Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel middle-class luxuries have become increasingly out of reach?

462 replies

cocobow · Yesterday 16:07

I had to go to the local shopping centre the other day to pick up a click and collect for my husband, new work shirts so nothing fancy! I thought why not make an afternoon of it as I rarely go shopping and I could maybe get a coffee and cake and even treat myself to a little something as my birthday is coming up.

I loved some of the clothes in places like monsoon and seasalt but it was all way too expensive dresses were £80 to £100 or more same with skirts which seemed to start at £65 and I know that isn't even considered expensive today but for me it is! I went for a look in the sephora as I love skincare but again it was all really expensive. The queue for the till was full of school girls buying things I wouldn't be able to buy for myself!

To be fair they were probably there spending birthday money and probably aren't spending money like that all the time. I suppose it just feels like the goal posts on these admittedly luxury items have been moved since I was in my teens and early 20's when I imagined that by my 40's I'd be able to at least buy some of these things or buy nice clothes now and then. My husband and I both degree and post graduate educated and work in professional jobs but we have to prioritise bills, the kids and food over luxuries. To be fair we have no debt at all and we will save for an buy large purchases cash mostly but I admit to feeling a bit personally deprived at times! When my mum was my age she worked in a call centre part time in the evenings and would go round the shops most weekend and buy herself a new top or other item of clothes and exclusively used clarins skincare, I use the ordinary, cerave or boots and superdrug own brand mostly and my clothes come from charity shops. My parents were working class made good but their disposable income seemed to go a lot further than mine does. We don't even have a large mortgage.

DH and I recently looked at taking a short trip to London as a joint birthday present to each other but the cost was so expensive we seem to have quietly shelved the idea.

In the end I had a look in waterstones but even that was expensive, since when are paperbacks routinely £14.99! I never even had a coffee or bit of cake as the selection of cakes looked dry and unappetizing but would still have cost £10 in total.

Am I being unreasonable to think the cost of a middle class lifestyle with a few luxuries has had the goalposts moved by quite some amount?

OP posts:
Monty36 · Yesterday 17:53

I don’t think high street clothes shopping or buying a cake and coffee qualifies a person as being middle class.

Gibgertea · Yesterday 17:53

dingodan · Yesterday 17:46

@Gibgertea The UK isn’t just in this economic mess because of Brexit though.

It’s a big part, Liz Truss’s mini budget and Ukraine too.

the80sweregreat · Yesterday 17:55

I’ve had the same summer clothes on for years ! Any Photos of me over lockdown and before and I’m in the same tops and skirts. I wash them all and put them away safely for next year. I did buy a top in the sale , but it was heavily reduced. My friends are the same too. I find clothes hard to source as it is as they all seem so cheaply made and a lot more pricy than they used to be. I feel for families as children have to have new things and even kids clothes don’t seem as reasonably priced either and they have to buy uniforms and school shoes. It must be a nightmare for families.

dingodan · Yesterday 17:55

@Gibgerteaproductivity was struggling before Brexit though and it’s one of the reasons why the vote went the way it did. People were feeling poorer so voted to make it worse.

A huge part is the crash as I said & our housing situation

Gibgertea · Yesterday 17:55

Daisywhatsyouranswer · Yesterday 17:51

Yes broadband, sky etc didn’t exist, meals out were few and far between, families often had one car, houses were not being renovated repeatedly, new clothes was not a weekend hobby, take away coffeee was unheard of.

I do think social media has a lot to do with it. Not the op, but people post a lot of aspirational lifestyle stuff and others look and can’t understand why they can’t do that,

I do too. They also look at families in the US on SM without realising how much debt, insecurity and high prices they are wrestling with.

PancakeCloud · Yesterday 17:55

Yarboosucks · Yesterday 17:51

I would consider myself to be firmly in the middle class camp and I feel your pain. I ran our household income through the Institute of Fiscal Studies calculator and got this conclusion:

With a household after tax, after housing cost income of £5197 per week, you have a higher after housing cost income than around 99% of the population - equivalent to about 67.6 million individuals.

Well, I don't feel that wealthy when I walk around John Lewis! I balk at the idea of spending £100 on a shirt!

But with that per week net income after housing costs you very easily could? But as you note, you’re the top 1% so hardly the squeezed middle

Summerhillsquare · Yesterday 17:56

dingodan · Yesterday 17:33

Why do people pretend that in the past no one spend money on “luxuries”?!

My nan had her hair set weekly
There was 1 pub for 30 people over 150 years ago
Cinema attendance was massive in the past
Lipstick sales during the war
There were 1000 book shops in the 80s

The idea that people had one book at christmas & fish & chips was an annual treat is rubbish.

Exactly. We've just come to view those luxuries as inferior and our modern ones as essential. I will say increased marketing has a lot to do with that.

