Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think our public transport system needs a complete overhaul?

184 replies

creatorofthecoastguard · 02/09/2026 12:37

I’m currently on holiday in southern Europe, and on an intercity train.

So far I’ve encountered trams that are a flat rate of €1.70 a journey, buses that are €1.50 a journey, trains that are actually affordable (£9 for a 45 minute journey across the border!), it’s all been amazing. Every train has been clean, spacious, yes busy in places but only when it’s to be expected (going to popular destinations). The intercity train I’m on now isn’t oversold, isn’t rammed full of people, there’s enough luggage space.

It’s really eye opening to how poor our public transport actually is. Expensive, poorly maintained, and poor conditions.

AIBU to think it needs an overhaul, and soon? I know it wouldn’t be cheap, and that a lot of our issues stem from post-WW2 when we didn’t upgrade our risks compared to most of Europe, but it needs doing!

OP posts:
DdraigGoch · Yesterday 21:31

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 12:08

But only marginally whereas the costs of using a car for 4 people is virtually the same as for one person, so makes more sense if you have a car. Even with a railcard, the fares will almost certainly be a lot more than the petrol and parking costs.

Most cars aren't carrying four people. I believe that 1.5 is the average.

SwirlyGates · Yesterday 21:59

DdraigGoch · Yesterday 21:31

Most cars aren't carrying four people. I believe that 1.5 is the average.

But even for one person, it can be cheaper to drive than take the train.

Meanwhile, for two of us to visit our daughter, we can

a) fly, £90 return including transfers, a bit quicker than the train even with waiting around at airports. This is for underseat luggage only.
b) drive, about £120 return. A tedious 7 hrs or so.
c) take the train, an average of 7 hrs each way door to door, but a staggering £250 return fare for two, after the railcard discount.

Train should be the cheapest, and it should be affordable, but it's neither. If the price were comparable to the other modes of transport it would be our preferred option.

tokennamechange · Yesterday 23:29

Badbadbunny · 04/09/2026 16:10

Good point. The war on motorists to get them out of the cars works in some places, but doesn't work in others. Yet councils seem to make no reference to that when they "plan" their town centre improvements, hence why so many town centres have died following "traffic calming", pedestrianisations, one way systems, etc. Just because banning traffic from city centre A has worked well (because of good public transport and other localised factors), it doesn't mean it will work in city centre B. Council officials don't seem to take that into account.

In our closest small city, they've put in a park and ride to the East of the city. Trouble is, no one lives at that end. Everyone lives North, West and South, so they'd have to drive through the city to get to the PNR car park. Utter stupidity. As a result, the buses are usually either empty or only have a couple of people on board, i.e. the very few people who live at that end. Meanwhile, the city centre is grid locked because of an insane one way system around loads of access only, one way (wrong way to be useful) and pedestrianised streets, so all the drivers shun the city centre and go to the out of town supermarkets and retail parks instead. The council's answer is to make even more streets pedestrianised and unbelievably to actually make parts of the one way system access only and for buses only, too!

it honestly scares me that these people have actual degrees in urban planning or whatever.

My friend's city is replacing their park and ride with a giant data centre, while talking about introducing a clean air charge for commuters to meet their green targets - i.e. all the people THEY have forced into driving who were previously happily getting the bus!

The council increase the cost of parking then wonder why so many people avoid the city centre and shop in outlets. Then shops shut down due to lack of footfall. This results in a gap in their budget due to reduced business rates...so they increase parking again to cover it 🙈

tokennamechange · Yesterday 23:32

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 12:07

Hell is also standing cramped in vestibules on delayed trains for a few hours.

next to a smelly/farty/creepy guy eating egg sandwiches, and a toilet that doesn't work/is permanently logged due to someone taking drugs/hiding from the conductor in it.

At least in your car you are sitting comfortably, can control the smell, temperature, noise, whether you have any passengers, can usually take an alternate route if needed, can get on/off the road if you need the loo...

babyproblems · Today 06:14

People need to pay more tax to fund travel & the NHS. They won’t! Xo

Thesearenotthedroids · Today 06:23

It would be great if privatisation worked as it should. So as a consumer I can decide to take the 7:01 with company x or the 7:03 with company y and eventually company X realises it needs to pull its socks up because their competitor is winning.

