Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What exactly is the strictness in English schools actually achieving?

574 replies

WaitAMinutePlease · 11/06/2026 21:08

I’ve been on Mumsnet for years and one thing that genuinely puzzles me is how strict many English schools seem to be.

The thread today about the little boy with severe leg pain, and his mum asked if he could temporarily leave school at 1.30pm instead of 3.30pm because he’s struggling physically. The school apparently refused and said they wouldn’t “release” him. (Sorry? You won’t ‘release’ MY child??? WTAF!)

I see similar threads all the time. Parents being threatened with fines over attendance, children not being allowed time off for family holidays, requests for flexibility being refused, schools insisting on attendance despite medical issues that are still being investigated, and so on.

I’m Irish, and honestly this feels ridiculous to me. Irish schools are generally much more pragmatic. If a child was struggling with a health issue, even one that hadn’t yet been formally diagnosed, most schools would work with the parents. Reduced hours, work sent home, flexibility around attendance, none of that would seem remotely controversial. Equally, while schools don’t encourage term-time holidays, taking children out of school for a family holiday isn’t generally treated as some major disciplinary issue.

What I don’t understand is what the strictness is actually achieving. Ireland has a higher proportion of students progressing to third-level education than England by a mile (approx 76% vs 46%), so it’s not obvious to me that a highly punitive attendance culture produces better educational outcomes.

So my question is: why are English schools like this?

Is it government pressure? Ofsted? League tables? Funding linked to attendance? Or is it actually genuinely believed that this level of strictness benefits children?

OP posts:
FrippEnos · Yesterday 12:05

IMO schools are strict because they force in to being strict.
It used to be that if a pupil got told off by the school/teacher you would get told off when you got home.
Now if you tell a child off, there are many parents that are straight on the phone moaning that their child has done no wrong or what is the school going to do about it.
This is not to say that the school/teacher gets it rright 100% of teh time but there is now a disconnect between the schools and parents with the parents not taking responsibility for their children or trying to blame someone or something else.

Britneyfan · Yesterday 12:08

@Owlbookend you’re so right that in a way schools are between a rock and a hard place. Because as a doctor growing up in a middle class family I absolutely want my child to achieve well academically and to some degree will be judging a school on their results. However I also genuinely do want a more holistic approach with less focus on exams. I just think schools used to tread this tricky line much more successfully.

But I also recognise that so much has changed, including much more top down pressure on grades and attendance, and proscriptive narrowing of the curriculum. My son has had some brilliant teachers, as did I back in the day. I do believe the difference is that my teachers had a lot more freedom to just teach without such heavy focus on grades and trying to cram in so much of a curriculum that there is no time or energy left over for creativity or covering non-core curriculum areas that are interesting to teachers or students or both.

I remember my amazing History teacher would often set a whole lesson aside for us to have an extended debate on a topic, including topical politics (even though we were never going to be examined on that), and we all loved it and were really engaged in the subject as a result. Or we’d maybe watch a semi-related movie - I’m not talking about Star Wars or whatever, more like a documentary about the Holocaust that wasn’t strictly necessary for the curriculum. But it not only made us more engaged in learning but we genuinely had a broader than necessary background knowledge or specific examples to draw on for essays etc in exams, so I believe it did also help with our grades.

Britneyfan · Yesterday 12:10

@Differentforgirls ah yeah, of course you’re right about OFSTED. It’s such a nightmare it’s easy to forget it doesn’t hold it’s deathly grip over all 4 corners of the UK! Though there must be something similar elsewhere (albeit I think not quite so draconian) as my sister is a teacher in Scotland and was talking about a big inspection stressing everyone out. Not OFSTED level stress though!

Gealach · Yesterday 12:10

@FrippEnos i’m not sure it’s that different here in Ireland. When I was at school the teachers, were basically gods and my parents wouldn’t be questioning them.

But it is all different now. There is still a lot of respect for teachers but not like before.

FrippEnos · Yesterday 12:11

Natsku · Yesterday 10:56

Would you rather have less unnecessary conflict or more?

You are overlooking the fact that at the end of teh year the teacher is held resposnsible for the learning and grades of the pupils in their class, and that is one of the major reasons that schools in England are having issues.

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 12:11

Britneyfan · Yesterday 12:10

@Differentforgirls ah yeah, of course you’re right about OFSTED. It’s such a nightmare it’s easy to forget it doesn’t hold it’s deathly grip over all 4 corners of the UK! Though there must be something similar elsewhere (albeit I think not quite so draconian) as my sister is a teacher in Scotland and was talking about a big inspection stressing everyone out. Not OFSTED level stress though!

Yes it's the Inspectorate here!

KateSixer · Yesterday 12:16

So many things but it comes down ultimately to shared core values, politeness and respect.

