Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

NHS now saying stuff is free.

310 replies

MixMaxChop · 04/06/2026 11:18

Dear Mrs Chop

Welcome to NHS breast screening. We would like to invite you for your free mammograms. We have made you an appointment in a hospital that is not local to you in the arse end of a city that does not have any access from the railway station and parking is strictly limited and none of your previous mammograms have ever been in this city before but that’s not the point.

Free??

A) it isn’t free. My NHS contributions have paid for this many times over.

B) Surely “free” is the whole point of the NHS

C) are they craftily prepping us to have to start paying for services now in a stealth move to privatise the NHS?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
ThreadGuardDog · 07/06/2026 20:04

Badbadbunny · 07/06/2026 16:15

Nail on the head. As you say, it's why many believe this is an "agenda".

So I gather you’ve never had a communication through your letterbox from a private health company offering services for which you have to pay ? If not I suspect that in the real world that exists outside the bubble of MN, you’re in a minority. The ‘agenda’ is to make sure as many women as possible take up the appointments because they are life saving. And that means distinguishing between something that you will have to pay for, and something that is delivered by the NHS - much of the time via private healthcare providers contracted in. This is a non issue.

Msmeowski · 07/06/2026 22:10

ThreadGuardDog · 07/06/2026 20:04

So I gather you’ve never had a communication through your letterbox from a private health company offering services for which you have to pay ? If not I suspect that in the real world that exists outside the bubble of MN, you’re in a minority. The ‘agenda’ is to make sure as many women as possible take up the appointments because they are life saving. And that means distinguishing between something that you will have to pay for, and something that is delivered by the NHS - much of the time via private healthcare providers contracted in. This is a non issue.

Edited

i have genuinely looked at charity reports and academic papers to understand barriers to attending screening. There are zero references to women mistakenly thinking that they might be charged so not attending a mammogram. This really is not a thing. The big NHS logo will be right there on the letter. There ARE references to numerous other reasons for failure to attend, one of them being proximity, another timing of appointments, factors the OP mentioned and embarrassment about nudity (see the link to the gown discussion upthread). When there are genuine reasons for non-attendance, evidenced in research, citing an irrelevant factor like it will somehow make attendance more likely is at best frustrating and at worse hints at more nefarious drivers.

Oxford university Breast cancer now
Hutton et al (2025)

Barriers to breast cancer screening

We explore why some people struggle to access vital breast screening, and what can be done to change this.

https://breastcancernow.org/about-us/campaign-news/barriers-breast-cancer-screening

Imdunfer · 08/06/2026 09:09

Msmeowski · 07/06/2026 22:10

i have genuinely looked at charity reports and academic papers to understand barriers to attending screening. There are zero references to women mistakenly thinking that they might be charged so not attending a mammogram. This really is not a thing. The big NHS logo will be right there on the letter. There ARE references to numerous other reasons for failure to attend, one of them being proximity, another timing of appointments, factors the OP mentioned and embarrassment about nudity (see the link to the gown discussion upthread). When there are genuine reasons for non-attendance, evidenced in research, citing an irrelevant factor like it will somehow make attendance more likely is at best frustrating and at worse hints at more nefarious drivers.

Oxford university Breast cancer now
Hutton et al (2025)

That is just a chat with a few women, not a proper survey. That report is completely free of any numbers. Did they even speak to any women who'd been sent an invite to a private clinic? Did they speak to any women who would want to admit to not having any money? Did they do any review of take up from different wording of letters? No.

We are just organising my husband's third life changing operation in under a year and thank heavens we have the money. I'm paying for my repeat DEXA scan soon because my GP won't do it until I break a bone.

I can't get my head around people making a fuss about the word "free" in a clear communication when the NHS cannot provide vital services to keep people living normal lives.

The complaint in this thread is utterly ridiculous.

Askingforafriendtoday · 08/06/2026 09:17

Imdunfer · 08/06/2026 09:09

That is just a chat with a few women, not a proper survey. That report is completely free of any numbers. Did they even speak to any women who'd been sent an invite to a private clinic? Did they speak to any women who would want to admit to not having any money? Did they do any review of take up from different wording of letters? No.

We are just organising my husband's third life changing operation in under a year and thank heavens we have the money. I'm paying for my repeat DEXA scan soon because my GP won't do it until I break a bone.

I can't get my head around people making a fuss about the word "free" in a clear communication when the NHS cannot provide vital services to keep people living normal lives.

The complaint in this thread is utterly ridiculous.

Completely agree with @Imdunfer
Ridiculous non-issue flagged up by the OP and others. The survey cited is superficial to say the least. And numerous private health compsnies use NHS colurs in their information giving and try to cover costs so use of the word free in the NHS very clear communication makes very good sense.

Bjorkdidit · 08/06/2026 09:37

Imdunfer · 08/06/2026 09:09

That is just a chat with a few women, not a proper survey. That report is completely free of any numbers. Did they even speak to any women who'd been sent an invite to a private clinic? Did they speak to any women who would want to admit to not having any money? Did they do any review of take up from different wording of letters? No.

We are just organising my husband's third life changing operation in under a year and thank heavens we have the money. I'm paying for my repeat DEXA scan soon because my GP won't do it until I break a bone.

I can't get my head around people making a fuss about the word "free" in a clear communication when the NHS cannot provide vital services to keep people living normal lives.

The complaint in this thread is utterly ridiculous.

