Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel middle-class luxuries have become increasingly out of reach?

462 replies

cocobow · Yesterday 16:07

I had to go to the local shopping centre the other day to pick up a click and collect for my husband, new work shirts so nothing fancy! I thought why not make an afternoon of it as I rarely go shopping and I could maybe get a coffee and cake and even treat myself to a little something as my birthday is coming up.

I loved some of the clothes in places like monsoon and seasalt but it was all way too expensive dresses were £80 to £100 or more same with skirts which seemed to start at £65 and I know that isn't even considered expensive today but for me it is! I went for a look in the sephora as I love skincare but again it was all really expensive. The queue for the till was full of school girls buying things I wouldn't be able to buy for myself!

To be fair they were probably there spending birthday money and probably aren't spending money like that all the time. I suppose it just feels like the goal posts on these admittedly luxury items have been moved since I was in my teens and early 20's when I imagined that by my 40's I'd be able to at least buy some of these things or buy nice clothes now and then. My husband and I both degree and post graduate educated and work in professional jobs but we have to prioritise bills, the kids and food over luxuries. To be fair we have no debt at all and we will save for an buy large purchases cash mostly but I admit to feeling a bit personally deprived at times! When my mum was my age she worked in a call centre part time in the evenings and would go round the shops most weekend and buy herself a new top or other item of clothes and exclusively used clarins skincare, I use the ordinary, cerave or boots and superdrug own brand mostly and my clothes come from charity shops. My parents were working class made good but their disposable income seemed to go a lot further than mine does. We don't even have a large mortgage.

DH and I recently looked at taking a short trip to London as a joint birthday present to each other but the cost was so expensive we seem to have quietly shelved the idea.

In the end I had a look in waterstones but even that was expensive, since when are paperbacks routinely £14.99! I never even had a coffee or bit of cake as the selection of cakes looked dry and unappetizing but would still have cost £10 in total.

Am I being unreasonable to think the cost of a middle class lifestyle with a few luxuries has had the goalposts moved by quite some amount?

OP posts:
Pizzapies · Yesterday 22:50

I don’t think high earners in their 40s have paid off their mortgages generally speaking! Unless they’re from wealthy backgrounds. Have you seen how much houses cost these days?! 🤣

AlonsoMosley · Yesterday 22:52

AlonsoMosley · Yesterday 22:44

Yes - agree with you here.

We had all the advantages of a middle class life - private schools, holidays in France, decent hobbies etc.

However, money was accounted for.

Home heating was managed carefully, ditto food budget, clothing budget and the famous "days out" that Mumsnet loves! Basically, we never did them. Our parents went out occasionally for dinners, preferring to have people at home. We were taken out to restaurants rarely, and I actually remember the very first time I was allowed to order for myself - I was 16, and told how much I could spend. 🙃

Thinking about it, there was no casual spending.

Plans were made in advance, and money managed accordingly.

In reply to my own post (!!), if dh and I were in comparable job with comparable start to married life and a family that my parents had, we would not be able to do what they did.

I truly believe that if you have a lot of billionaires, the money is coming from somewhere. Somebody is made poorer by them being made richer.

nomas · Yesterday 22:52

Pizzapies · Yesterday 22:50

I don’t think high earners in their 40s have paid off their mortgages generally speaking! Unless they’re from wealthy backgrounds. Have you seen how much houses cost these days?! 🤣

Agreed, and you also need to balance it with payments into a pension.

foursquares · Yesterday 22:54

Allergictoironing · Yesterday 22:43

That assumes that there are 2 adults both working full time and earning the average salary. Take off between £1500 & £2k for the mortgage. Take off £200 for energy costs. Take off £400 for food and other typical daily costs like loo roll, cleaning products. Maybe £75 for insurances. About £75 for TV licence, internet & mobile bills. Say £4-500 per month each for commuting costs. Up to £100 a month for Sky, Netflix, Amazon .or whatever streaming services are used. Holidays.

Then assuming there are children their clothing costs, shoes, clubs, stuff for school like uniforms, childcare costs.

