Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Jason Arday scandal, part deux

826 replies

KatiePricesKnickers · 10/08/2026 07:09

As the book launch is coming, let the discussion continue.

First thread: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5563599-the-jason-arday-scandal?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share
This is lifted from the thread in the education section, which is an interesting summary
https://www.ian-leslie.com/p/the-great-and-unfortunate-story-of?r=8w0woc&triedRedirect=true

Or AIBU with not letting this fade away?

The Great and Unfortunate Story of Jason Arday

A One-Stop Shop For the Craziest Scandal of 2026

https://www.ian-leslie.com/p/the-great-and-unfortunate-story-of?r=8w0woc&triedRedirect=true

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Nameychangington · 18/08/2026 17:13

Whatwerewetalkingabout · 18/08/2026 14:51

I can't believe this thread is still up and the vultures are still circling even after the man has tragically taken his life because of speculation like this! Absolutley disgusting. You should all be bloody ashamed of yourselves.

RTFT, that one's already been tried and it didn't work

TheignT · 18/08/2026 17:16

Queenncat · 18/08/2026 16:00

He must have. He did his PhD viva a few days after his brain tumour operation.

I can only comment on the broken leg as I've had one. I'm quite fortunate that I've never had a tumour.

Sunnibee · 18/08/2026 17:17

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 18/08/2026 11:44

Don't forget he also claimed in a televised seminar to have been part of the TV series 7Up, which was demonstrably untrue the moment the words left his mouth.

To those claiming he wasn't a public figure, Simon & Shuster don't publish memoirs of non-public figures. JA claimed he received an advance of 1.4 million (but not which currency). Even that will have been a lie. You'd need to be of megastar proportions to potentially get that and potentially only for a second book after the first was an enormous success (the usual would be an advance plus royalties).

I actually believe the book was his ultimate downfall. There were already significant doubts which he'd brushed off with legal letters and the police. The book is already known to differ in many respects from what he's previously said about his life and there are more wildly unsubstantiated claims according to those who have read it.

He was no longer going to be able to carry on his charades. He was a fabulist with a deep seated insecurity or narcissism that required him to make himself seem vastly more impressive than he was. The book will have made it impossible to go any further. There was no way to stop it all crashing around him.

Without the book, the scrutiny would have died down. There's have been some scandal but he could have disappeared. The book was a step too far. The fallout was inevitable as, I suspect, was his end.

I don't like Cofnas. I think academia has many questions to answer. I think the media did overplay its collective hand but when you start throwing Carter Ruck letters around that pretty much tells them "there's a big story here, keep at it". While others played their part, at the end of it all the person most responsible for it all is, sadly, JA.

Wrong quote.

CreativeGreen · 18/08/2026 17:17

TheignT · 18/08/2026 17:16

I can only comment on the broken leg as I've had one. I'm quite fortunate that I've never had a tumour.

So it’s perfectly possible one could have brain surgery and defend one’s PhD the very next day

Sunnibee · 18/08/2026 17:19

Whatwerewetalkingabout · 18/08/2026 14:51

I can't believe this thread is still up and the vultures are still circling even after the man has tragically taken his life because of speculation like this! Absolutley disgusting. You should all be bloody ashamed of yourselves.

It's truly shameful.

TheignT · 18/08/2026 17:21

InSlovakiaTheCapitalOfCourseIsBratislava · 18/08/2026 16:15

https://humanlimits.substack.com/p/how-far-can-you-run-on-a-broken-leg

Quite interesting

Having done some quick digging, direct quotes say “broken leg” and other places report a femur

Yes I only found leg in quotes. Makes a big difference. I know.most peoples reaction is it's impossible to run on a broken leg but because of my experience I didn't immediately think that. People tried to tell me I didn't have a fracture as no cast and going to work, shopping, caring for disabled DH. Even the doctors in A&E didn't believe it was fractured as I walked in.

Mine wasn't a stress fracture, I slipped. Very small fall, family who saw the fall were surprised I insisted on going to hospital but I felt something was wrong. Was dropped in car park, walked in to hospital, after a wait I went through to cubicles then walked to x-ray and back.

TheignT · 18/08/2026 17:28

CreativeGreen · 18/08/2026 17:17

So it’s perfectly possible one could have brain surgery and defend one’s PhD the very next day

I am not a medic and have no.personal experience. Maybe ask someone qualified.