No, that will be drawn from a 'proper survey' with carefully chosen subjects to ensure that it is a representative sample across a wide ranging demographics.

The information in the links is an easily readable summary illustrating the findings because many members of the public will not go to the trouble to read an academic paper.

The University of Oxford does not draw conclusions from 'chats with a few randomly chosen women'. You only have to look on here to see how misrepresentative that can be about just about anything.

Askingforafriendtoday · 08/06/2026 09:38

Out-of-Pocket Costs Are Barriers to Follow-Up Tests https://share.google/W7dbaSRXAo2FmdjjZ

This should make those of us in the UK thankful for the NHS and stop nit picking about the wording in the letter

And this, AI analysis will not be paid for by NHS patients

jheor.org/post/2330-mammography-ai-can-cost-patients-extra-is-it-worth-it

Imdunfer · 08/06/2026 09:48

Bjorkdidit · 08/06/2026 09:37

No, that will be drawn from a 'proper survey' with carefully chosen subjects to ensure that it is a representative sample across a wide ranging demographics.

The information in the links is an easily readable summary illustrating the findings because many members of the public will not go to the trouble to read an academic paper.

The University of Oxford does not draw conclusions from 'chats with a few randomly chosen women'. You only have to look on here to see how misrepresentative that can be about just about anything.

It still doesn't support the argument that some women would be put off by thinking that a letter inviting them to attend a private scanning clinic would incur a cost. For that they would have needed to carefully ask specific questions of women likely to be in that group. Which is pointless of course, so nobody does include that in the surveys, because it is free and the OPs Trust, at any rate, is sensible enough to say so.

Almighty fuss about nothing.

Msmeowski · 08/06/2026 16:04

Imdunfer · 08/06/2026 09:48

It still doesn't support the argument that some women would be put off by thinking that a letter inviting them to attend a private scanning clinic would incur a cost. For that they would have needed to carefully ask specific questions of women likely to be in that group. Which is pointless of course, so nobody does include that in the surveys, because it is free and the OPs Trust, at any rate, is sensible enough to say so.

Almighty fuss about nothing.

as @Bjorkdidit says, I think as reputable sources go, Oxford is one of them. There were actually three links. The third was a paper in a peer reviewed journal sampling non-attendees. I don’t think it’s a spoiler to reveal that cost or confusion over whether the test is free were not barriers.

@Askingforafriendtoday I am not sure of the relevance of the US references? Of course cost is a barrier to follow up tests in the US. This doesn’t make me ‘grateful’ for the service we receive, I’m not going to sit back passively and accept whatever is sent my way because it’s worse in America. If there is one thing that will send the NHS to the brink it is blind acceptance of its operations. It’s certainly not an email querying why the word ‘free’ is used.

The fact is the NHS welcomes feedback and has various ways to support that (PALs, healthwatch). So not only is comment free, it is actively sought. Fair enough, this phrasing didn’t bother you, but it bothered the OP, it bothers 40% of people responding here and there is no evidence it improves take up rates.

Imdunfer · 08/06/2026 20:32

Msmeowski · 08/06/2026 16:04

as @Bjorkdidit says, I think as reputable sources go, Oxford is one of them. There were actually three links. The third was a paper in a peer reviewed journal sampling non-attendees. I don’t think it’s a spoiler to reveal that cost or confusion over whether the test is free were not barriers.

@Askingforafriendtoday I am not sure of the relevance of the US references? Of course cost is a barrier to follow up tests in the US. This doesn’t make me ‘grateful’ for the service we receive, I’m not going to sit back passively and accept whatever is sent my way because it’s worse in America. If there is one thing that will send the NHS to the brink it is blind acceptance of its operations. It’s certainly not an email querying why the word ‘free’ is used.

The fact is the NHS welcomes feedback and has various ways to support that (PALs, healthwatch). So not only is comment free, it is actively sought. Fair enough, this phrasing didn’t bother you, but it bothered the OP, it bothers 40% of people responding here and there is no evidence it improves take up rates.

Those feedback mechanisms were set up to report medical issues not a squabble over a word in a perfectly understandable letter.

Has anyone on this thread suggested that the wording of the letter would put them off attending? I don't believe so, but if they said to themselves "it's not free, I paid for it through my taxes, so I'm not going, so there!", then they are idiots.

The wording of that letter has no negative clinical impact at all unless it decreases take up. It's a political complaint, not a medical complaint. Nobody should, imo., be using the time of any NHS worker to read such a petty complaint. I'm very pleased to read that the complaint has not been answered and I hope the OP has the sense not to waste anyone else's time.

Askingforafriendtoday · 09/06/2026 07:27

@Msmeowski

Uptake has reached its highest level for 10 years
https://www.england.nhs.uk/2026/02/women-attending-first-nhs-mammogram-hits-10-year-high-as-thousands-more-cancers-found/

So whatever the reason, and no one is claiming that the use of the word ' free' in the letter is the reason, this is certainly good news.

Just because the American experience doesn't make you grateful for ours it certainly makes many people relieved and thankful for the NHS. Passive acceptance is not required, fully voluntary consent to procedures is however: i.e. informed, freely given by those with mental capacity. So its your choice

NHS England » Women attending first NHS mammogram hits 10-year high as thousands more cancers found

NHS England » Women attending first NHS mammogram hits 10-year high as thousands more cancers found

https://www.england.nhs.uk/2026/02/women-attending-first-nhs-mammogram-hits-10-year-high-as-thousands-more-cancers-found

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread