Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we should ban private renting?

532 replies

honeyrosesandwich · 28/07/2026 21:51

AIBU to think this is a great idea?

Imagine if private renting was banned. All rented houses were done under social housing / housing association. There are already over 4.5 million houses rented under social housing, so it's on a huge scale already.

It would mean rent would be affordable for everyone and effectively help the cost of living prices. I live in a housing association house and my 2 bed is £520 a month. My brother, who private rents, pays £1100 for a 2 bed in the same area.

Repairs for my house are done by the HA's own company. I just put in a request online for it.

People that want to stay in their privately rented home will be free to do so but they put a ban on any new tenancies. The owners will have the opportuntiy to sell the house to social housing or keep it for themselves, but not rent it out further. If sold, the tenant will be allowed to stay.

I've been thinking about this randomly today and haven't come up with any negatives so far. Is it bad to monopolise housing? Well, there are already certain housing associations which own hundreds of thousands of houses.

OP posts:
Verysmalltimelandlord · Today 08:14

Personally I think a lot is the fault of developers building housing that people don't want or can't afford.

There's a large new build development in my city which is mainly empty and unsold because nobody wants to pay half a million for a house in the most notorious crime-riddled area of the city (this is an area of the country where that type of money usually buys you a lot of house). They then make special discounts, but only for certain groups, so first time buyers can get discounts, "key workers" can get discounts etc. Why not just make them more affordable for everyone?

Dutch1e · Today 12:04

Verysmalltimelandlord · 02/08/2026 19:34

Ok, so to break down some costs.

Here is an example.

3 bed house worth £200k. LL has 30% equity (a common minimum for a BTL mortgage), so they've put £60k of their own money into the house. They get a BTL mortgage to cover the rest. 5% interest is not uncommon at the moment, so they are paying £583 per month in interest.

The charge £950 per month rent, all of which they pay tax on because mortgage interest is not a tax deductible expense. A higher rate tax payer is paying 40% on that £950 so that's £380 they are paying in tax, leaving £570. Their mortgage payment is £583 per month, so they've got a loss of £13 per month.

Does that look like such a great return on there £60k investment? That same £60k would earn them £200 per month on a basic savings account at 4% interest.

Oh boo hoo.

The asset is the profit, the property that a tenant pays off for you.

You effectively pay 60k for an entire house, and wanting a monthly profit on top is just insanely greedy.

Loopylalalou · Today 12:33

Dutch1e · Today 12:04

Oh boo hoo.

The asset is the profit, the property that a tenant pays off for you.

You effectively pay 60k for an entire house, and wanting a monthly profit on top is just insanely greedy.

That’s also true even if ‘publically’ owned. Where do you think the money would come from?

Dutch1e · Today 12:42

Loopylalalou · Today 12:33

That’s also true even if ‘publically’ owned. Where do you think the money would come from?

What?

Verysmalltimelandlord · Today 13:04

Dutch1e · Today 12:04

Oh boo hoo.

The asset is the profit, the property that a tenant pays off for you.

You effectively pay 60k for an entire house, and wanting a monthly profit on top is just insanely greedy.

Which bit of BTL mortgages are usually interest only do you not understand? The tenant is not paying off the mortgage at all.

In the end BTL mortgages will usually be paid off from the sale of the house.

It would not be profitable in most cases for BTL mortgages to be repayment based.

justasking111 · Today 13:10

Loopylalalou · Today 12:33

That’s also true even if ‘publically’ owned. Where do you think the money would come from?

Then don't privately rent. You can put your name down for social housing and wait.

The fly in the ointment with that is that the homeless will need to hop ahead if their private rental is sold up. Or financial circumstances mean that they lose their home through divorce, job loss.they are of course priority.

Loopylalalou · Today 16:47

justasking111 · Today 13:10

Then don't privately rent. You can put your name down for social housing and wait.

The fly in the ointment with that is that the homeless will need to hop ahead if their private rental is sold up. Or financial circumstances mean that they lose their home through divorce, job loss.they are of course priority.

My post related to profit earned from money borrowed. How do you think developments happen? Taylor Wimpey save up before starting a development?
Just what your reply is meant to mean, I just don’t know. But if everyone stopped renting privately, how long would the wait for social housing be? Are empty owned properties going to miraculously morph into housing association owned overnight? Not likely, they’d be on the housing market instead.
(Shakes head).

New posts on this thread. Refresh page