This is offensive and not remotely comparable, as you either know very well or, alternatively, you are trying to deliberately deceive people.
Jamie Varley abused and killed Preston. There is clear physical evidence of that; the injuries he inflicted on the baby which could not have occurred any other way and 999 calls that were recorded, spurious excuses and telling different people different stories about how injuries occurred, physical evidence from Preston’s post-mortem proving sexual abuse had taken place and photos and videos on Varley’s phone, taken and sometimes shared by Varley, showing him being abusive to Preston and laughing about it.
There is no evidence in the Lucy Letby case that any baby died from anything other than medical negligence by the hospital doctors and poor standards of medical care and unacceptable facilities and treatment by the NHS (hardly a shock to most people who have been unfortunate enough to be subjected to NHS “care”, and these were extremely vulnerable premature babies).
There is no evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that any of the crimes of which Letby was accused actually took place at all, let alone proof beyond reasonable doub that she perpetrated these alleged crimes.
If you have such evidence, please share it, because all of the “evidence” the prosecution put forward has been thoroughly debunked. Presumably, if they had some evidence that met the threshold, they’d have produced it by now.
This miscarriage of justice has wrecked her life beyond any prospect of repair and also those of the families whose babies died. Losing a child is trauma enough without falsely being told the child was murdered and later discovering that this was not the case. I understand the motivation to protect them from that last trauma, but continuing with the pretence that there was sufficient evidence to take Letby to court — let alone convict her — is absurd to anybody who has a basic understanding of science or statistics or the law, and eventually the families will have to be told the truth so protecting them from this additional, now sadly inevitable, damage is not a reason to keep someone in prison for the rest of their life when nobody has even been able to produce evidence that any murder took place at all, and there is plenty of evidence of other far more plausible explanations for the tragic deaths. Ever heard of Occam’s Razor? Do you understand the test of “beyond reasonable doubt”? In this case the doubt is not just “reasonable”, it’s the vastly higher likelihood by a huge proportion.
As for the CCRC, it’s a shameful disgrace to a country that holds itself up as having a high standard of justice. It is well-documented how dysfunctional and unjust it is. As someone who lives in the UK I find it terrifying that any one of us could find ourselves at the mercy of this “justice” system.