But although socialism wasn't about rampant consumerism, it was very much bread AND roses. We must have some nice things in life as well as hard work.

cocobow · Yesterday 17:56

Gibgertea · Yesterday 17:40

What you posted was a long list of unnecessary expensive items you don’t need. Out parents didn't waste money like that- just because.

My mum could afford to buy the occasional nice item from Laura Ashely it wasn't wasting money it was buying something nice she really liked once in a while. I can't afford to do that ever. Believe it or not people didn't live in sack cloth and ashes in the 70's, 80's and 90's.

OP posts:
AmazonAntiqueStore · Yesterday 17:56

Yarboosucks · Yesterday 17:51

I would consider myself to be firmly in the middle class camp and I feel your pain. I ran our household income through the Institute of Fiscal Studies calculator and got this conclusion:

With a household after tax, after housing cost income of £5197 per week, you have a higher after housing cost income than around 99% of the population - equivalent to about 67.6 million individuals.

Well, I don't feel that wealthy when I walk around John Lewis! I balk at the idea of spending £100 on a shirt!

You have an after housing cost income of over £5k per week? That’s definitely not middle earning and £100 for a shirt sounds like it would be small change to you.

Daisywhatsyouranswer · Yesterday 17:57

Gibgertea · Yesterday 17:53

It’s a big part, Liz Truss’s mini budget and Ukraine too.

You can’t be serious, liz truss;s budget is confirmed by all fiscal bodies as not remotely close to as damaging as what Labour has done since in power. Our tax burden is now the highest it’s been in decades . It is now the highest it’s been since 1945.

Didimum · Yesterday 17:58

How often are you expecting to afford the things that you mention, and what's your actual income/area of the country? You list wanting to spend the things in your OP as 'treats' (birthday, coffee and a cake because you rarely go shopping, birthday trip), so if I'm honest I can't see why you wouldn't be able to afford these things as one of treats if you consider yourself middle-class and both have decent jobs. The money must be going elsewhere as a choice.

'Every day' middle-class spending is more like H&M, Zara, Next – which is not £80-100 dresses. And paperback aren't routinely £14.99 – they are £8.99 – £10.99.

I do sympathise with the cost of living, 100%, but it seems as if your money may be going elsewhere by choice (or by short term pain such as young childcare) if you can't afford the things you list as a one off every now and again.

HoppityBun · Yesterday 17:58

Everybody but the very rich is getting poorer. Even people who think they’re comfortably well off.

cocobow · Yesterday 17:58

Monty36 · Yesterday 17:53

I don’t think high street clothes shopping or buying a cake and coffee qualifies a person as being middle class.

I don't think it does either but my point is that in the past someone with a middle class profession and education who was working might reasonably expect to be able to have the odd treat now and again, now it's a think twice situation!

OP posts:
dingodan · Yesterday 18:01

Believe it or not people didn't live in sack cloth and ashes in the 70's, 80's and 90's

Yep, but it’s the MNs narrative!

Laura Ashley launched in the 50s & expanded to more than 100 stores, strange how they did that with everyone window shopping!

frozendaisy · Yesterday 18:02

I think people need to readjust the concepts of middle-class. What used to be firmly working class, growing vegetables and going on dog walks got repackaged into aspiration activities.

Honestly it’s totally nuts.

Obviously everything has gone up, suppliers have increased bills energy, transport, wages.

I will never not buy new books though, I don’t want literature to either be just written by the wealthy or AI slop, even at £15 for a novel it gives 7/8 hours of joy at least not much is £2 an hour. Use it or lose it really.

And yes coming out if the EU was shooting ourselves in the foot, utter insanity, but that was project fear.

I don’t think considered consumerism is such a bad thing really.

dingodan · Yesterday 18:02

Daisywhatsyouranswer · Yesterday 17:57

You can’t be serious, liz truss;s budget is confirmed by all fiscal bodies as not remotely close to as damaging as what Labour has done since in power. Our tax burden is now the highest it’s been in decades . It is now the highest it’s been since 1945.

@Daisywhatsyouranswer can you explain why Labour is solely responsible for that?

backformoreofthesame · Yesterday 18:02

The odd treat meant once a year not weekly fifty years ago. When a nice bar of soap was a real treat at Christmas. My parents didn’t buy stuff every week. Or every month. And neither did I. We did have a trip to London. Once. In my 18 years living at home.

a lot of people do have odd treats - books and clothes are still selling well.

clearly you can’t afford everything you want at this point in time but I think you are drawing the wrong conclusions

likeitshard · Yesterday 18:04

Yes the middle class are the new working class and the working class are the new poor and the poor are still poor. The rich are still rich because it doesn’t affect them.

i get my clothes off Vinted , rarely wear make up and get my books from the library. Sephora monsoon and Waterstones are all expensive places. You can get all those things significantly cheaper else where.

dingodan · Yesterday 18:05

dustabsorber · Yesterday 17:52

It's set to get worse with El Niño affecting food prices. Energy bills going up. Tax rises in the Autumn budget to fund more benefit increases.

