Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Angela Rayner's tax affairs

319 replies

Ihateboris · 14/05/2026 08:10

I was a few days late submitting my Tax Return due to being in hospital last year and as result I was charged £100 late filing penalty.

AIBU to think that Angela Rayner should have to pay interest and penalties for underpayment of Stamp Duty. This makes me so fucking angry.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Ihateboris · 14/05/2026 10:48

Lomonald · 14/05/2026 10:46

Did you not get the multiple emails and texts they send before the end of the tax year? Did you not appeal the "fine" Angela Rayner has been investigated and cleared and paid her underpayment I don't think there is anything you need to be this angry about just do your taxes or get an accountant to do them in plenty of time.

Please read the full thread

OP posts:
Smeuse · 14/05/2026 10:50

MissMoneyFairy · 14/05/2026 08:33

Amazing coincidence isn't it that she decides to announce it today on the early morning news before hmrc offices were even open, j alsoa coincidence about Farage being investigated too, spin spin spin. They must think we're stupid.

She was informed a few days ago.

So yes, stupid comment about the offices not being open.

Do you thik Farage should not be investigated?

C8H10N4O2 · 14/05/2026 10:56

YowieeF · 14/05/2026 10:47

Don’t believe everything you see on Social media. Rayner has paid up, it wasn’t an avoidance it was a mistake. Jack Polanski - even his local council weren’t sure of the rules… yet we had months of news paper comments on Rayner and they’re still going after Polanski.

but 5 million from a Thai business man is okay…

at least this shows who is owned by the media.

Oh come on, Rayner’s situation was genuinely very complex - stamp duty rules in her situation have very few experts even in HMRC.

There is no comparison with the rules on council tax on houseboats which has more variations than brick houses but is really not that complex (type of mooring was the main variable from memory).

lazyarse123 · 14/05/2026 11:02

Bavariamaria · 14/05/2026 08:19

You could have submitted to HMRC your reason for late submission and requested a refund of the fine. There is a very high chance they would have accepted it, given your hospital stay.

The trust arrangements with her son sound very complex. Her error has been the naivety in not getting specialist advice.

Edited

She was told to get specialist tax advice and didn't bother. If she didn't do due diligence for her own affairs how could she be trusted to do it for the country?

pointythings · 14/05/2026 11:02

1dayatatime · 14/05/2026 10:32

It really has absolutely nothing to do with her being a woman or her background and everything to do with her being completely crap and totally not up to the job.

No one cares that Streeting is gay, no one cares that Andy Burnham's parents were a telephone engineer and a receptionist and working class.
Yvette Cooper is the cleverest of all the potential candidates and it's irrelevant that she is a woman.

But AR is crap, not up to the job and a "Labour Liz Truss".

That is your opinion. You are entitled to it, and you know what they say about opinions.

Clavinova · 14/05/2026 11:04

LizzieSiddal · 14/05/2026 09:40

I recently had an investigation with HMRC. It went on for 5 months and was hugely stressful.
I had made a mistake and owed money. However because I had been totally transparent during the investigation and had made a genuine mistake, I was not fined anything or made to pay interest.

It actually states in the info you get at the beginning of the investigation that how you behave during it can determine if you are made to pay interest or a fine. It’s there for all to see and obviously not uncommon.

How do you know that Angela Rayner has not paid interest?

Did you ignore suggestions and recommendations to seek specialist tax advice?

Her conveyancer and a trusts lawyer had both told her standard rate applied – but both had explicitly said this was not specialist tax advice. One "suggested" she obtain specialist tax advice; the other "recommended" it. However Ms Rayner did not obtain tax advice.

Marmalademorning · 14/05/2026 11:04

What gets me is that she’s cleared by the tax man just right at the time she announces her leadership challenge. It absolutely stinks. God help us if we end up with her as PM.

BIossomtoes · 14/05/2026 11:10

Marmalademorning · 14/05/2026 11:04

What gets me is that she’s cleared by the tax man just right at the time she announces her leadership challenge. It absolutely stinks. God help us if we end up with her as PM.

I tell you what stinks and that’s HMRC taking eight months to deal with it.

crazycrofter · 14/05/2026 11:10

She will definitely have had to pay interest.

Penalties for errors are connected to whether it was deliberate, careless or made in good faith. They can also be deferred. Penalties for errors are different to penalties for late filing - if you knew you had to file and you were late, you get a penalty. That’s a different situation to making a payment of tax but paying the wrong amount - in those circumstances HMRC make a judgment about your intentions and your behaviour.

FinchiePink · 14/05/2026 11:14

BIossomtoes · 14/05/2026 11:10

I tell you what stinks and that’s HMRC taking eight months to deal with it.