Not an awful lot left of that £5.4k now is there? Certainly not £2k

Fair point. Ran it through a budget planner, and average earners with children in thier 40s probably won't be saving £2k per month. But should be saving some each month.

Additionally, some of your assumptions are high. Most people probably won't spend £800+ on commuting costs.

Additionally, OP has a top 10% household income, not median.

latetothefisting · Yesterday 23:02

FlyingPC · Yesterday 16:31

I think many who think they are middle class, or have ever been, are misguided about what it means to be middle class.

An £80 top is not middle class.

If you recall, Kate Middleton (as she was known then) came from a 'middle class' family. They lived in a large, detached home in a prestigious area and send her to an elite university.

Her tops weren't £80. Although she was labelled as 'middle class' most of us would view her family to be extremely wealthy.

I think most of Britain is, at best, lower class and there are some upper lower class. Most people are living in poverty or just the basic standard of other countries like Australia/USA etc.

You will find this to be true if you travel and see the very shocking differences in the standards of livings between Britain and other 'wealthy' countries.

Britain is not a wealthy country nor does it have a wealthy population. Once we understand that, then we probably won't feel so bad when we can't afford that 'middle class' top for £80 and just accept our Primark polyester equivalent at £20.

On the other hand, accept that inflation for substandard tops at £80 is what the going rate is now for cheap clothing.

It's not a class thing. It's inflation with stagnant wages where the poor are becoming poorer.

I think this is utter nonsense tbh.

The fact that KM was considered MC just shows how ridiculous the class system is, and why it has further brackets (LMC, UMC, etc). Her being considered MC is, if anything, proof of how illogical it is, it doesn't somehow upgrade the criteria for being middle class for everyone else just because 1 person was oddly classified.

Middle just means exactly that - the average. Broadly it's the same now as it was twenty or thirty or forty years ago - white collar jobs, decent house, parents' education to at least 6th form, now more common to degree level. The fact that some people are at the top end of that description and some at the bottom end is just how averages work. Fripperies like how much you could afford to spend on a top aren't really relevant.

Look at the 'AIBU to think tickets and popular places are much harder to access now' thread running right now - how can you say the vast majority of the population are working class and living in poverty when there is so much discretionary spending that, despite prices for almost everything being hiked disproportionately over the last few years, gigs and plays and restaurants and museum exhibitions are still completely selling out, new cars, phones, coffees etc are being constantly sold.

Approximately 14 million people tried to buy oasis tickets despite them averaging at about £100 a pop - that's more than a fifth of the population alone who felt they could drop that (plus transport, hotel, drinks, etc) on a night out, before you even take into account the many people who could also afford it but didn't want to see them.

What exactly is so superior about the lifestyles of people in traditionally middle class jobs (GP, teacher, middle management) in Australia or the USA compared to here? The only thing I can think of is larger homes, but that's because they are much bigger countries with more space, and don't need to take into account urban planning based around 1000 year old sites! If anything people in those roles in the USA have, for example, far fewer holidays than your average MC Brit due to less annual leave.

dingodan · Yesterday 23:07

foursquares · Yesterday 22:43

Again, I wasn't clear, and some is based on my assumptions.

I meant graduates who are in professional jobs for many years like OP, who are top 10% earners.

The point is your assumptions are wrong!

Plenty of higher earning 40 yr olds won’t be able to save 2k a month.

Dreameth · Yesterday 23:11

Lol

No idea why people are saying OP doesn’t sound middle class.

She sounds 100% middle class. Even down to the stingy anxiety about a £10 coffee trip 😂

You’re not wrong OP. But you do need to loosen up a bit. You can spend £10. You can probably spend the £80 too.

Unexpectedlysinglemum · Yesterday 23:19

You have enough money you just don’t like the number when you see prices so are depriving yourself on principle. By the sounds of your post.

nomas · Yesterday 23:25

latetothefisting · Yesterday 23:02

I think this is utter nonsense tbh.

