Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think the wildfire alert about barbecues was unnecessary?

379 replies

HollyhockDayssss · 14/08/2026 19:55

Oh My God Reaction GIF

AIBU to think the alert was unnecessary? I get wildfires are an issue but informing the public not to use bbqs isnt a life and death situation.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
ramonaquimby · 14/08/2026 20:36

its a lowest common denominator thing. Those it's meant for won't be bothered and will carry on regardless

MummyWillow1 · 14/08/2026 20:36

EweCee · 14/08/2026 20:05

I think it should used for IMMINENT threat to life - a national text message for this one would have been more appropriate imo. The alert service should be used for more immediate threats like flood, storm, war!!

So asking people not to be dicks by burning down half the country isn’t a national emergency?

I. Have. No. Words.

notimagain · 14/08/2026 20:38

MummyWillow1 · 14/08/2026 20:32

The whole country is a tinder box. How does this not affect everyone?

But the whole country isn't on fire.

Frankly, just my IMO,.if you're going to be ringing bells/klaxons or whatever in a household it should be for situations such as "you may need to evacuate now,.there is a problem locally"....it shouldn't be used for a nationwide "mind how you go".

If you have to send that type of message (and I accept there may be a need) I don't see the need for all the bells...it devalues the serious alerts.

MyDpsanarse · 14/08/2026 20:38

I live in an area popular with tourists, too many of them forget all common sense because they're on holiday, things they wouldn't do at home seem OK because they're just having fun and they've been drinking. If the message makes just a few of them think again then I'm all for it

Shatteredallthetimelately · 14/08/2026 20:39

This just proves to me that there are people out there that need reminding and can't manage to think about the dangers for themselves.

Zanatdy · 14/08/2026 20:39

It was absolutely essential.

Sherararara · 14/08/2026 20:39

AplineDaisies · 14/08/2026 19:57

The government do not do these for no reason at all.

Jeez how naive are you.
Let’s put all our faith in the government. They know what they are doing. We can trust them to have our best interests at heart.

Sereine · 14/08/2026 20:40

MrsPapillon · 14/08/2026 20:15

Then send out an alert in the Cairngorns or other areas where people are at immediate risk of death. The warnings are supposed to be to warn that lives are immediately at risk from a natural disaster or war or escaped tiger or something.

Surely they are able to send messages without the accompanying four minute warning if they just want to give us information?

Do you seriously believe the risk is limited to the Cairngorms? The fires have been all over the place, a random spark virtually anywhere could start a major wildfire. You may be sitting perfectly safely one moment and then be in imminent risk of your life if some idiot in your vicinity drops a match on the ground.

MustWeDoThis · 14/08/2026 20:40

HollyhockDayssss · 14/08/2026 19:55

AIBU to think the alert was unnecessary? I get wildfires are an issue but informing the public not to use bbqs isnt a life and death situation.

Why don't you go and ask the firefighters and military who have been called in to fight the fires, whether they think you're being unfair? I'm sure they'll have 5 minutes to spare outside of risking their lives to tell you.

hahabahbag · 14/08/2026 20:41

It’s an important message, houses are being destroyed by fire not to mention hundreds of acres of open space, some caused by bbq’s

if you are using one at home on concrete, fine, but it’s irresponsible to light one on dry land that’s combustible

anomymetoo · 14/08/2026 20:42

You clearly don't live in an area where there have already been 2 massive wildfires !

Sherararara · 14/08/2026 20:43

You aren’t wrong OP. It’s an emergency system to be used sparingly in times of significant national emergency. Which this isn’t. If it’s increasingly used like this,
increasingly people will just ignore it.

AlwayAnxious · 14/08/2026 20:43

HollyhockDayssss · 14/08/2026 19:55

AIBU to think the alert was unnecessary? I get wildfires are an issue but informing the public not to use bbqs isnt a life and death situation.

I presume you havent lost Land or a house over the last few months?

Just becaise its not effe ting you directly, it IS infact Life and Death

HewasH2O · 14/08/2026 20:43

Itsasecretnow · 14/08/2026 20:34

Yes, and iirc there were also other instances earlier this summer, before this current fire, where they had been found as the cause of smaller fires here too, not just this one. The affect to the wildlife and valuable ecosystem the NF provides is going to be immense and is incredibly sad. I think the people who are moaning about the alert and can’t see how serious the situation is are likely those who would buy and use disposable bbqs. They’re also very lucky to not live in an area affected. I’m not actually in the NF but not far, and it is somewhere I love, it is so varied and such an important area.