HMRC is seriously understaffed at the moment, especially within the more 'niche' taxes like complex IHT and SDLT. They're also seriously under-resourced and not really prepared for the new MTD requirements and increasingly complex IHT legislation.

Everything is taking so much longer than it should. I've been trying to get them to send a client their final IHT calculation since August last year when they closed their enquiry, for example.

Even UTRs are taking longer than usual at the moment

Araminta1003 · 14/05/2026 11:23

HMRC and Zac Polanski’s Council are also Government? They are all part of the same system and problem!
Tax rules should never be so complicated that senior politicians can get them wrong. It is the job of senior politicians to change that!
They clearly choose not to because they know they can get out of it and the rest of us can’t.

BIossomtoes · 14/05/2026 11:24

Local government and government aren’t the same thing at all.

MissMoneyFairy · 14/05/2026 11:26

Smeuse · 14/05/2026 10:50

She was informed a few days ago.

So yes, stupid comment about the offices not being open.

Do you thik Farage should not be investigated?

Another sister says she was only informed yesterday

FinchiePink · 14/05/2026 11:26

Araminta1003 · 14/05/2026 11:23

HMRC and Zac Polanski’s Council are also Government? They are all part of the same system and problem!
Tax rules should never be so complicated that senior politicians can get them wrong. It is the job of senior politicians to change that!
They clearly choose not to because they know they can get out of it and the rest of us can’t.

Tax rules have to be complicated because life is complicated and so are people and their businesses.

Simplifying tax rules will only get you two places - either unnecessarily high and punitive or so open to avoidance and loop holes that you may as well not bother.

Tax is law. Law is complex by necessity.

MissMoneyFairy · 14/05/2026 11:26

Poster not sister

Chiachomp · 14/05/2026 11:31

lazyarse123 · 14/05/2026 11:02

She was told to get specialist tax advice and didn't bother. If she didn't do due diligence for her own affairs how could she be trusted to do it for the country?

Do you know how much that would have cost? Definitely well into 4 figures, if not 5. Would you have bothered?

TheHateIsNotGood · 14/05/2026 11:33

I think it's a bit of a 'rum deal' too but the answer lies in the words "tax avoidance" in the message because it's specifically that for which she hasn't received a penalty.

Doesn't necessarily mean she won't be paying any back tax plus interest with a little £100 fine chucked in.

askmenow · 14/05/2026 11:39

Weeeellll don't you know! All civil servants in hoc to his Maj's government. One rule for us and another for "them"

Now we need the overvaluing of her northern home to be investigated and the theft of funds from her disabled sons estate.... Now that reeelllly stinks 💩

darksideofthetoon · 14/05/2026 11:40

It’s a terrifying thought that someone as low calibre and stupid as Rayner may soon be in charge of running our country. The woman is an obvious narcissistic, half-wit whose only interest is herself.

Replacing Starmer with her would be going from bad to horrendous.

Marmalademorning · 14/05/2026 12:38

darksideofthetoon · 14/05/2026 11:40

It’s a terrifying thought that someone as low calibre and stupid as Rayner may soon be in charge of running our country. The woman is an obvious narcissistic, half-wit whose only interest is herself.

Replacing Starmer with her would be going from bad to horrendous.

It will make the UK an absolute laughing stock (as if that isn’t the case already).

Marmalademorning · 14/05/2026 12:39

BIossomtoes · 14/05/2026 11:10

I tell you what stinks and that’s HMRC taking eight months to deal with it.

Do you honestly think it’s sheer coincidence that she’s just been cleared now? Just at the moment she launches her leadership challenge. I don’t.

lazyarse123 · 14/05/2026 12:42

Chiachomp · 14/05/2026 11:31

Do you know how much that would have cost? Definitely well into 4 figures, if not 5. Would you have bothered?

If I was in her position of wanting to run the country yes I would. She's had a lot to say about other politicians who have played the system and been found out.

MissMoneyFairy · 14/05/2026 12:46

Marmalademorning · 14/05/2026 12:39

Do you honestly think it’s sheer coincidence that she’s just been cleared now? Just at the moment she launches her leadership challenge. I don’t.

I would if she posts a copy of the letter showing the date

pointythings · 14/05/2026 12:48

MissMoneyFairy · 14/05/2026 12:46

I would if she posts a copy of the letter showing the date

If you are going to do that, you need to extend that kind of intrusive disclosure to all politicians, not just the ones you don't like.

Backedoffhackedoff · 14/05/2026 12:52

I don’t really understand the point - if there is no wrongdoing why would she pay fines/ interest? They are mutually exclusive.