Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel helpless about a large asylum camp in our village?

1001 replies

putupwhatever · 29/06/2026 16:15

My village has been chosen for a 1500 open asylum camp for single men. It will be an open camp (as the men haven't done anything wrong so aren't detained.)

The thing is the village only has 700 people and it is pretty isolated. it's about 10 miles to the nearest city and you can walk to another small village. There is a playpark, a pub and a primary school.

It has to go through planning, but the government have changed the planning laws so that they grant themselves planning and you can't see it as it is deemed sensitive. So they will just grant themselves planning and you can't oppose it without a judicial review--by which time it will probably be already open.

They want to reduce the number of people in hotels. But am AIBU to think that this puts the burden of sorting these issues out on one tiny community? Feels like we are collateral damage to be honest. The community will be outnumbered 2 to 1 and it feels too much. There is nothing for them to do or places to go. Also the fact that it is all single men put in one massive place with no money or means or anything to do is going to lead to problems

Apparently the camps cost £10 less a night than the hotels. But they don't count the set up costs which are astronomical (the one in Essex was £47 million to set up). So it seems like it's not not even cheaper than the problem it is trying to solve but much more expensive.

AIBU to feel a bit helpless? It seems so unfair but there is nothing I can do. We wouldn't be able to move from the village anyway as no one would buy a house here.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Tauranga · 29/06/2026 23:00

SkaterGrrrrl · 29/06/2026 22:21

Are you for real? Read a history book.

"British imperialism and exploitation in Sudan dates back to the mid-1800s, intensified into 56 years of colonial rule and led to civil war and the deaths of hundreds of thousands, as tensions created by British imposition of arbitrary borders drove a legacy of exploitation and conflict that left Sudan impoverished and war-torn."

https://www.stopwar.org.uk/article/britains-bloody-hands-sudans-ongoing-nightmare/ www.stopwar.org.uk/article/britains-bloody-hands-sudans-ongoing-nightmare/]]]]

They are here because we were there.

So what.
You realise that Idlamic countries are still using slaves? African ones as well?

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 23:00

smallglassbottle · 29/06/2026 22:49

I want to know how many British goat shaggers there are.

@smallglassbottle I just asked Alexa this question for you. This is her reply:

’The current population of the UK is estimated at 69.9m people as of 2026. I don’t have specific information about goat related activity within that context’!!

ISnoggedYourMum · 29/06/2026 23:00

JuliaBraverman · 29/06/2026 22:50

Is nomas a bot??????

Same username across many threads. I don't understand why she doesn't seems to comprehend the data we show.

nomas · 29/06/2026 23:01

JuliaBraverman · 29/06/2026 22:58

Britain, over 200 years ago, passed the abolition of slave trade act which pressured other countries to do the same. Yet it’s still all our fault and not those countries who have failed their people by making no progress due to corruption.

The UK abolished the slave trade because the Jamaicans riots chased us out of their country after having been abused for many years.

Don’t be deceived that it was through good will.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 29/06/2026 23:01

SpaceRaccoon · 29/06/2026 21:50

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2025/jun/30/sexual-violence-tigray-women-abuse-gang-rape-ethiopia-eritrea

These are the men I'm terrified to share a country with. Yet 87% of Eritrean men have their asylum applications approved, and they're one of the main nationalities arriving here.

Fucking hell and they are being given asylum ffs.

EasternStandard · 29/06/2026 23:01

Lavender14 · 29/06/2026 22:58

Of course they do. How else would they work? Have you any idea how hard it is to exist in a country where you've no income? No language? That's an extremely vulnerable place to be in life. Every asylum seeker I've met bar none has been working hard to learn English and to integrate. The thing that holds them back is the reception they get and the blatant racism they face. People here need to take accountability for their part in integration failing.

Including Rhiannon Whyte? A woman who made it her job.

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 23:01

nomas · 29/06/2026 22:33

Again, no one is importing men.

Why don’t you do something and go to Strasbourg and ask them to repeal the ECHR instead?

We will just vote for someone who will ban it immediately. Thanks.

daisybanks · 29/06/2026 23:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

bladeo13 · 29/06/2026 23:01

Rather than put them in a camp near to your village send them back and let them apply for immigration legally we all know that most would not be allowed in

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 23:01

ISnoggedYourMum · 29/06/2026 23:00

Same username across many threads. I don't understand why she doesn't seems to comprehend the data we show.

Edited

Yes.
Or paid.

Lavender14 · 29/06/2026 23:02

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 22:58

It is not an extreme view to say that I do not want any more asylum seekers in the UK...and I want the ones that are here, removed as soon as possible le.

This has been foisted upon us by wineries of the UK. Either home grown or other atates; or a mis of the two.

Other countries, Pakistan for eg, just deport hundreds of thousands of people.

No one says a thing.

Stop telling us what we can and cannot do in our country. Where there is a will there is a way.

