i agree with this.
there is absolutely no excuse for ‘not knowing’ - the changes were widely advertised, those affected were specifically informed too. If these women didn’t bother opening or reading letters addressed to them about the state pension, if they ignored all the announcements and mortifications about it then that’s on them. It was virtually impossible to ignore the fact that the pension age was rising.
When I started work, the state pension age for women was 60. It was later changed (quite rightly, to be equitable with men) to 65. Further legislation (absolutely necessary for affordability) means that I now won’t get a state pension until I’m 67. So guess what? I’ve continued working full time, I manage my finances and don’t moan about it because I understand the reasons behind the reforms and I’ve kept myself informed.
The WASPI women are an embarrassment. The claim to ‘not know’ information that was widely announced is ludicrous. I suspect the reality is that they just didn’t want to carry on working, or had spent years working part time so hadn’t made decent provision themselves.
State pension reforms have affected everyone …. men who would have always expected to retire at 65 (unfair in the first place that they were expected to wait five years longer than women!) are now having to wait until 66,67,68…..
These women need to shut up now, they aren’t going to get anywhere with this latest outcry anyway and it’s now very transparently just an excuse for not having bothered to keep themselves informed and take personal responsibility