Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

And just like that... MAFS is over

400 replies

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 17:03

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8pz1k4r2lo

It was coming. You dont get good reality TV without people suffering.

This news however is awful. Bloody awful.

A groom dressed in a dark suit and a bride dressed in white walk hand in hand along a sunlit grassy path, surrounded by tall green trees. Bright sunlight filters through the leaves. A large green Channel 4 logo sits to the left.

Married at First Sight UK 'brides' say they were raped by onscreen husbands

Channel 4 was aware of one of the rape claims before broadcast, but the woman involved still featured in the show.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8pz1k4r2lo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Helpfulhaddock · 18/05/2026 21:00

NotAnotherScarf · 18/05/2026 17:27

Not a bad thing. Big Brother was meant to be a one off social experiment. Then someone realises what they could do with it... Normal people for the first couple then complete arseholes who just wanted to get on TV to show how "wacky" they were.

Married at first sight....give me strength...I'm surprised the churches haven't risen up about the abuse of the sanctity of marriage

As for love island etc....complete choreographed.

I was thinking about this today. I think Big Brother set the scene for influencers etc.

People realised they could become rich and famous for showing their lives on screen, reality TV became popular, then the rise of social media meant you didn't need to win a "pick me" contest with Endemol or whoever, and viewers were already conditioned to watch "normal people"

Next thing you know we've got Mr Beast and Andrew Tate...

MillieTheMitten · 18/05/2026 21:02

I’ve not seen the UK MAFS, but given MAFS AUS is absolutely rife for abusive relationships so this comes as no surprise.

YooBlue · 18/05/2026 21:03

SpottyAlpaca · 18/05/2026 20:55

What a ridiculous statement. C4 are not the arbiters of the validity of the allegations. Nor are the BBC. That’s the police’s job.

Of course.

Which is what C4 should have said. That the allegations must be investigated by the police and C4 will cooperate with the investigation.

Not emphasise that their position was that “allegations were wholly uncorroborated and disputed”.

Essentially sounding like a defence statement.

Paytovote · 18/05/2026 21:04

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 20:57

Simply that Charlie was more liked and more in control of herself 🤷‍♀️.

Still i mean - none of them come off great!

Have you got them mixed up?

anyway back to original thread… just about to watch this. In some ways this is shocking and in others ways it was so obvious and I will admit to watching it and not realising that

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 18/05/2026 21:05

I only watched the original UK format and a few Aus/US episodes.

I was always struck by how many women would say something along the lines of "well, we were intimate straight away, but we're married!".

There's no problem with being intimate straight away or waiting until marriage - but it struck me as odd that they were justifying it by saying that they were married so it was ok to do it.

Makes me wonder if that's a common line they were fed by producers.

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 21:08

Paytovote · 18/05/2026 21:04

Have you got them mixed up?

anyway back to original thread… just about to watch this. In some ways this is shocking and in others ways it was so obvious and I will admit to watching it and not realising that

No aha but i'm fine with noone agreeing on that one

OP posts:
REDB99 · 18/05/2026 21:22

TipsyLaird · 18/05/2026 18:08

This programme has changed totally from when it was first made. I remember watching the first couple of series probably 10-15 years ago and it was quite gentle, quite documentary style, lots about matching people up and the way they made their choices of pairings.

Then it seemed to morph into something a lot different, aimed at shocking, not interested in finding matches but finding conflict, stirring it up.

I remember this, it was almost more presented as seeing if the ‘experts’ got their pairings right. It was not about seeking fame and was more of a look to see if psychology and personality analysis could help find a life partner. I never watched it beyond the first series and I’m glad now!

Crispsandredwine · 18/05/2026 21:26

This show was always about shameful exploitation. I can’t believe anyone is surprised with the outcome.

PleaseAccepyMyUserNames · 18/05/2026 21:27

It has really pissed me off, now I've watched the Panorama, that it has taken these ladies coming forward to start the wheels in motion.
My friend played me some catch up MAFS AUS once and I was genuinely horrified by

  • the blatant gaslighting of contestants
  • the aggression and violence
  • the vile misogyny that seemed to go unremarked and unchecked
  • the deliberate pairing of unsuitable couples
  • deliberate casting of seriously fucked up, disgusting individuals and the resultant abuse
  • the pandering to the 'experts' when they had a 'successful coupling' rate of <0.2% if my maths are correct (Seriously, those 'experts' are a bunch of self -serving souless you know whats).
And apparently this was all fine, just excellent TV,; it's just that now, 3 ladies are threatening C4 and CPL with lawyers and suddenly everyone sees the problem?!
YooBlue · 18/05/2026 21:35

I am pretty sure that if I was an expert psychologist / therapist I would refuse to work on anything like MAFS on ethical grounds.

But then vets supervise abattoirs.

JWhipple · 18/05/2026 21:43

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 17:31

Yeah true

Will have to find something else to occupy my time now that reality tv is all but over 😭

Oh no, I'm so sorry those programmes aren't allowed to be manipulative and exploitative and unable to safeguard people on them from being raped and now you have nothing to watch because apparently your TV only shows shitty reality TV shows

Jesus Christ WTAF is wrong with you.