The tendering every 5-10 years doesn't work does it?

AllJoyAndNoFun · Today 06:41

Flamingojune · Yesterday 12:38

Thankfully not as common as traffic jams - in my experience

But often still faster, even with jams- eg to get to my parents takes 1:45 to drive, 3:30 public transport door to door ( 2 trains, 1 bus). This is along the south coast urban strip. The longest it’s ever taken me to drive is 3 hrs and that’s through summer traffic in Chichester and when the A31 was closed due to the fire so I had to drive through the forest. So even sitting in abnormally terrible traffic is quicker than PT running to time.

Re the cost, I already own the car. Unless public transport nationwide became as comprehensive as London I’d likely always have one, so the car is a sunk cost. My cost decision re drive or take the train for an individual journey is down to ticket vs fuel and parking plus convenience, and that’s currently hard to justify on most journeys unless you know where you’re going weeks in advance and can book the really cheap advance fares.

I want to be clear I’m not anti public transport as a concept. I use it where it’s convenient- if I’m going to London on my own I always get the train, for example. I just think it’s difficult to see where we would get the funds to upgrade the UK public transport system to a state which could significantly reduce car ownership (ie people think “I don’t need a car at all”), or fares to a level which would persuade people who already own cars to use them significantly less.

Benvenuto · Today 08:21

AllJoyAndNoFun · Today 06:41

But often still faster, even with jams- eg to get to my parents takes 1:45 to drive, 3:30 public transport door to door ( 2 trains, 1 bus). This is along the south coast urban strip. The longest it’s ever taken me to drive is 3 hrs and that’s through summer traffic in Chichester and when the A31 was closed due to the fire so I had to drive through the forest. So even sitting in abnormally terrible traffic is quicker than PT running to time.

Re the cost, I already own the car. Unless public transport nationwide became as comprehensive as London I’d likely always have one, so the car is a sunk cost. My cost decision re drive or take the train for an individual journey is down to ticket vs fuel and parking plus convenience, and that’s currently hard to justify on most journeys unless you know where you’re going weeks in advance and can book the really cheap advance fares.

I want to be clear I’m not anti public transport as a concept. I use it where it’s convenient- if I’m going to London on my own I always get the train, for example. I just think it’s difficult to see where we would get the funds to upgrade the UK public transport system to a state which could significantly reduce car ownership (ie people think “I don’t need a car at all”), or fares to a level which would persuade people who already own cars to use them significantly less.

We could transfer funds from the road budget - expanding roads doesn’t ease congestion (as is often promised) as due to induced demand it just leads to more people travelling.

Nottingham used a workplace parking levy to fund their trams - it was massively unpopular with opposition from businesses (who later changed their minds because the trams work).

It is just a question of choice - there are lots of politicians etc calling for various road expansion schemes across the country. Sadly, they are unlikely to deliver what is hoped & some are problematic (eg smart motorways). That money would be better spent on rail & other public transport.

I also think that a better way to look at it on a broader base than individual choice. Of course people want to drive - it’s the easy choice - but we can’t all drive as there isn’t enough space. As soon as there is congestion or other problems then traffic / transport needs to be managed. People will switch modes if another becomes more convenient. Certainly, where I live there are some people very vocal on social media re their right to drive - but even they tend to complain about schoolchildren being driven to school because the roads are too busy.

SwirlyGates · Today 10:49

People will switch modes if another becomes more convenient.

I got a free bus pass last year and due to this I have swapped car for bus for a lot of journeys within my city. I don't have to find parking (which is becoming extortionate in some areas), I don't have to figure out my route through the ever-more-complex road changes and roadworks, I can just sit and relax and read mumsnet. I am near a bus stop though, with buses in several directions.

I've also used it once or twice outside the city, but for most journeys the car is much faster and wins out.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread