It’s obviously hugely complex, the risk/resilience arena. Two siblings growing up in the sane household will have different risk/resilience profiles because their experience is unique. One example is the sometimes protective factor of an older sibling.
Women are now (a bit) more able to access the same opportunities as men. Because we recognised the impact of the patriarchy and (white) male privilege. We raised awareness and changed systems. Still work to do but progress has been made.
Extra support for those without the same privilege as others makes sense if we want meritocracy. If we want as many people as possible to reach their potential. Prisons are full of people with varying degrees of developmental trauma. 90 % or so if I remember correctly.
That doesn’t dissolve adults of their responsibility and accountability or mean that behaviours should go without consequences. But the more we understand, the better able we are to shape a society that works for more people rather than just the privileged.
In terms of development traumas: My focus would be on peri-natal psychological support and much more resource going to families with children under three - really quality interventions that support parents with providing attuned parenting for their children despite their own traumas. Better access to high quality psychological interventions for adults. Better access to high quality psychological interventions in schools. More resource for Social Services to do more proactive and preventative work.
We spend way too much at end of a human beings life but really if we switched that the other way, we’d be far better off and we wouldn’t need so much later on. So much harm is done in the early years. I say this as someone heading towards later life at a rapid pace too. But that is what the research suggests.