Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question adoption checks after this safeguarding failure?

186 replies

User05677229 · 17/06/2026 15:24

I can’t stop thinking about little Preston Davey. That poor baby boy, taken into care as a newborn, seemed happy and healthy in foster care, only to be adopted by a gay male couple and then subjected to months of the most horrific sexual and physical abuse before being murdered. How did this happen? How did red flags get missed?

I’m a mum of two, and like many of you, I’ve always supported loving homes for children who need them. But cases like this shake me to the core. I’m not saying no gay men should ever adopt - that’s not realistic or fair. But we have to be honest: the data and repeated safeguarding failures suggest that male same-sex couples (particularly for very young children) need extra rigorous scrutiny, not less.

Social workers and adoption panels seem terrified of being called homophobic. So they bend over backwards to approve placements that might raise eyebrows in heterosexual couples. Fast-tracked approvals, ignoring instincts about motivation, lack of a female parent for a tiny baby - all while birth mothers are scrutinised to the nth degree. This isn’t kindness to adults; it’s gambling with children’s safety.

Baby Preston had injuries consistent with sexual abuse, multiple hospital visits, concerns raised… and still nothing stopped it. Eight missed opportunities, apparently. That’s not just individual evil - that’s a system that’s lost its nerve.

Can we please have an honest conversation?

Better psychological and background checks specifically for single men and male couples adopting infants.

Mandatory longer observation periods.

No more rushing through to meet diversity targets.

Social workers must be protected from accusations of bias when they flag legitimate concerns about any applicant, including gay men.

Children deserve the best possible chance, not to be experiments in adult validation. Every child in the care system has already been let down once. We owe them robust, evidence-based safeguarding - not ideology.

RIP little Preston. This should never have happened.

What do others think? Am I being unfair?

OP posts:
ScrollingLeaves · 18/06/2026 17:59

Badum · 18/06/2026 09:35

I could also find loads of worrying shirts about straight couples. Lots of those sites are things where you can print whatever.

I worked in a charity shop and we'd get all kinds of alarming "mummy should have swallowed me", "mummy doesnt only ride horses" type things.

A baby holding a rainbow flag seems the least alarming thing

It is completely wrong.

DesertIslandDips · 18/06/2026 18:23

myonly · 18/06/2026 09:21

I am aware that they shouted ‘boo’ and woke Preston up, but that is not sexual abuse, and without the other factors in this case on its own is unremarkable.

Sleep deprivation is a terrible form of torture-and as a former Social Worker, I can tell you unequivocally that what you refer to as "boo" is neither unremarkable nor normal.It is sadism.

SparklyHazelEagle · 18/06/2026 18:30

DesertIslandDips · 18/06/2026 18:23

Sleep deprivation is a terrible form of torture-and as a former Social Worker, I can tell you unequivocally that what you refer to as "boo" is neither unremarkable nor normal.It is sadism.

In the interview with criminologist Professor David Wilson, he described the sleep depravation 'boo' incident as torture.

Jellycatspyjamas · 18/06/2026 18:34

I for one am looking forward to an uptick in applications for social work training from all the arm chair experts in safeguarding.

ThePieceHall · 18/06/2026 18:42

Jellycatspyjamas · 18/06/2026 18:34

I for one am looking forward to an uptick in applications for social work training from all the arm chair experts in safeguarding.

Don’t be silly, they’ll all be too busy submitting their expressions of interest to become adopters or foster carers, given it’s all so easy and all about the queue jumping and the priority treatment. The 3,000 children in England who are waiting for their forever homes will be welcomed by them with open arms once they are approved and matched.

Runningswanker · 18/06/2026 21:06

Jellycatspyjamas · 18/06/2026 18:34

I for one am looking forward to an uptick in applications for social work training from all the arm chair experts in safeguarding.

Agree, I'm looking forward to retiring with all the newcomers who know the answers, looks like we won't even need child protection in a couple of years. We'll just have an army of female angels taking care of children with their innate maternal instincts and goodwill.

JoCoFin · Yesterday 16:17

Dear OP,

I agree wholeheartedly with what you say. I am not a 'homophobe'. I have nothing personally against people with same-sex attraction, but I do not condone the behaviour nor pretend that it is either normal or healthy for anyone.

ConveyancingHelll · Yesterday 16:56

ScrollingLeaves · 18/06/2026 17:59

It is completely wrong.

What is? A baby holding a rainbow flag?

Badum · Yesterday 17:56

JoCoFin · Yesterday 16:17

Dear OP,

I agree wholeheartedly with what you say. I am not a 'homophobe'. I have nothing personally against people with same-sex attraction, but I do not condone the behaviour nor pretend that it is either normal or healthy for anyone.

What does condoning same sex attraction mean?

JoCoFin · Yesterday 18:03

It means I don't pretend it does not have moral, psychological and emotional consequences.

Iarthar · Yesterday 18:06

JoCoFin · Yesterday 18:03

It means I don't pretend it does not have moral, psychological and emotional consequences.

What kind of ‘consequences’?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page