The fact that KM was considered MC just shows how ridiculous the class system is, and why it has further brackets (LMC, UMC, etc). Her being considered MC is, if anything, proof of how illogical it is, it doesn't somehow upgrade the criteria for being middle class for everyone else just because 1 person was oddly classified.

Middle just means exactly that - the average. Broadly it's the same now as it was twenty or thirty or forty years ago - white collar jobs, decent house, parents' education to at least 6th form, now more common to degree level. The fact that some people are at the top end of that description and some at the bottom end is just how averages work. Fripperies like how much you could afford to spend on a top aren't really relevant.

Look at the 'AIBU to think tickets and popular places are much harder to access now' thread running right now - how can you say the vast majority of the population are working class and living in poverty when there is so much discretionary spending that, despite prices for almost everything being hiked disproportionately over the last few years, gigs and plays and restaurants and museum exhibitions are still completely selling out, new cars, phones, coffees etc are being constantly sold.

Approximately 14 million people tried to buy oasis tickets despite them averaging at about £100 a pop - that's more than a fifth of the population alone who felt they could drop that (plus transport, hotel, drinks, etc) on a night out, before you even take into account the many people who could also afford it but didn't want to see them.

What exactly is so superior about the lifestyles of people in traditionally middle class jobs (GP, teacher, middle management) in Australia or the USA compared to here? The only thing I can think of is larger homes, but that's because they are much bigger countries with more space, and don't need to take into account urban planning based around 1000 year old sites! If anything people in those roles in the USA have, for example, far fewer holidays than your average MC Brit due to less annual leave.

Edited

But upper class has a different meaning. The Middletons aren’t upper class. I agree middle class is a broader term now.

Dreameth · Yesterday 23:27

3luckystars · Yesterday 22:03

i know it’s probably been said loads of times but I have gone away from this thread and thought about it, maybe you are not middle class, you are actually working class now.

The people who you considered working class are now actually ‘poor’ and the people who used to be poor are actually homeless people now.
Middle class people are rich and wealthy people are very rich.

Im in Ireland so we don’t have any of that class thing here so I could be way off with that assessment of it all.

That’s actually quite interesting. And I think there’s something in that.

Where it gets really weird though is that this 100k household - 5.5k take home that people keep talking about - is basically pretty close to what you get when on UC.

So working class actually have as much as ‘middle class’ 100k earning professionals - yet also get subsidised sometimes (free days out £1 entry), and are much smarter at buying things ie. They buy their cigarettes black market, £300 perfumes for a tenner from the perfume girl on Facebook, and various other means to get new things for less. They don’t tend to do expensive hobbies.

Then you have MC who are split in two; those who buy everything second hand or with coupons and deals. A kind of competitive poverty at times. Or those that buy new and sell on. Have expensive hobbies. Bigger houses - so bigger utility bills. They actually have less disposable than WC families imo and they dont have the networks to get things cheap.

So that’s maybe why the prices are crazy. Because basically a large portion of the country has the same amount of money now. Just different priorities for spending.

And again to complicate things - income isn’t even class. When you meet someone you’re unlikely to know instantly how much money they have. What you do know is what class they are.

cocobow · Yesterday 23:28

Iftheapocalypsecomesbeepme · Yesterday 22:35

My mum was a teacher and dad an academic in the 80's & 90's. We lived in a four bed house in a nice location in London, I went to a private school and had lots of extra activities. Our family car was a Volvo estate and we'd have at least one UK based holiday a year.

I find it hard to believe a similar family would have the same lifestyle now. So yes OP I do agree with you.

Yes I have friends from a very similar background to you who are now in similar careers to their parents but don't have anywhere near the same standard of living their parents did.

OP posts:
cocobow · Yesterday 23:30

Dreameth · Yesterday 23:11

Lol

No idea why people are saying OP doesn’t sound middle class.

She sounds 100% middle class. Even down to the stingy anxiety about a £10 coffee trip 😂

You’re not wrong OP. But you do need to loosen up a bit. You can spend £10. You can probably spend the £80 too.