When there is no longer a common societal agreement and implicit code that upholds these things then we get problems.

Many things have contributed to this but two of these are:

First, that a large number of parents effectively believe that it is no longer their responsibility to bring up their children decently and they see that as the job of the school.

Second, that in circumstances where there is no longer a general consensus in society around acceptable models of behaviour, that is kids come into schools without any respect for their teachers, desire to learn etc, the only way schools can respond to that is to make rules about everything.

People used to accept the principles of give and take. Even children did. Now, primarily as the result of bad parenting (and their parenting), it's just take take take, an insistence on dubious "rights" and a bolshy, sulky, dislike of the consequent rules.

Britneyfan · Yesterday 12:18

@Differentforgirls ah thanks! And to be fair my sister probably wouldn’t agree with me that she could have been any more stressed than she was then if it were OFSTED 😂 But as a GP I have had teachers coming to me more than once with suicidal ideation over OFSTED inspections, needing time off work to cope etc. Which really seems a step too far!

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 12:23

Britneyfan · Yesterday 12:18

@Differentforgirls ah thanks! And to be fair my sister probably wouldn’t agree with me that she could have been any more stressed than she was then if it were OFSTED 😂 But as a GP I have had teachers coming to me more than once with suicidal ideation over OFSTED inspections, needing time off work to cope etc. Which really seems a step too far!

That really does.

Schools here get plenty of notice tbh. Still stressful for the staff but Inspectors were teachers so they're really quite friendly.

Rainydays26 · Yesterday 12:25

Britneyfan · Yesterday 11:51

@countrylife00 Of course home plays a role in that too, as well as wider national and even global issues/politics. The recent report about the rise in NEETS emphasises how children and young people have not been prioritised in policy in any area since 2010 and that has a lot to answer for.

But we are talking about schools here. And adolescent mental health dips hugely compared to primary age, so we are talking about secondary school age, after age 11. Not that I think all kids have reached their full potential academically or in any other way and should be written off at 11 anyway (yes I’m a bit of a hypocrite for sending my son to a grammar in that case, but I’m in an area where the choices for state schooling are excellent grammars or failing academies).

I know a lot of children who have been fine in primary but had serious mental health struggles in secondary, and it’s not always due to their home lives. In fact many of these teens have very happy and supportive home lives. I’m a GP and I see a lot of teens really struggling with their mental health these days, and often for no obvious deep reason, as would have been the case when I first started out eg undisclosed sexual abuse or severe bullying etc. These days teens are super unhappy, and it genuinely often seems to revolve around school. To be fair these teens are primarily SEN students or likely undiagnosed SEN students who are just not coping with what is expected of them at secondary school in modern UK.

I’ve been a GP a long time, and it’s not something that used to be a thing I would see at all, but since the few years in the lead up to the pandemic it started to be a thing, and really took off during the pandemic once schools reopened, and has actually continued to escalate as an issue ever since it seems.

I just think as well as SEN being appropriately and genuinely addressed (which may well mean accepting that mainstream won’t work for these children, but then we need to establish more appropriate schools for academically able SEN students too rather than lumping them in with students with true learning disabilities who are unlikely to eg sit A-levels), teens in general need more downtime, less academic pressure, less authoritarianism at school and actually meaning and not just saying that academic grades aren’t the be-all and end-all, and that balance, even at times of extra pressure during exam years, is needed.

I am in total agreement with you over OFSTED achieving nothing except stressing everybody involved out! A bit like CQC in my profession.

100% agree with you. Thank you for this post 👍

MrsM2025 · Yesterday 12:34

Irish summer holidays start weeks earlier than English schools so less need for a term time holiday?

Gealach · Yesterday 12:40

MrsM2025 · Yesterday 12:34

Irish summer holidays start weeks earlier than English schools so less need for a term time holiday?

Loads of people go on holidays in term time in Ireland because it’s cheaper and less hot.

We don’t have a May midterm, this would be a great time to go. But people going on holidays isn’t really the root of the problem with school attendance. I feel like the whole fining thing is a bit performative. The root of poor school attendance has to do with mental health and less value on going to school since the pandemic . It about patterns that happen over a long period of time, not taking your kid out for a trip.

Sartre · Yesterday 12:56

EdithBond · Yesterday 09:22

I’m unclear what uniform’s even for. In the modern workplace, who the hell wears blazers? I’m surprised schools don’t still require bowler hats and spats.

My DS was at a strict academy when Steve Hilton was skateboarding into 10 Downing Street in his board shorts.

Lots of people wear suit jackets which are practically the same thing. Most workplaces have a dress code and some an actual uniform. Uniform isn’t a bad thing, being smart and presentable in a professional setting (of which school is) should be promoted.