Mountainbetweenus · 18/08/2026 17:45
  • Bloke A allegedly plagiarises and lies in order to obtain a well-paid role in academia and a subsequent book deal.
  • University hires Bloke A for the DEI publicity and fails to perform proper DD.
  • A journalist uncovers irregularities in Bloke A’s CV, and reaches out to him to corroborate, and is threatened by the police and lawyers, and is accused of racism.
  • Bloke A’s employer belatedly launches an investigation into his background following ‘new evidence’
  • Bloke A resigns, presumably because he realises the game is up.
  • Bloke A commits suicide, for reasons known to him.
  • Bloke A’s University employer and others gaslight everyone, throwing out indiscriminate charges of racism, claiming Bloke A was hounded.

Impossible to blame anyone but Bloke A and his employer, unless you live in a distorted world, and have a pretty obvious agenda.

Gloriia · 18/08/2026 17:54

Mountainbetweenus · 18/08/2026 17:45

  • Bloke A allegedly plagiarises and lies in order to obtain a well-paid role in academia and a subsequent book deal.
  • University hires Bloke A for the DEI publicity and fails to perform proper DD.
  • A journalist uncovers irregularities in Bloke A’s CV, and reaches out to him to corroborate, and is threatened by the police and lawyers, and is accused of racism.
  • Bloke A’s employer belatedly launches an investigation into his background following ‘new evidence’
  • Bloke A resigns, presumably because he realises the game is up.
  • Bloke A commits suicide, for reasons known to him.
  • Bloke A’s University employer and others gaslight everyone, throwing out indiscriminate charges of racism, claiming Bloke A was hounded.

Impossible to blame anyone but Bloke A and his employer, unless you live in a distorted world, and have a pretty obvious agenda.

Yes and it is absolutely staggering that the only thing Cambridge have said is some lord or other parroting the old racist witchhunt crap. No accountability or even a teeny bit of self awareness whatsoever.

This is on them. You'd think they'd recognise that though perhaps the thought of litigation from students is too much to contemplate so they'll go with witchhunt.

Mountainbetweenus · 18/08/2026 17:56

Gloriia · 18/08/2026 17:54

Yes and it is absolutely staggering that the only thing Cambridge have said is some lord or other parroting the old racist witchhunt crap. No accountability or even a teeny bit of self awareness whatsoever.

This is on them. You'd think they'd recognise that though perhaps the thought of litigation from students is too much to contemplate so they'll go with witchhunt.

100%

Presumably, the faculty were feeling a trifle embarrassed when they realised that their wunderkind was anything but…

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 18/08/2026 18:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Nameychangington · 18/08/2026 18:11

Gloriia · 18/08/2026 17:54

Yes and it is absolutely staggering that the only thing Cambridge have said is some lord or other parroting the old racist witchhunt crap. No accountability or even a teeny bit of self awareness whatsoever.

This is on them. You'd think they'd recognise that though perhaps the thought of litigation from students is too much to contemplate so they'll go with witchhunt.

Cambridge University is woke central. There's not much chance they'll move away from throwing accusations of racism, they're fully sold on all the critical race theory/gender ideology/social justice warriors stuff. It's an ivory tower full of luxury beliefs.

CreativeGreen · 18/08/2026 18:53

TheignT · 18/08/2026 17:28

I am not a medic and have no.personal experience. Maybe ask someone qualified.

Stop being so silly

Queenncat · 18/08/2026 18:57

Nameychangington · 18/08/2026 18:11

Cambridge University is woke central. There's not much chance they'll move away from throwing accusations of racism, they're fully sold on all the critical race theory/gender ideology/social justice warriors stuff. It's an ivory tower full of luxury beliefs.

Do you think they're beyond redemption now?

CreativeGreen · 18/08/2026 19:15

I think people are going to tie themselves in knots on a hiding to nothing if they’re going to argue he didn’t tell some tall and untrue tales. To be honest I’m not mad about that - I think you probably have to be quite unwell to come out with that much fantasy and I suspect he wasn’t really ok

what I am bothered about is the process that put him where it did, and what I am certain of is that he was proactive in pursuing it too

Nameychangington · 18/08/2026 20:33

Queenncat · 18/08/2026 18:57

Do you think they're beyond redemption now?

I don't know.

