away). The two families live overseas from each other but decided to continue the tradition because there’s a lot of shared history and it would have made their parents happy.
This is the only time a year they see each other. The group stays in self-catering accommodation, rather than at each others’ houses.
Family A are late risers who enjoy a slow weekend morning. The siblings usually wake 7-8am and are sent downstairs to play until 10am when one of the parents will come down and join.
Family B are earlier risers. They tend to wake with their child at 7am and begin the day together.
This means that Family B keep an eye on all three children for the first 2-3 hours of the day. They are already up organising breakfast/play for their child so naturally do the same for the other two.
After a couple of years, Family B have now said this is unfair and a lot of extra work. They think at least one parent from Family A should come down with their children to help each morning. Family A feel a bit blindsided, that Family B are up anyway and the children all get on well so it really doesn’t require a lot of extra management.
Everything else - planning, cooking, cleaning - is shared equally. Who is being unreasonable?