Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we don’t know how lucky we are under Starmer.

404 replies

SevenYellowHammers · 11/05/2026 19:50

Russia have a mad despot who is responsible for the deaths of Russians and Ukrainians and has caused untold damage on the world’s environment and economy. But he’s still in power.

The USA have a mad despot who’s causing deaths worldwide and has started a war he can’t win causing untold damage to the world’s economy and environment. But he’s still in power.

Israel have a mad despot who is committing genocide and putting Jewish people at risk across the world. But he’s still in power.

In the UK, we have a dull bloke who’s doing his best to stand up to the mad despots while not leading us into war. And we’re all trying to get rid of him.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
SevenYellowHammers · 11/05/2026 23:25

Whatafustercluck · 11/05/2026 23:16

I've said this all along. KS has a PR problem. Blair also had Alistair Campbell.

And to people talking about Ed Milliband as a good possible successor: all The Sun had to do was print a front page picture of the man eating a bacon roll on election day to put people off voting Labour.

Whoever replaces KS is already on borrowed time.

Depressingly, you’re so right

OP posts:
SevenYellowHammers · 11/05/2026 23:27

MushMonster · 11/05/2026 22:25

He dug this deep hole for himself by favouring his dodgy friends, aka Mandelson.

Yep, that was a dick move. He needs more trustworthy advisors for sure.

OP posts:
JustGiveMeReason · 11/05/2026 23:34

lonelyplanetmum · 11/05/2026 20:39

Yes I agree. There have been some mistakes but some steady good Labour policies that mainly go unnoticed, e.g. reductions in NHS waiting lists showing already, more hospital appointments, increased minimum wage, better workers’ rights including maternity protections, bereavement leave, banning zero-hours contracts; improved renters’ rights including pet ownership, new publicly owned clean energy company, renewable energy investment, increased school funding, improved EU trade cooperation. Also implementing some long term industrial strategy for economic growth.
But the good goes unnoticed.
It’s bizarre- with Labour everyone turns a blind eye to the good things.
Yet with Reform the blind eye is turned to all the (very) bad things. [ e.g. the many shabby self serving indications including fossil fuel promotion, edging towards a private health care model, spending 1000’s ignoring domestic duties to try and see Trump, repeated dodgy donations, overt lies, scaremongering and diversions of expenses.]

This

JustGiveMeReason · 11/05/2026 23:39

mummaneedsarest · 11/05/2026 20:54

Agree with the post from @Slowdownyouredoingfineand the other rational posters on here. He’s a decent man who’s doing a steady job surrounded by despots. Obviously the Brexiters won’t support him, but if you’re generally centrist or left of centre then we need to club together to stop the rw press and social media companies getting Reform in meaning all scrutiny and checks and balances go out the window and the rich just continue to get richer. You think Farage / Trump and the rest care about poor people getting wealthier or healthier? Think again.

Yes, Labour have actually begun to make some positive changes - which ALMOST NEVER get reported, eg:

the renters rights bill,
NHS waiting lists down
free school breakfast clubs
free childcare rollout
workers rights reform
500,000 more kids receiving free school meals
highest defence spending since Cold War
railways under public ownership
youth EU travel scheme

Plus closer ties to Europe and economy was slowly progressing until Trumps war.

This is not Amazon Prime life, it’s real life and real politics and progress takes time and a bit of patience. We have 5 year terms for a reason -to allow a realistic timeframe to get things done. I run a business and I’ve moved into other organisations to head departments - whenever I have a development plan I know it will take me a few years to implement and not overnight. We all need to get real.

and this.

In this "instant" age where people have got used to having answers at their fingertips, some seem to think it's like a magician or Genie in a bottle where things instantly can change when someone snaps their fingers. Of course real life isn't like that.

Unfortunately you get that oik Chris Mason given 50% of the news programme every night to make up his little fantasies, and when things get repeated often enough, people begin to presume they must be true. He chooses to continually look for issues with a man getting on with his job - which of course has been made FAR more complicated and challenging by Trump having been elected in USA - rather than presenting a fair, unbiased reflection of what is going on in Parliament. I just sit a squirm at so much of his questioning each night.

Blahblahblahabla · 11/05/2026 23:47

Are we actually being serious that 80 snakes can seriously overturn the democratic vote of 60 million people. Because I have had enough of this. I am starting to think this is actually what’s wrong with our country. We cannot chop and change PM like this!

nam3c4ang3 · 11/05/2026 23:48

SevenYellowHammers · 11/05/2026 22:42

Could you post your evidence for these claims please?

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26335569

DrBlackbird · 12/05/2026 00:03

Sidebeforeself · 11/05/2026 22:41

The same is true of The Guardian and any Tory leader

But oddly, neither does The Graun ever approve of a Labour leader. Unless maybe if Corbyn was elected. Unfortunately its integrity was lost years ago.

