You quoted me but without notifying me. Is that a habit of yours or is it only when you mindread the poster in case they answer and contradict you?
I’ve never said I believe LL is “clearly innocent” because I don’t know that. But I do know that the hospital has been shown to have been very badly managed, so it’s highly likely that deaths happened as a result. It’s even quite possible that LL, who was working all the overtime she could get to pay for her house might have accidentally been responsible for some of that poor care.
But your false equivalence doesnt work because you’re basing it on a single event and generalising out from that. Your argument is basically that people don’t stitch other people up. But they do. So instead, you pick a whole set of rare circumstances all occurring together and say “Well in that one situation they don’t stitch other people up because we don’t know of any other similar instance where it turned out that somebody had stitched them up.” Which is not comparable to my argument at all.
Because I started from the general case: very few women are murderers, and those who are, generally murder someone in their own family. Serial killers are almost entirely male - and even then most of those have had horrible upbringings. Serial killers within a medical setting are even rarer. Harold Shipman for instance was known to be a drug addict, and was making money from some at least of the old people he killed.
Putting those things together, it’s vanishingly unlikely that a young woman who has no obvious signs of being mentally ill or having suffered massive trauma in her youth and with nothing to gain from killing, would for some inexplicable reason become a serial killer of unknown children. It would have to be the only possible explanation. And when the hospital is failing as badly as we know that one was, it’s clearly not the possible explanation.
HTH