The way some dissenters have been treated by Cambridge has been appalling. They've been trounced in an employment tribunal this week,and the way they've colluded in the bullying of the students who started Cambridge University society of women is shameful.

It'd taken a huge shift in culture at the top, and given how they've responded to this whole situation so far doesn't speak to that happening (though the head of the Education Faculty has gone early, she was leaving anyway and her successor already chosen so hardly a new broom). I'm certainly not holding my breath for sanity to be gaining any ground there any time soon.

Lougle · 18/08/2026 22:26

Something that's confusing me is this: from the video I posted above, Jason said:

"so i completed my phd in two and a half years working full-time".

Leeds Beckett University says that a PhD takes 3 tests years full time, 6 years part time.
https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/research-degrees-and-research-students/research-degrees/types-of-research-degrees/

So how did JA complete a PhD in just 2½ years while working full time?

LuckyHazelFox · 18/08/2026 22:57

ExtraOnions · 14/08/2026 22:06

Of course .. it was the Universities fault .. not the three weeks of harassment, in the media, an online - that clearly had NOTHING to do with it.
…you keep kidding yourself.

Still, he’s dead now, go and find someone else who lied on thier CV to harrass

Winder if you'd be saying the same if it were somebody you didn't like, who was constantly under public scrutiny.

LuckyHazelFox · 18/08/2026 22:58

Lougle · 18/08/2026 22:26

Something that's confusing me is this: from the video I posted above, Jason said:

"so i completed my phd in two and a half years working full-time".

Leeds Beckett University says that a PhD takes 3 tests years full time, 6 years part time.
https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/research-degrees-and-research-students/research-degrees/types-of-research-degrees/

So how did JA complete a PhD in just 2½ years while working full time?

There's no way that's even possible.

Nameychangington · 18/08/2026 23:02

Lougle · 18/08/2026 22:26

Something that's confusing me is this: from the video I posted above, Jason said:

"so i completed my phd in two and a half years working full-time".

Leeds Beckett University says that a PhD takes 3 tests years full time, 6 years part time.
https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/research-degrees-and-research-students/research-degrees/types-of-research-degrees/

So how did JA complete a PhD in just 2½ years while working full time?

I mean, you can save a lot of time if you plagiarise over 200 passages from someone else's thesis...

Like most of the things he said on the record, it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.Which shows how little scrutiny the things he said were under, until very recently.

Queenncat · 18/08/2026 23:08

Lougle · 18/08/2026 22:26

Something that's confusing me is this: from the video I posted above, Jason said:

"so i completed my phd in two and a half years working full-time".

Leeds Beckett University says that a PhD takes 3 tests years full time, 6 years part time.
https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/research-degrees-and-research-students/research-degrees/types-of-research-degrees/

So how did JA complete a PhD in just 2½ years while working full time?

Same way he ran 600 miles in 6 days..

LuckyHazelFox · 18/08/2026 23:10

Sunnibee · 18/08/2026 17:19

It's truly shameful.

Free speech is alive and kicking.

Lougle · 18/08/2026 23:10

LuckyHazelFox · 18/08/2026 22:58

There's no way that's even possible.

It's hard to fathom.

2008 - finished BA at St Mary's
Then MA in education at St Mary's - 2009? Possible
Then PGCE (Institute of Education) - 2010? Possible
Then MA at Leeds Beckett - 2011? Possible
PhD at Leeds Beckett...no idea when he started but he was employed by them in 2014 on condition that he completed his PhD by 2015.

WonderfulSmith · 18/08/2026 23:11

My mother, who is 75, runs 7 miles every day and has done so since she was in her 40s. She fell recently and twisted her ankle badly so went to the hospital with it. The x-rayed and told her that she had broken it. But she hadn’t broken it then, she had broken it about 10 years previously, she just hadn’t noticed and had continued to run 7 miles every day.

LuckyHazelFox · 18/08/2026 23:12

Everanewbie · 17/08/2026 13:55

I love how the all the lefties are now crying about how we shouldn't speak ill of the dead. The deaths of Ann Widecombe, Charlie Kirk, Margaret Thatcher deaths all come immediately to mind. All the commentators and talking heads that came on every political programme for "balance" crowing about how they aren't mourning the person.

Exactly and coming on here to say we should be ashamed. Brass neck springs to mind. They wouldn't be trying to shut down conversation would they?