DrBlackbird · 12/05/2026 00:07

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is among cabinet ministers calling for Starmer to set out a timetable for his resignation

Thats disappointing because i thought she had some capabilities, but now she’s just being another egotistical PM wannabe going by what serves her career rather than what’s best for the country.

Cheeseandcrumpetsyumyum · 12/05/2026 01:20

Blahblahblahabla · 11/05/2026 23:47

Are we actually being serious that 80 snakes can seriously overturn the democratic vote of 60 million people. Because I have had enough of this. I am starting to think this is actually what’s wrong with our country. We cannot chop and change PM like this!

For information, 60 million people did not vote for the Labour Party with Sir Keir Starmer as leader.

The Labour Party won with 33.7% of the total votes cast. Also remember that many of those eligible to vote did not do so.

So the country did not overwhelmingly support Starmer's Labour Party. Quite a lot of those votes were in protest at the Tories' record.

Starmer may not do so badly on the International stage but if he can't control his backbenchers and make the much needed welfare reform changes and bowed to them and ditched the 2 child UC benefit cap when it was very popular with the voting public who wished to keep it, why should he keep his position?

Then on top of that he appoints untrustworthy people like Mandelson, whilst ignoring all the warnings given to him. And then blames and fires others for his poor decisions.

Such inept behaviour from a former human rights lawyer! But then again he has forgotten his past career and now overlooks human rights and international law abuses and let's them go unchallenged when it suits him.

This is why he should be considering his position.

He has no backbone. The public sees that and his own backbenchers sees that.

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone.

However, the Labour Party backbenchers seem to be very keen on self destructing if they think the public will vote for a more left leaning Party fronted by the likes of Ed Miliband or Angela Rayner! Even Andy Burnham will not change their fortunes if he won't take serious steps to reform welfare and align the numbers eligible to receive it with the European average, which is way, way lower than the in the UK.

echt · 12/05/2026 01:25

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone

So that's his problem. FFS.

Thefastandthecurious5 · 12/05/2026 01:26

DrBlackbird · 12/05/2026 00:07

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is among cabinet ministers calling for Starmer to set out a timetable for his resignation

Thats disappointing because i thought she had some capabilities, but now she’s just being another egotistical PM wannabe going by what serves her career rather than what’s best for the country.

She’s a twat.

Thefastandthecurious5 · 12/05/2026 01:29

Whatafustercluck · 11/05/2026 23:16

I've said this all along. KS has a PR problem. Blair also had Alistair Campbell.

And to people talking about Ed Milliband as a good possible successor: all The Sun had to do was print a front page picture of the man eating a bacon roll on election day to put people off voting Labour.

Whoever replaces KS is already on borrowed time.

Completely agree. I really like Ed Miliband and think he’d be a good successor, but the media will rip him to shreds. They mainly resent his left-of-centre beliefs, slight social awkwardness and Jewish heritage, saying stuff like he’s ’un-British’, ‘a citizen of nowhere’ etc. Awfully cruel common or garden antisemitism.

Thefastandthecurious5 · 12/05/2026 01:30

Cheeseandcrumpetsyumyum · 12/05/2026 01:20

For information, 60 million people did not vote for the Labour Party with Sir Keir Starmer as leader.

The Labour Party won with 33.7% of the total votes cast. Also remember that many of those eligible to vote did not do so.

So the country did not overwhelmingly support Starmer's Labour Party. Quite a lot of those votes were in protest at the Tories' record.

Starmer may not do so badly on the International stage but if he can't control his backbenchers and make the much needed welfare reform changes and bowed to them and ditched the 2 child UC benefit cap when it was very popular with the voting public who wished to keep it, why should he keep his position?

Then on top of that he appoints untrustworthy people like Mandelson, whilst ignoring all the warnings given to him. And then blames and fires others for his poor decisions.

Such inept behaviour from a former human rights lawyer! But then again he has forgotten his past career and now overlooks human rights and international law abuses and let's them go unchallenged when it suits him.

This is why he should be considering his position.

He has no backbone. The public sees that and his own backbenchers sees that.

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone.

However, the Labour Party backbenchers seem to be very keen on self destructing if they think the public will vote for a more left leaning Party fronted by the likes of Ed Miliband or Angela Rayner! Even Andy Burnham will not change their fortunes if he won't take serious steps to reform welfare and align the numbers eligible to receive it with the European average, which is way, way lower than the in the UK.

The Labour Party won with 33.7% of the total votes cast. Also remember that many of those eligible to vote did not do so.

