Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Influencers and Instagramers complaining about not getting enough likes

62 replies

LateSeptembersunshine · 28/08/2026 13:07

Feel free to scroll on by if you’re not interested in social media.

There seems to be a current trend of influencers complaining about people watching their stories but not liking their posts. Then I saw this video from a so called psychologist saying that lurkers are basically unhappy people or haters. That their followers should support them or piss off.

Aibu to think this is a really weird conclusion to draw and quite an wntitled attitude.

I must admit I love a bit of doom scrolling. It’s a guilty pleasure. I have an Instagram account but I don’t post anything myself, but I follow about 20 accounts. Of the 20 there are a couple of celebs, a few comedy accounts, a couple of budgeting type things and a few influencers.

Of the influencers I follow I watch their content because they generally have interesting content, but because of the algorithm I don’t really see their actual posts. Unless I actively look on their page I only see the stories. A coupe of them I Genuinely do love their content but their are a couple I follow more because it’s all a bit weird and a bit like reading a trashy gossip mag.

Aibu to think of you’re going to post constantly on social media no one is obliged to ‘support’ you or like everything you post. I’m talking about people who are making social media their living, not my own friend and family.

In the same way posting on mumsnet people will often read thread but not everyone is going to reply some just prefer to read stuff.

OP posts:
MissChanandlerBonng · 02/09/2026 10:51

latetothefisting · 01/09/2026 21:10

okay....

You seem to be tarring pretty much everyone who works in content creation with the same brush which suggests you don't actually know much about it...

I don't follow anyone who posts content about their kids or who sells stuff?
Most of the people I follow post about history or do comedy skits. Occasionally some decorating and recipes.

They may be 'grifters' but the etymology of that term is just someone who works hard rather than has things given to them?

There are a lot of things to dislike about social media and content creation but there is an element of meritocracy to it to that I like - the way that people can just build a platform based on something they are interested in and if enough people like it they become successful, but it's all on their own merits - they don't get the leg up of having a first from oxford or a parent working for the BBC.

Same with comedians - traditionally the main way to grow a following was to do the comedy circuits which are especially off putting for women - driving round the country to do gigs almost exclusively late at night isn't conductive to family life, and face to face heckling can be intimidating and verge on aggressive. It's very understandable how somebody who wasn't in a position to do that can shoot skits in their own home in their own time. I don't begrudge someone giving their dream career a shot.

That's the beauty of the algorithm - it shows what it thinks you want to see. If it's only showing you 'grifters' trying to sell you stuff and sharing their kids then that's because that's what you've been watching!

Edited

You lost me at ‘content creation’

EssCarGo · 02/09/2026 10:52

Why @MissChanandlerBonng?

OnlyUsername · 02/09/2026 10:58

You don't need to follow the ones who are particularly controversial in their sharing of their children's personal information as they normally end up in the headlines. I won't link to the Mail or Sun but this guy is the best example. It IS a problem.

https://www.mysocialworknews.com/article/the-problem-with-the-sacconejolys-is-this-father-exploiting-his-children-for-content

"Most recently, Joly and Saccone have come under fire for choosing to document their eight-year-old child’s exploration of their gender; 'outing’ their child to the internet, asking them to describe their transition, their feelings around gender dysphoria and utilising click bait titles such as ‘My Trans Daughters First Time at Pride *emotional” and “TRANS CHILD caught by ANGRY DAD.’ "

Notgonnalieaboutthis · 02/09/2026 10:59

Toxic shit all of it

latetothefisting · 02/09/2026 11:24

MissChanandlerBonng · 02/09/2026 10:51

You lost me at ‘content creation’

Why, do you have a particularly low attention span?

I don't know why those two words particularly draw your ire, at the most basic level artists are content creators, as are musicians and fashion designers and legislators and teachers - the vast majority of jobs in some way create 'things' for others to utilise or consume.

Or is it just easier to denigrate something you don't understand rather than putting together a coherent response?

Its fine to disagree with someone but "no I don't like it because I've decided I don't like it," doesn't come across as a particularly reasoned argument.

chattyness · 02/09/2026 11:29

I think some of them have a ruddy cheek making demands. They rarely follow you back , but one or two will and they make comments on a few of your photos calling you bestie etc 🙄 then they will quietly disappear and sneakily unfollow you, shallow AF

EssCarGo · 02/09/2026 11:32

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

EssCarGo · 02/09/2026 11:32

Oh hang on I got all mixed up there, ignore me 🤣🤣

EssCarGo · 02/09/2026 11:36

latetothefisting · 02/09/2026 11:24

Why, do you have a particularly low attention span?

I don't know why those two words particularly draw your ire, at the most basic level artists are content creators, as are musicians and fashion designers and legislators and teachers - the vast majority of jobs in some way create 'things' for others to utilise or consume.

Or is it just easier to denigrate something you don't understand rather than putting together a coherent response?

Its fine to disagree with someone but "no I don't like it because I've decided I don't like it," doesn't come across as a particularly reasoned argument.

From my point of view…I’m a photographer in a pretty niche field. Randomly and without seeking it out I got some free clothes for wearing them when I was on shoots and posting shots of me wearing them. They’re cool. They’re my style anyway, so it was a genuine thing.

I think some posters claiming all content creators are toxic etc is just a bit dumb; like everything else it’s a spectrum. It’s just a form of marketing 🤷🏻‍♀️

Jaxhog · 02/09/2026 11:57

Whatever next! If I really like something or someone on Social Media, I'll like it and/or comment. If I'm just passing through, I don't. I'm sure I'm not alone in this, and have better things to do than feed someone's ego.

WiltonGal · 02/09/2026 12:57

Most of the content is derivative these days. Someone comes up with something, they all copy it.

EssCarGo · 02/09/2026 13:59

True @WiltonGalbut it’s almost impossible to come up with something completely original working alone. Think of how many people are involved in the making of an ad for a company - dozens and dozens. Now imagine you’re the ONE person who has to come up with the concept and the story and storyboard it, write the script, choose the location, set the lighting, record it to a professional standard, then edit the entire thing.

People who talk about grift have no clue; it involves a lot of skill often for little return, and is more like graft.

Also the companies who use influencers aren’t looking for originality especially, but a good spread of distribution across their chosen demographics.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page