Shuffletoesxtreme · Yesterday 12:57

WaitAMinutePlease · 11/06/2026 22:03

This is another thing! Fines being set by the local authority??? Like, if our local county council got involved in our children’s schooling, and tried issuing fines here they’d be laughed out of it. It’s just a preposterous thought!

Are schools run by the national government in Ireland then?

countrylife00 · Yesterday 12:57

Britneyfan · Yesterday 11:51

@countrylife00 Of course home plays a role in that too, as well as wider national and even global issues/politics. The recent report about the rise in NEETS emphasises how children and young people have not been prioritised in policy in any area since 2010 and that has a lot to answer for.

But we are talking about schools here. And adolescent mental health dips hugely compared to primary age, so we are talking about secondary school age, after age 11. Not that I think all kids have reached their full potential academically or in any other way and should be written off at 11 anyway (yes I’m a bit of a hypocrite for sending my son to a grammar in that case, but I’m in an area where the choices for state schooling are excellent grammars or failing academies).

I know a lot of children who have been fine in primary but had serious mental health struggles in secondary, and it’s not always due to their home lives. In fact many of these teens have very happy and supportive home lives. I’m a GP and I see a lot of teens really struggling with their mental health these days, and often for no obvious deep reason, as would have been the case when I first started out eg undisclosed sexual abuse or severe bullying etc. These days teens are super unhappy, and it genuinely often seems to revolve around school. To be fair these teens are primarily SEN students or likely undiagnosed SEN students who are just not coping with what is expected of them at secondary school in modern UK.

I’ve been a GP a long time, and it’s not something that used to be a thing I would see at all, but since the few years in the lead up to the pandemic it started to be a thing, and really took off during the pandemic once schools reopened, and has actually continued to escalate as an issue ever since it seems.

I just think as well as SEN being appropriately and genuinely addressed (which may well mean accepting that mainstream won’t work for these children, but then we need to establish more appropriate schools for academically able SEN students too rather than lumping them in with students with true learning disabilities who are unlikely to eg sit A-levels), teens in general need more downtime, less academic pressure, less authoritarianism at school and actually meaning and not just saying that academic grades aren’t the be-all and end-all, and that balance, even at times of extra pressure during exam years, is needed.

I am in total agreement with you over OFSTED achieving nothing except stressing everybody involved out! A bit like CQC in my profession.

I run a large medical room in a comprehensive. For 1600 pupils, my budget is £1000, which includes Emergency Inhalers and EpiPens. I work full time and see 50-60 pupils a day. The job has become impossible. I would love to spend some time talking to pupils, listening to them and giving them opportunities to vent, but there is little time.
I report safeguarding incidents most days.
Our GP parents tell me they wouldn’t do my job for all the money in the world and when I told one my salary, her reply was ‘ oh for Gods sake. Just leave. You cannot tolerate this’.
Parents expect me to be an A&E consultant, instructing me frequently about the failings of our school.
i spent many years as a senior sister in a surgical ward -that was easy compared to this. Budgets are so much higher in the NHS.
How do you as a GP help teens? Who do you refer them to? How much time do you spend with them?
Schools are in a crisis. My local GP practice is like a hotel in comparison.
Social media is a far bigger threat to students than schools. We genuinely do our best, but it needs to be a collective effort, starting with the parents.

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 13:01

Shuffletoesxtreme · Yesterday 12:57

Are schools run by the national government in Ireland then?

Surely they are in England too but the LA administers them?

CaesarAugusta · Yesterday 13:09

Sartre · Yesterday 12:56

Lots of people wear suit jackets which are practically the same thing. Most workplaces have a dress code and some an actual uniform. Uniform isn’t a bad thing, being smart and presentable in a professional setting (of which school is) should be promoted.

There are relatively few workplaces that require people to wear suits full time, unless they are client facing (and even then it's not necessarily viewed as essential). Dress codes now also are very wide ranging.

Uniforms are really pointless. People who have been in non-uniform schools manage perfectly well if they subsequently go into occupations requiring uniforms or very strict dress codes: it's not something you need practice in.

Qb2654 · Yesterday 13:13

I work for an IAS service. I have children on my caseload who are now on Tier 4 CAMHs due to trauma linking back to draconian toilet policies.

The super strict policies do not work. When a child can end up suspended for forgetting equipment then what is the deterrent for worse crimes? They may as well go the whole hog if they are being suspended anyway.

We had 4 under 7s through this week permanently excluded, one being a 4 year old. All 4 clearly needed support, and instead have been pawns in arguments between schools and the LA.

Qb2654 · Yesterday 13:14

And my own daughter's school has no uniform. The kids are comfortable. The kids learn well. The education has not declined because she goes to schools in a tshirt, jumper and leggings.