It's awful (& I'm local)

MrsOni · 14/08/2026 20:44

Sherararara · 14/08/2026 20:39

Jeez how naive are you.
Let’s put all our faith in the government. They know what they are doing. We can trust them to have our best interests at heart.

What nefarious purpose do you think the alert has then?

#tinfoilhat.

dhillan · 14/08/2026 20:45

I had ash landing in my garden yesterday from a wildfire 0.3 miles away from my home. I was pleased to see the warning. So many animals have died. People have lost their homes. People have been out having bbqs near us to watch the perseids, and will be again tonight. I feel the warning was sensible.

MrsOni · 14/08/2026 20:45

Sherararara · 14/08/2026 20:43

You aren’t wrong OP. It’s an emergency system to be used sparingly in times of significant national emergency. Which this isn’t. If it’s increasingly used like this,
increasingly people will just ignore it.

If a wildfire really got going it would turn into an national emergency pretty fucking quickly. That's the point.

AmnesiacsDream · 14/08/2026 20:45

YANBU.

Sending out the information was important. Using the alert when it's not a matter of immediate action to avoid loss will devalue it as an alert for that purpose. People will turn it off or not bother reading future ones.

Sherararara · 14/08/2026 20:46

MrsOni · 14/08/2026 20:44

What nefarious purpose do you think the alert has then?

#tinfoilhat.

Not nefarious. Incompetent. They are the last people you would want in charge of an emergency alert system. God help if they is an actual real national emergency.

HewasH2O · 14/08/2026 20:46

Ladysodor · 14/08/2026 20:25

The barbecues will be back on sale after the heatwave has passed, withdrawing them from sale is a temporary measure. I plan to stock up for next year.

Idiots bring them to the NF. They're not on general sale in the area since a local agreement was reached with retailers a couple of years ago.

climbintheback · 14/08/2026 20:46

What a daft thing to say - some folks need things in black and white! Those awful disposable bbq things should be banned.

AmnesiacsDream · 14/08/2026 20:46

anomymetoo · 14/08/2026 20:42

You clearly don't live in an area where there have already been 2 massive wildfires !

No. And the vast majority of people who received it don't either.

MrsOni · 14/08/2026 20:47

Sherararara · 14/08/2026 20:46

Not nefarious. Incompetent. They are the last people you would want in charge of an emergency alert system. God help if they is an actual real national emergency.

Edited

Ok then. So trying to prevent wildfires is "incompetent".

Right you are.

Itsasecretnow · 14/08/2026 20:48

notimagain · 14/08/2026 20:25

Agreed.

I thought the idea behind the system was to alert people if there was a serious threat to
life or limb in their locality.

The danger is if the system starts to be used for blanket announcements (no matter how serious the issue) people will start to cancel the warning without reading.

Human factors/accident investigation people can bore for hours with stories of accidents that were caused by people cancelling warnings without reading because they were getting too many low level alerts....and eventually they cancelled out the one warning that really needed attention.

There really needs to be a two tier system, one lower level for announcements such as tonight's, then a higher level one for "this means you, now"

That's certainly how it is done in some countries.

Edited

To be fair, then that’s on the idiots who have ignored the alerts - more candidates for the Darwin Awards. Survival of the fittest and all that, bring the national average IQ up very slowly 🤷🏼‍♀️It’s the emergency services/personnel and others that would be affected and put at risk by these fools that I would feel bad for, not those who choose their own fates in such a way. There should also be some fine/punishments for people who purposely ignore warnings.

And of course it can be a matter of life or death! You can see on this thread who has the privilege of not living near any of these fires or know anyone affected. To put it bluntly, they’re either ignorant, as thick as shit or never leave their own home town, ever, and have never heard of people that leave their homes and visit - or even (gasp) go on a thing called a “holiday” - elsewhere in the uk, especially in the summer. In 5 consecutive heatwaves. With hosepipe bans and in an official drought! So, no, why on earth would anyone need to be interested in anything beyond their own tiny town and life?!

Perplexed20 · 14/08/2026 20:48

AmnesiacsDream · 14/08/2026 20:46

No. And the vast majority of people who received it don't either.

So? Some of that is just luck.