Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to wonder if a stay-at-home mum could become an MP?

580 replies

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 08:33

Do you think a degree educated, middle class 30 year old SAHM without any notable work history would ever have a chance at becoming a local councillor or MP? I feel like most MPs have either a local council or highly skilled professional background (law, finance etc). I’ve googled and I can’t find a single MP who has a SAHM background.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Passaggressfedup · 08/05/2026 09:47

I would just like a voice to campaign for a return to traditional family values. I believe the decline in family values has resulted in many of the problems we have in society these days
You mean the traditional times when women were dependent on men and stayed with abusive husbands because they gave no means nor self esteem to leave them?

Imagine your husband not earning his fortune. A life on benefits, then minimum wage jobs until you are 67 because that's the only way to just survive

Oh the clueless life of the naive privileged! How about you do something to help struggling single working mums instead?

TheFairyCaravan · 08/05/2026 09:48

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 09:29

I have family members who literally pretended to have anxiety and ADHD and receive PIP for this. Lots of their friends have also done the same. I know it wasn’t quite that simple (they had to fill out forms), but they admit that it is completely made up. Their partner also claims carers allowance.

Absolute bullshit.

Mischance · 08/05/2026 09:49

TheignT · 08/05/2026 09:22

It looked pretty privileged to me.

In what way!!??

Have you actually read the book?

8TinyToeBeans · 08/05/2026 09:51

It would depend on the local demographic. Personally, no I wouldn't vote for you. I want women in power in the workplace, not staying at home to raise a family. But that's personal preference. If there are enough people who support your viewpoint, then maybe you'd be successful.

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 09:51

TheFairyCaravan · 08/05/2026 09:48

Absolute bullshit.

It’s not bullshit. She even told me what I could do to do the same…

OP posts:
Brightonkebab · 08/05/2026 09:53

Oncemorewithsome · 08/05/2026 08:37

To be fair a SAHM probably has lots of experience and connection to what is needed in the local community. Depending on their politics I would vote for them.

That’s what a councillor is for, not an mp

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 09:54

Passaggressfedup · 08/05/2026 09:47

I would just like a voice to campaign for a return to traditional family values. I believe the decline in family values has resulted in many of the problems we have in society these days
You mean the traditional times when women were dependent on men and stayed with abusive husbands because they gave no means nor self esteem to leave them?

Imagine your husband not earning his fortune. A life on benefits, then minimum wage jobs until you are 67 because that's the only way to just survive

Oh the clueless life of the naive privileged! How about you do something to help struggling single working mums instead?

I don’t think it should be something people are forced to do, obviously. But I know multiple people who would love to be a SAHM but can’t currently afford to be. The government provides free nursery hours and breakfast clubs so that parents go out to work - why not provide more funding so that children can have their parent stay at home and look after them instead?

OP posts:
viques · 08/05/2026 09:55

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 09:16

I’d want to reduce the overall welfare spend - things like PIP, carers allowance are given out too freely at the moment. I’d also want to re-instate the child benefit cap for families where neither parent works. I’d also like to make it more difficult to gain citizenship/ILR so there would be less eligible for welfare.

I wouldn’t vote for a one trick pony manifesto like that. You are supposed to represent all the constituents, not set them up against each other.

Fizbosshoes · 08/05/2026 09:55

I know someone who is married to a former MP. He started as a councillor and then stood as an MP. The workload was immense, there were months in the year they barely saw him...it seems like quite a big leap from a SAHM

PrettyPickle · 08/05/2026 09:56

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 08:33

Do you think a degree educated, middle class 30 year old SAHM without any notable work history would ever have a chance at becoming a local councillor or MP? I feel like most MPs have either a local council or highly skilled professional background (law, finance etc). I’ve googled and I can’t find a single MP who has a SAHM background.

Absolutely, just because there isn't a SAHM as a Councillor doesn't mean there shouldn't be, every section of society should have a right to be represented, you have valuable experience to bring to the table..

The only issue is that as a SAHM, who will look after your kids when at meetings and surgeries etc? If you can cover that, go for it.

MintTwirl · 08/05/2026 09:57

OP is there a reason you aren’t answering what you are currently doing within your local community? With your focus being on families there is quite a lot you could be doing locally to help support families on your area.
For example in our community we have a young woman who set up a food bank, runs a school holiday activity camp for local children using money from sponsors, helps people who live in substandard homes to get issues sorted, campaigned against the closure of local facilities used by families, after all her hard work she was elected as a councillor.