Boolabus · Yesterday 13:15

CaesarAugusta · Yesterday 13:09

There are relatively few workplaces that require people to wear suits full time, unless they are client facing (and even then it's not necessarily viewed as essential). Dress codes now also are very wide ranging.

Uniforms are really pointless. People who have been in non-uniform schools manage perfectly well if they subsequently go into occupations requiring uniforms or very strict dress codes: it's not something you need practice in.

And most go to university in between anyway where anything goes dress wise.

Rubuxus · Yesterday 13:20

I don’t know why everyone is making a big deal of pens.

When I was in primary school we were given pens. We didn’t take them home they just were the class pens in the middle of the table. Same for felt tips and pencils.

Secondary you had your own pens/ pencil case, calculator etc. But if someone forgot them it wasn’t a big deal.

igelkott2026 · Yesterday 13:24

Owlbookend · Yesterday 11:43

English schools are not all the same. My DD's secondary is nothing like the zero tolerance examples here. Nobody is getting detentions or isolations for minor uniform or equipment infractions.
Most students attend and engage in learning, but poor attendance and a minority of pupils are disruptive and defiant. The causes of these issues are multi-faceted and they are not purely the result of zero tolerance environments. Staff invest massive resources in trying to address them, but there arent easy answers.

I think there is a shift in how some people view responsibility. Some parents can be quick to point the finger at teachers if their child doesnt do well rather than examining their child's level of engagement in the classroom and studying at home. I am frankly amazed that so many people seem to think that secondary aged neurotypical students without the challenges of poverty should not be expected to turn up to a lesson with a biro or at least ask politely to borrow one if they forget. Draconian punishments are over the top, but encouranging students to take responsibility for there own learning (part of which is organising their own basic equipment) is part of education. Removing the most basic of expectations to avoid conflicts is setting the bar very low.

I think students should be expected to remember a pen. But I also think they should be able to ask politely to borrow one (either from a friend/classmate or from the school supplies) and not be thrown into detention or isolation.

If you forget a pen at work, someone will lend you one.

Not meeting deadlines for homework is different as you have to respect the teacher's time - ie they may have planned to mark it on a certain day- and you also need to learn to meet deadlines for the workplace, so that is different and ultimately if someone isn't doing their homework, there should be consequences (though again, the homework should be meaningful and not just set for the sake of it or because the Tiger Mummies are demanding it).

igelkott2026 · Yesterday 13:28

Interesting that Irish parents take their kids on holiday in term time. Aren't Irish school holidays a lot longer than the holidays in the UK?

In England and Wales you get 13 weeks a year when you can take your kids away so that's one area where I am with the government. And package trips to Benidorm in the most expensive weeks aren't compulsory, there are plenty of cheaper options. However, there does need to be some common sense where people are restricted in when they can go away, eg if they are in the military.

Qb2654 · Yesterday 13:51

igelkott2026 · Yesterday 13:24

I think students should be expected to remember a pen. But I also think they should be able to ask politely to borrow one (either from a friend/classmate or from the school supplies) and not be thrown into detention or isolation.

If you forget a pen at work, someone will lend you one.

Not meeting deadlines for homework is different as you have to respect the teacher's time - ie they may have planned to mark it on a certain day- and you also need to learn to meet deadlines for the workplace, so that is different and ultimately if someone isn't doing their homework, there should be consequences (though again, the homework should be meaningful and not just set for the sake of it or because the Tiger Mummies are demanding it).

Edited

Or, as an adult, if i remember I haven't got one i have the ability to nip to a shop quickly etc. We should not be penalising kids for forgetting, but instead encouraging them to use their common sense to fix the issue in the most appropriate way.

Owlbookend · Yesterday 14:00

igelkott2026 · Yesterday 13:24

I think students should be expected to remember a pen. But I also think they should be able to ask politely to borrow one (either from a friend/classmate or from the school supplies) and not be thrown into detention or isolation.

If you forget a pen at work, someone will lend you one.

Not meeting deadlines for homework is different as you have to respect the teacher's time - ie they may have planned to mark it on a certain day- and you also need to learn to meet deadlines for the workplace, so that is different and ultimately if someone isn't doing their homework, there should be consequences (though again, the homework should be meaningful and not just set for the sake of it or because the Tiger Mummies are demanding it).

Edited

Nobody is thrown into detention or isolation at DD's school for politely requesting a pen. If you forget you ask a friend or if they dont have one ask a teacher. If it kept happening, the teacher would talk to you & there is a minor chance you might get a negative behaviour point. Like I said not all schools have these draconian policies. I also think schools need to supply a set of basic stationary where families cant afford it (as noted on tbe thread some schools supply this). However, ay DD's school there still is a basic expectation thst students will bring the stationary to lessons. There is a middle ground between teachers taking all the responsibility and supplying everything & frog marching kids to detention if they forget a pencil.