😂Perhaps you are right! I would be happier to pay the £10 if the coffee and cake was actually nice I suppose. Not sure I can justify an £80 dress though!

OP posts:
cocobow · Yesterday 23:32

AlonsoMosley · Yesterday 22:52

In reply to my own post (!!), if dh and I were in comparable job with comparable start to married life and a family that my parents had, we would not be able to do what they did.

I truly believe that if you have a lot of billionaires, the money is coming from somewhere. Somebody is made poorer by them being made richer.

"I truly believe that if you have a lot of billionaires, the money is coming from somewhere. Somebody is made poorer by them being made richer."

You are 100% correct, this is exactly what is happening.

OP posts:
Dreameth · Yesterday 23:32

cocobow · Yesterday 23:30

😂Perhaps you are right! I would be happier to pay the £10 if the coffee and cake was actually nice I suppose. Not sure I can justify an £80 dress though!

Oh 1000%

The general quality of stuff at the moment pisses me off no end!

Dreameth · Yesterday 23:33

cocobow · Yesterday 23:32

"I truly believe that if you have a lot of billionaires, the money is coming from somewhere. Somebody is made poorer by them being made richer."

You are 100% correct, this is exactly what is happening.

And I don’t actually agree with that.

Price is based on supply and demand. Elon musk isn’t buying enough clarins skin care or cupcakes to influence the price 😂

Greenmouldycheese · Yesterday 23:41

If you could afford a trip or any of these items then you aren't middle class. Not that class even matters.

TaupeFox · Yesterday 23:42

You seem to think “middle class” is all to do with income and buying material things. Being middle class is more of a mind set than a disposable income and shopping. Middle classes tend to value education, they most likely enjoy the arts, do a lot of cooking from scratch and spend a lot of time, reading, gardening and other inexpensive hobbies. I think you have the aspirational class/keeping up with the Joneses in your mind and getting muddle with the middle class.

Catsandcwtches · Yesterday 23:44

AlonsoMosley · Yesterday 22:44

Yes - agree with you here.

We had all the advantages of a middle class life - private schools, holidays in France, decent hobbies etc.

However, money was accounted for.

Home heating was managed carefully, ditto food budget, clothing budget and the famous "days out" that Mumsnet loves! Basically, we never did them. Our parents went out occasionally for dinners, preferring to have people at home. We were taken out to restaurants rarely, and I actually remember the very first time I was allowed to order for myself - I was 16, and told how much I could spend. 🙃

Thinking about it, there was no casual spending.

Plans were made in advance, and money managed accordingly.

@AlonsoMosley but sending you (and a sibling?) to a private school would have been a huge expense for your parents. Only about 7% of children in the Uk go to private school. So no wonder they had to budget in other areas!

cocobow · Yesterday 23:44

Dreameth · Yesterday 23:33

And I don’t actually agree with that.

Price is based on supply and demand. Elon musk isn’t buying enough clarins skin care or cupcakes to influence the price 😂

I think it's less that we are wanting the same things as the very rich more that when it comes to the proceeds of growth and productivity the billionaires are hoarding it all for themselves, the selfish blighters!

OP posts:
cocobow · Yesterday 23:45

TaupeFox · Yesterday 23:42

You seem to think “middle class” is all to do with income and buying material things. Being middle class is more of a mind set than a disposable income and shopping. Middle classes tend to value education, they most likely enjoy the arts, do a lot of cooking from scratch and spend a lot of time, reading, gardening and other inexpensive hobbies. I think you have the aspirational class/keeping up with the Joneses in your mind and getting muddle with the middle class.

I've discussed this in subsequent posts.

OP posts:
TaupeFox · Yesterday 23:45

Exactly. Has this person seen areas in the US like parts of Philadelphia. lol

LancashireButterPie · Yesterday 23:46

FlyingPC · Yesterday 16:31

I think many who think they are middle class, or have ever been, are misguided about what it means to be middle class.

An £80 top is not middle class.