Totalmayhem · 18/05/2026 21:46

I’m sure the op will consider me a boring prude but I’m afraid imho these programmes are degenerate shite. They objectify women in a disgusting way and then they act surprised when something like this happens. Just grim.

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 21:47

JWhipple · 18/05/2026 21:43

Oh no, I'm so sorry those programmes aren't allowed to be manipulative and exploitative and unable to safeguard people on them from being raped and now you have nothing to watch because apparently your TV only shows shitty reality TV shows

Jesus Christ WTAF is wrong with you.

Tyra Banks Wtf GIF

Do calm down

Ive said throughout the thread that this is awful.

OP posts:
ThornsInACheapBouquet · 18/05/2026 22:02

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 17:31

Yeah true

Will have to find something else to occupy my time now that reality tv is all but over 😭

You say that you say this when posting a news article about abuse and rape and the end of reality tv.

then you say Charlie was the abuser when it was proved on camera how Eve was manipulating other contestants against Charlie. Even the contestant that hated Charlie the most due to Eve apologised when confronted with the truth. (Edited to add: was Polly)

im hoping you are on a wind up

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 22:12

ThornsInACheapBouquet · 18/05/2026 22:02

You say that you say this when posting a news article about abuse and rape and the end of reality tv.

then you say Charlie was the abuser when it was proved on camera how Eve was manipulating other contestants against Charlie. Even the contestant that hated Charlie the most due to Eve apologised when confronted with the truth. (Edited to add: was Polly)

im hoping you are on a wind up

Edited

We dont agree on eve vs Charlie, which is fine

But I think ive very clearly said that this news is bloody awful!

It does spell the end of mafsuk, likely, or at least the drama of it all, which was what kept ud all hooked - that is a shame. But not the disgusting allegations.

OP posts:
BillieWiper · 18/05/2026 22:14

I always thought they deliberately paired misogynistic thuggy men with vulnerable women completely unsuited to having any kind of relationship just to get 'good tv'.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 18/05/2026 22:16

the80sweregreat · 18/05/2026 18:14

I remember the original shows and it had a scientific feel to it. I only watched a few, but most split up within weeks. There didn’t seem to be anything bad happening, but it did feel odd that anyone would want to do this based on a few tests and random strangers deciding you would be a good match. I haven’t watched any of the new ones though.
Feel for the women involved in this latest scandal.

I will admit I have never seen MAFS but I have always been a bit surprised that it was always touted as a "groundbreaking" show.

I can vividly remember the radio station doing two strangers and a wedding back in the 90s complete with obligatory documentary (the bride actually split from the random she married and shacked up with Jeremy Kyle instead, so there's no accounting for taste!). So it wasn't new and had already been done.

That said, obviously I hope everyone who was been abused in the name of "entertainment" is being properly supported.

EdithBond · 18/05/2026 22:19

OMG, ‘Lizzie’ was threatened with acid and raped!

Mossey55 · 18/05/2026 22:24

Who in their right mind would go on mafs and expect it to be all nice and romantic . Desperate idiots or wannabes

Nogimachi · 18/05/2026 22:25

I think they should ban these shows. It’s unlikely that anyone who isn’t in some way vulnerable is going to participate in something where you marry and therefore have sex with someone you’ve only just met. There’s a clear and obvious risk here.

ChocolateAddictAlways · 18/05/2026 22:29

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 18/05/2026 21:05

I only watched the original UK format and a few Aus/US episodes.

I was always struck by how many women would say something along the lines of "well, we were intimate straight away, but we're married!".

There's no problem with being intimate straight away or waiting until marriage - but it struck me as odd that they were justifying it by saying that they were married so it was ok to do it.

Makes me wonder if that's a common line they were fed by producers.

Yes. I've only watched 1 series fully but there is a weird pre-occupation with getting all the couples to start sleeping together almost immediately. It's so contradictory to sex positive messages about willing consent, respecting a partner's decision to not be intimate etc. And couples who waited or had issues regarding delayed intimacy were looked upon as immediate failures.

Cooshawn · 18/05/2026 22:30

I don't see it as any travesty for a reality TV show which served as a vehicle to abuse and rape women to end.

That the women made the production company aware and they did nothing is absolutely deplorable and should be a criminal offence.

Lalgarh · 18/05/2026 22:31

Sex positive should mean willing consent but it now means pushing boundaries BC experimenting which means you are achieving personal growth

ruethewhirl · 18/05/2026 22:31

Raccoonsmacaroons · 18/05/2026 20:34

I’d REALLY like this to be the death knell for Virgin Island, too. I find that programme horrifying.

OMG yes, I was just thinking the same. I've only seen the trailers as I refuse to watch it on principle, but it looks like the epitome of exploitative and just every kind of wrong, however they try to dress it up that they're helping people(!) It really feels like E4 are scraping the barrel with that one.

Swipe left for the next trending thread