Making a new post as this is a discrete point that comes up regularly here separate to that discussion.
Following on from the current long discussion about the rights and wrongs of a mansion tax, AIBU to pick up a few posters’ comments suggesting that the gentleman will have set up trusts to avoid IHT. I don’t blame the posters. This view is often put about by the media.
Firstly it’s highly unlikely the property has been put into any trust, we’re talking discretionary trusts here, that would “avoid” IHT. To have done that would already have incurred IHT and require him to pay the trust a market rent (taxable at 45%) to avoid further IHT on his death. And the CGT exemption would have been lost.
Secondly, discretionary trusts do have benefits for later generations in that their IHT bills are spread and can be planned for, rather than being paid in a huge lump following a death.
There can be debate around rates of IHT, but it is not true that trusts avoid IHT. Quite the reverse. I am not aware of any avoidance schemes that will now work. Everything peddled by what remains of the tax avoidance industry is now doomed to failure. Touch it at your peril.
Trusts remain a useful vehicle for asset protection, but not tax avoidance.