If you recall, Kate Middleton (as she was known then) came from a 'middle class' family. They lived in a large, detached home in a prestigious area and send her to an elite university.

Her tops weren't £80. Although she was labelled as 'middle class' most of us would view her family to be extremely wealthy.

I think most of Britain is, at best, lower class and there are some upper lower class. Most people are living in poverty or just the basic standard of other countries like Australia/USA etc.

You will find this to be true if you travel and see the very shocking differences in the standards of livings between Britain and other 'wealthy' countries.

Britain is not a wealthy country nor does it have a wealthy population. Once we understand that, then we probably won't feel so bad when we can't afford that 'middle class' top for £80 and just accept our Primark polyester equivalent at £20.

On the other hand, accept that inflation for substandard tops at £80 is what the going rate is now for cheap clothing.

It's not a class thing. It's inflation with stagnant wages where the poor are becoming poorer.

What on earth are you on about?
Of course the UK is a rich nation , in the top 10 for GDP.

There is just a huge discrepancy of wealth distribution. It needs to be remedied.

Lesina · Yesterday 23:49

cocobow · Yesterday 16:07

I had to go to the local shopping centre the other day to pick up a click and collect for my husband, new work shirts so nothing fancy! I thought why not make an afternoon of it as I rarely go shopping and I could maybe get a coffee and cake and even treat myself to a little something as my birthday is coming up.

I loved some of the clothes in places like monsoon and seasalt but it was all way too expensive dresses were £80 to £100 or more same with skirts which seemed to start at £65 and I know that isn't even considered expensive today but for me it is! I went for a look in the sephora as I love skincare but again it was all really expensive. The queue for the till was full of school girls buying things I wouldn't be able to buy for myself!

To be fair they were probably there spending birthday money and probably aren't spending money like that all the time. I suppose it just feels like the goal posts on these admittedly luxury items have been moved since I was in my teens and early 20's when I imagined that by my 40's I'd be able to at least buy some of these things or buy nice clothes now and then. My husband and I both degree and post graduate educated and work in professional jobs but we have to prioritise bills, the kids and food over luxuries. To be fair we have no debt at all and we will save for an buy large purchases cash mostly but I admit to feeling a bit personally deprived at times! When my mum was my age she worked in a call centre part time in the evenings and would go round the shops most weekend and buy herself a new top or other item of clothes and exclusively used clarins skincare, I use the ordinary, cerave or boots and superdrug own brand mostly and my clothes come from charity shops. My parents were working class made good but their disposable income seemed to go a lot further than mine does. We don't even have a large mortgage.

DH and I recently looked at taking a short trip to London as a joint birthday present to each other but the cost was so expensive we seem to have quietly shelved the idea.

In the end I had a look in waterstones but even that was expensive, since when are paperbacks routinely £14.99! I never even had a coffee or bit of cake as the selection of cakes looked dry and unappetizing but would still have cost £10 in total.

Am I being unreasonable to think the cost of a middle class lifestyle with a few luxuries has had the goalposts moved by quite some amount?

What did your short trip to London comprise off & where are you travelling from? I go to London frequently, never find it too expensive

Allergictoironing · Yesterday 23:53

foursquares · Yesterday 22:54

Fair point. Ran it through a budget planner, and average earners with children in thier 40s probably won't be saving £2k per month. But should be saving some each month.

Additionally, some of your assumptions are high. Most people probably won't spend £800+ on commuting costs.

Additionally, OP has a top 10% household income, not median.

I took the figures from the internet - typical commuting costs. Though I said £4-500 a month, not £800.

My petrol "only" costs me about £140 a month, but I then have to allow for the running costs of the car and wear and tear. The 55p per mile HMRC amount is based on those kind of things, so going by that the true cost is over £300 a month. And that's a shortish commute (not feasible by public transport). Train tickets from just outside the M25 into London, a pretty typical commute, are around £450 per month if you get a monthly season ticket.

Allergictoironing · Yesterday 23:54

Oh and forgot to say - parking at the station if you don't live in walking distance is around £7 per day on top.

Swipe left for the next trending thread