"Noone says a thing"

Actually this is untrue and there are legal battles happening now to challenge the human rights abuses being perpetrated by countries who are trying to do what you've suggested. Because let's be very clear - to deny someone the opportunity to seek asylum, to deport someone who has made a claim for asylum that has either not been denied or which has been approved is a direct breach of human rights law.

Do you like having those protections in your life? Your right to the government not just coming to take your home off you tomorrow? The right to flee with your children if War broke out here tomorrow? If so then you do not want to undermine those rights. You can't undermine them for an asylum seeker without undermining them for yourself and future generations.

nomas · 29/06/2026 23:02

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 23:01

We will just vote for someone who will ban it immediately. Thanks.

Vote for you want, it’s a free country.

SpaceRaccoon · 29/06/2026 23:02

nomas · 29/06/2026 23:01

The UK abolished the slave trade because the Jamaicans riots chased us out of their country after having been abused for many years.

Don’t be deceived that it was through good will.

Edited

What an unpleasant lie.

Lavender14 · 29/06/2026 23:03

bladeo13 · 29/06/2026 23:01

Rather than put them in a camp near to your village send them back and let them apply for immigration legally we all know that most would not be allowed in

There are only 2 countries where you can apply for asylum before being in the UK. Anyone else has no other option but to find a way to get here in order to make an application.

rivalsbinge · 29/06/2026 23:04

ExtraOnions · 29/06/2026 16:18

People don’t want them in Hotels or HMOs, so where are they supposed to go?

The govt are reusing ex-military bases, as I assume this is the cheapest option.

Edited

Home is where they are supposed to go, they are not fleeing war.

Clavinova · 29/06/2026 23:04

nomas · 29/06/2026 23:01

The UK abolished the slave trade because the Jamaicans riots chased us out of their country after having been abused for many years.

Don’t be deceived that it was through good will.

Edited

the Jamaicans riots chased us out of their country after having been abused for many years

That sounds like a Rupert Lowe policy idea.

Lavender14 · 29/06/2026 23:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

This post tells me everything I need to know about you. Your world is very small and I hope it gets bigger.

JuliaBraverman · 29/06/2026 23:04

nomas · 29/06/2026 22:52

But not all Sudanese are corrupt. I went to school with Sudanese siblings who were refugees. They were popular at parties and had friends from lots of races/nationalities. They had happy productive lives before we lost touch.

Mo Farah is a refugee from Somalia.

Popular at parties has to be the sentence of this thread!!!!!!!

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 23:04

SpaceRaccoon · 29/06/2026 22:36

Changing people's way of life like stopping them burning widows alive? And nothing says "you're British" like cost-Colonial independence.

Generally though - I don't actually care. I don't want things made worse in the UK in the here and now, and I am not going to be guilted.

Edited

I don't care either.
My family were down a pit when this was happening, and some will remain there forever.

I want a safe and homogeneous life in Britain for my children.

glitterpaperchain · 29/06/2026 23:05

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 22:58

It is not an extreme view to say that I do not want any more asylum seekers in the UK...and I want the ones that are here, removed as soon as possible le.

This has been foisted upon us by wineries of the UK. Either home grown or other atates; or a mis of the two.

Other countries, Pakistan for eg, just deport hundreds of thousands of people.

No one says a thing.

Stop telling us what we can and cannot do in our country. Where there is a will there is a way.

Ironically your response is exactly what I am talking about

nomas · 29/06/2026 23:05

SpaceRaccoon · 29/06/2026 23:02

What an unpleasant lie.

From Wikipedia:

“massive Jamaican rebellions—most notably the Baptist War (or Christmas Rebellion) of 1831—were a primary catalyst that forced the British Parliament to abolish slavery itself in 1833”

daisybanks · 29/06/2026 23:05

Lavender14 · 29/06/2026 23:04

This post tells me everything I need to know about you. Your world is very small and I hope it gets bigger.

Quite big enough for me, thanks.

How many would you open your home to BTW ?

Freud2 · 29/06/2026 23:05

ExtraOnions · 29/06/2026 16:18

People don’t want them in Hotels or HMOs, so where are they supposed to go?

The govt are reusing ex-military bases, as I assume this is the cheapest option.

Edited

Deport them and then there won't be a problem. But it seems there's no real political will to do so. I don't know why we have to have passports- our borders are open. It's really not fair on the villagers - they are bound to feel unsafe, especially as in some African cultures they don't respect women.

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 23:06

Lavender14 · 29/06/2026 23:03

There are only 2 countries where you can apply for asylum before being in the UK. Anyone else has no other option but to find a way to get here in order to make an application.

So we are one of two totally stupid countries??

nomas · 29/06/2026 23:06

ISnoggedYourMum · 29/06/2026 23:00

Same username across many threads. I don't understand why she doesn't seems to comprehend the data we show.

Edited

What data? You haven’t posted a single source or chart.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.