DuskOPorter · 08/05/2026 09:58

It really isn’t about what you have done before it is what platform you’d run on and what you’d bring to the role.

You’d have to sell what type of change that would bring your voters.

I don’t see why a SAHM couldn’t be a politician but are you not worried it might clash with your already demonstrated lived values.

The amount of hours politics takes from family life and that does seem to be one of the aspects of life you value.

JSMill · 08/05/2026 09:58

Thinking about it, I have a family friend who has been involved with the Labour party for years. She currently works for a Labour minister. She aspired to be an MP for a long time but ended up turning down an offer to stand because she would never see her children.

WhatNextImScared · 08/05/2026 09:59

Angela Rayner did it. Look at the abuse she got and still gets on the daily. The most vile, misogynist comments were made about her on a Telegraph podcast only last week.

SoSoSoSickofthis · 08/05/2026 09:59

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 09:01

The things that I’d love to work on would be tax cuts for families with a stay at home parent as I believe there’s massive societal benefits to having a parent at home. I’d like to make it possible for more families to have this option rather than women feeling forced back to work as soon as their maternity leave ends.

You lost my vote at ‘women’.

If you’d said ‘parents’ you’d have interested me. How about supporting both parents to go part time? Why ‘women’?

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 08/05/2026 10:00

There is nothing to stop a SAHM from becoming an MP. And if you're thinking of becoming a Reform MP, the bar seems to be extremely low, so I don't imagine that the lack of experience would be a barrier to your selection.

Whether or not you would be a fit person to contribute to the government of our country is an entirely different question.

dottiedodah · 08/05/2026 10:00

I think it would be a massive change TBH .To go from a SAHP to being an MP would be huge! I often think that MPs are slated a lot but have quite a hard job. By all means go for it but be aware of what you are getting into first

SoSoSoSickofthis · 08/05/2026 10:00

SAHP!!!! Not SAHM!

FurryWastebin · 08/05/2026 10:01

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 08:42

Yes. But I don’t feel like I’d appeal to voters. Where I live, everybody involved in local councils is probably close to retirement age or past it and the local mp candidates are all men aged 45+.
Ultimately I have no real career experience and I’m also not an Angela Rayner / Jess Phillips ‘struggled through being a single mum at a young age’ type either.

What would you have to offer? What would your "unique selling point" be that would appeal to voters?

If you're interested in politics get involved with your local party?

Strandas · 08/05/2026 10:02

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 09:24

I think the benefit on society would be huge. Less children and adults with mental health issues, less stress in the household, stronger family values, children raised on a better diet due to more time available etc.

You’re cutting carer’s allowance, but what you are proposing is a carer’s allowance in a different form.

I have not seen any evidence having a parent at home all day is associated with any of the things you’ve listed. If you’re basing it on your experience, then from my experience it absolutely not true!

I think it would be a huge backwards step for women.

ItTook9Years · 08/05/2026 10:03

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 08:43

I worked for 5 years in publishing before having DC. I have a high earning DH and chose to be a SAHM after that.

This would be a massive turn off to me, and not very relatable to the majority of people you’d be seeking to represent.

Have you any idea of the demands of being an MP? Unless you already live in zones 1-2 in London you’d be away from your children 4-5 nights a week on average.

Poppingby · 08/05/2026 10:03

I would vote for a previous SAHM if she had done community work etc, voluntarily or otherwise. But I wouldn't vote for a Reform candidate with any background as I would just think you were racist and contributing to the degradation of my country. Also a bit dim. HTH.

Bjorkdidit · 08/05/2026 10:03

Questionsssss · 08/05/2026 09:54

I don’t think it should be something people are forced to do, obviously. But I know multiple people who would love to be a SAHM but can’t currently afford to be. The government provides free nursery hours and breakfast clubs so that parents go out to work - why not provide more funding so that children can have their parent stay at home and look after them instead?

How does the 'funding so that children can have their parent stay at home' differ from the welfare that you're planning to cut to pay for it?

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 08/05/2026 10:04

Gosh, so self centred. “More money for my privileged family, paid for by cutting benefits to the disabled and terminally ill.” You won’t mind picking your way over the homeless masses on your way to Waitrose?

Strandas · 08/05/2026 10:05

SoSoSoSickofthis · 08/05/2026 09:59

You lost my vote at ‘women’.

If you’d said ‘parents’ you’d have interested me. How about supporting both parents to go part time? Why ‘women’?

Edited

Yes! Surely this would be of huge benefit to the family life the OP is trying to encourage. It would only work if parents get a tax break if both (not just one or the other) work part time.