It was not just Dewi Evans, why do people insist it was? There were several experts involved in giving evidence as to it being deliberate harm. Are you just listening to conspiracy nonsense to genuinely think he was the only one?
Even without that, the fact that her previous defense team entirely failed to defend her call the trial into question.
Forcing a very obviously guilty woman to call experts to the stand who will actively harm her case if cross-examined is not giving her the best shot at a fair trial. I wouldn't have minded seeing it though.
According to this-https://www.reddit.com/r/LucyLetbyTrials/comments/1raf7m8/full_transcript_of_profclarke_interviewrebuttal/
Shoo Lee has actually "misunderstood" another doctors work in his attempts to desperately find LL not guilty of any murders.
LH: So in Johan Smith's paper, he also talks about the research that's been done into animals, dogs and piglets, to be precise, which also, Professor Clarke says, bolsters the idea that it's possible for bubbles of air that have been injected into veins to move across the heart and into the arterial circulation. We also know, 'cause Professor Clarke's told us this, that Johan Smith, he's been in contact with him, and he also believes that Shoo Lee has misinterpreted his research paper.
Who to believe!
And for the stats lovers, you might find this video very interesting-
A pattern happening on that unit that was 80 million to one....