The triple lock alone adds billions to the annual benefits bill so of course taxes have to go up. An ageing population is incredibly expensive particularly when we have done nothing to plan for it.

AnswerIsNo · Yesterday 18:05

Daisywhatsyouranswer · Yesterday 17:57

You can’t be serious, liz truss;s budget is confirmed by all fiscal bodies as not remotely close to as damaging as what Labour has done since in power. Our tax burden is now the highest it’s been in decades . It is now the highest it’s been since 1945.

well, in that case, you'll be able to provide the links to the fiscal evidence that backs up your claim, no?

oh, look, I've done it for you, How have government revenues changed over time? | Institute for Fiscal Studies the numbers and trend don't quite support the claim you are making, because we were pretty much where we are now in 2022-23

Funny that

nomas · Yesterday 18:05

RedToothBrush · Yesterday 17:37

Why are you even considering buying clothes at full price? That's a mugs game!

I don't buy really cheap stuff and I don't buy from chinese online retailers. I rarely buy clothes online. I do not pay £80 for anything. I make a point not to. Its rarely worth that unless it's something really exceptional for a special occasion.

Monsoon has always had price tags in the £80 to £100 range. Why do I know? Cos I worked there after I graduated and had to buy clothes from there. Even with the staff discount it was expensive. This was the early 2000s. The prices absolutely have not increased in line with inflation.

The mistake is to go looking for something on the high street when you don't NEED something unless you are looking in the Sales. If you NEED something work out what you want and price it up first.

As for make up - you are buying a brand. Again consider what you are actually buying and when you buy it. It's often not the product it's the branding. You can get alternatives for much cheaper. Even stuff like expensive perfume - find a deal. Yes even for the big brands.

I personally tend to spend less on clothing than I used to years ago even on branded stuff because I shop smarter and there are often better deals to be had. This is priced into original prices - they initially sell at higher prices but don't expect to sell all stock at that price. They then discount heavier so if you are savvy you can get a better bargain. It's only if it's a best seller item that you want to snap it up immediately.

My rule is to never buy anything immediately. If I see something I like, I walk out the shop and go and look elsewhere first. If I want it I will go back. If I don't, I won't. The cooling off period gives me time to really think about the price and see if there is anything else similar somewhere else too (there is a much narrower trend of the season than in the past so often you will get all the shops sticking pretty similar stuff). I am patient if I do see something I like; I wait for the sales and get it then.

As for books. Second hand or on a deal again. Never buy a book at original launch price either. And don't buy hardback.

I think the money I had for stuff like this, actually goes further than it did in the past. The issue is more than being older I have less disposable income as an adult. And I don't think that has changed. My mum never bought herself stuff. She always made sure I had the disposable income instead....

I think it's expectations / shopping habits that have changed not what's available and not the prices.

Yep, I remember looking at the pretty girl's dresses in Monsoon as a child in the 90s and knowing they were unattainable at that price.

But as a young teen I was happily shopping Bay Trading Co and MK One with my pocket money.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 18:06

Gibgertea · Yesterday 17:43

Both Poland and Ireland are now member states of the EU which has helped them hugely , transforming both nations into major economic success stories.

Poland and ROI are doing well but Germany and France have stalled or have high debt. Poland has benefitted because it’s levelled up, low CT has aided ROI - we won’t vote for that.

Plus other issues for various countries including here.

TorroFerney · Yesterday 18:09

Gibgertea · Yesterday 16:57

So you’re not capable of saying no to your kids!Thats a you problem. My kids had sweets on a Friday and that was it. They rarely nagged for anything.

Also don’t be utterly ridiculous re libraries . We use 3 and have never , ever come across that. I read a lot-60 books a year. I worked out the library saved me over £500 on books for me alone last year . I order brand new books and haven’t felt the need to buy any for quite some time. My kids loved going when they were little.

Our parks are not taken over by youths either.

Edited

Agree, we are a £160k per annum household and husband and I use the local libraries and my daughter volunteers at our local one. We used to use a couple in a bit of a rough area where we used to live and no one was watching porn - are the computers not locked down? When i was a kid you'd get the odd old person in there who probably hadn't had a wash for a week reading the papers. You can get free coffee and tea in ours.

Same as you, I order books as soon as they come out and usually get them quite quickly.

I agree with others - this middle class lifestyle people think they can't afford isn't a lifestyle that has previously been one that the middle class tried to have - new cars all the time, latest phones and tech. It was get things mended and out for meals on special occasions, not buying cocktails every week.

dingodan · Yesterday 18:09

@backformoreofthesame people in the past did not “treat” themselves to 1 cake or beer a year. It’s utter nonsense!

Lyon’s alone had 200 tea shops & there were thousands of bakeries.