Do you remember the alternative vote referendum in 2011/12? Did you vote in it? It’s because of that referendum that we still have first past the post.

asdbaybeeee · 12/05/2026 05:56

MissAmbrosia · 11/05/2026 20:36

I like him and have done since his impassioned anti-Brexit speeches back in the day. I am slightly disappointed he's not quite so impassioned these days but fear he is stymied by the media who all seem to hate him for no real reason. I think the Labour party ARE getting on with stuff but all anyone hears is about welfare scroungers and small boats. It will take a LONG time to get over the Tory years but instead of supporting the necessary, all the media focus is on fecking Reform and Farage who have no policies or plans at all. I like it that the Labour party is not blaming immigrants for all the woes of society and actually trying to do something. I think even they realise they need to work faster. They certainly need some better PR.

I agree with this.

i do wonder if he needs to step down for the sake of the party. Otherwise in two years labour will be out.

PolitePombear · 12/05/2026 05:57

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

MikeRafone · 12/05/2026 06:10

hobbledyhoy · 11/05/2026 20:15

It’s the usual. The right wing parties can do whatever they like and get little scrutiny, Labour or left leaning have their backgrounds scoured to find a mole to make a headline mountain. Case in point, Farage’s multiple donations totalling over £5million from Christopher Harborne and £200k from JCB, also accepting donations in crypto that are untraceable - very little reaction. Starmer and wife getting football tickets and some clothes - utter fucking outrage.
It’s the fact that the media peddles this shite and people believe it without thinking critically about why it’s being fed to them this way that convinces me we’ll continually vote against our own interests.

This

PropertyD · 12/05/2026 06:13

Cheeseandcrumpetsyumyum · 12/05/2026 01:20

For information, 60 million people did not vote for the Labour Party with Sir Keir Starmer as leader.

The Labour Party won with 33.7% of the total votes cast. Also remember that many of those eligible to vote did not do so.

So the country did not overwhelmingly support Starmer's Labour Party. Quite a lot of those votes were in protest at the Tories' record.

Starmer may not do so badly on the International stage but if he can't control his backbenchers and make the much needed welfare reform changes and bowed to them and ditched the 2 child UC benefit cap when it was very popular with the voting public who wished to keep it, why should he keep his position?

Then on top of that he appoints untrustworthy people like Mandelson, whilst ignoring all the warnings given to him. And then blames and fires others for his poor decisions.

Such inept behaviour from a former human rights lawyer! But then again he has forgotten his past career and now overlooks human rights and international law abuses and let's them go unchallenged when it suits him.

This is why he should be considering his position.

He has no backbone. The public sees that and his own backbenchers sees that.

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone.

However, the Labour Party backbenchers seem to be very keen on self destructing if they think the public will vote for a more left leaning Party fronted by the likes of Ed Miliband or Angela Rayner! Even Andy Burnham will not change their fortunes if he won't take serious steps to reform welfare and align the numbers eligible to receive it with the European average, which is way, way lower than the in the UK.

This!

Sherbs12 · 12/05/2026 06:25

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

What is ‘blatant’ exactly? That there are people who think and feel differently to you? To be honest, it’s unusual and refreshing to see support for Starmer - there are many threads and posts that are exactly the opposite.

Sherbs12 · 12/05/2026 06:28

echt · 12/05/2026 01:25

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone

So that's his problem. FFS.

This! We had a ‘personality’ with Johnson and look how that turned out. Politics is broken. People want someone with ‘charisma’ and slogans. I despair - we’re on a fast-track to Trumpism with the cult of personality and unserious politics of Farage.

TulipsAndPancakes · 12/05/2026 06:46

Totally agree, OP.
He reminds me of my boring but very sensible uncle and I trust him.

Sunshinemoonlightboogie · 12/05/2026 06:50

Had exactly the same conversation yesterday! This constant blame game is so tedious. I am losing all faith in labour, stopped being a card carrying member a while back, and now not even sure I’d vote for them with this witch hunt!

SevenYellowHammers · 12/05/2026 06:52

cantgardenintherain · 11/05/2026 22:26

I quite like him because he is intelligent. We need that.

Intelligence doesn’t get voted for. People like Trump and Farage because they talk in simple soundbites

OP posts:
rwalker · 12/05/2026 06:54

It’s like saying you’d sooner be punched than stabbed

SevenYellowHammers · 12/05/2026 06:56

echt · 12/05/2026 01:25

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone

So that's his problem. FFS.

Is that what it is then? In the reality show that is politics, he’s not charismatic enough?

OP posts:
Sherbs12 · 12/05/2026 06:56

Whatafustercluck · 11/05/2026 23:16

I've said this all along. KS has a PR problem. Blair also had Alistair Campbell.

And to people talking about Ed Milliband as a good possible successor: all The Sun had to do was print a front page picture of the man eating a bacon roll on election day to put people off voting Labour.

Whoever replaces KS is already on borrowed time.

Totally agree - Starmer needs a Campbell (or maybe even a Malcolm Tucker!).

Both Campbell and Paul Mason wrote great articles in The New World yesterday, about why this isn’t the right time for Starmer to go - well worth a read.