Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel slightly sad for Labour and Keir?

226 replies

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/05/2026 03:14

Aibu to feel sad for Labour's results so far ? I've not historically been a Labour voter but I think Keir has done a good job on some things but on others he was never going to be popular...and no one would be ! I like that he's the first leader recently to appear to have a moral backbone and consistency (if he truly wasn't informed about Mandelson I might add).
How do you feel about the state of play particularly if you've been lifelong labour and did you swing to a different vote this time round ?

OP posts:
Seymour5 · 08/05/2026 06:59

eyeballer · 08/05/2026 05:09

@Hallowedturf . Are you honestly saying if they got in and scrapped the triple lock there would have been no fall out? Look at the ridiculous outcry over means testing winter fuel!

Much of that outcry came from pensioners who are a few quid over Pension Credit levels. Unless people have substantial extra pensions, or savings, they might as well just spend up before retirement. I actually think the cut off once they did means test should have been lower.

Apacketofbiscuitsaday · 08/05/2026 07:00

I agree. I don't like all the building on green belt though.

ilovebrie8 · 08/05/2026 07:00

eyeballer · 08/05/2026 05:48

No one is happy to pay ever escalating amounts of council tax to fund what is predominately SEND commitments, social care for the elderly and to fund council pensions. A new solution needs to be found for all three of these issues

Well pensions have changed, they are far less generous now va current recipients Plus the LGPs is the only funded scheme in the public sector I believe.

We have an ageing population which is expensive but every government has ignored the issue. It also impacts the NHS.

Transport for SEN is a big cot? there must be a more efficient way of doing is as opposed to paying black cabs etc

Council tax is through the roof and eye watering where I am.

People have had it, the amount spent on care homes is madness these places make huge huge profits …a different way needs to be found.

The SEND costs are astronomical that needs a revamp. It’s a money pit!

DeposedPresident · 08/05/2026 07:00

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 08/05/2026 06:49

He’s not got moral backbone. He’s the same as the rest of them. He spoke well before the election and then proceeded to do fuck all.

And given the public knew about various Mandelson scandals years ago, he seemed an odd choice even without the Epstein stuff.

Exactly. He has no excuse that he didn't know that PM was dodgy, EVERYONE knew. When Mandelson was appointed you could practically hear a collective nationwide 'WTF?'. I said at the time 'Well that's going to end up biting him on the arse'.

ChelseaBagger · 08/05/2026 07:01

I'm traditionally a labour/lib dem swing voter. I agree that Kier Starmer appears to be one of a few small number for politicians who value some element of morality and fairness.

Unfortunately, it turns out he's surprisingly bad at the actual nuts and bolts of running a government!

AllJoyAndNoFun · 08/05/2026 07:02

Lemonthyme · 08/05/2026 06:46

Agree. Social care is a can which again keeps being kicked down the road.

Older people don't want to hear that they've not been paying tax into a piggy bank that is drawn down when they retire. But the reality is and always has been that it's working age people who pay for those retired. For their pensions, for their care, for the NHS they use more of. All of these cost vast amounts of money.

Councils are going bankrupt due to adult social care. The country's budget is struggling in part due to interest costs on debt but also the NHS is the largest part of the budget. The largest benefit recipients are the elderly.

I'm not saying that any of that is changeable. We still have a low state pension vs. other countries. We still have the best value for money health care system of any developed nation. So it's pie in the sky to make any of that cheaper.

What might be possible is you look at care home providers and they are making vast profits. Not the workers that's for sure but the owners. The longer we keep people out of those money pits the better. And that might be a combination of community led public support but also more support from relatives in a way companies are incentivised to help with. Has true flexible working ever really been a success? Not really. But then that could add cost to businesses (but on the counter argument that could also retain staff. I mean how many of us on MN are in the position of caring for both kids and elderly parents and getting low support? I'm sure many of us have had to cut hours or even leave jobs as a result.)

It's complex. People don't want to listen to complex. They don't want to hear "we are poorer than we were before 2008 and we've not admitted that for nearly 20 years and there's f-all we can do about it".

People want someone else to blame.

And if they want that? Blame the US. Blame the mega corporations who are making vast profits and offshoring them. If you want someone to pay more in our economy, they definitely have the pockets and the reason to be taxed more. But they're also really good at finding ways to avoid that tax...

You know, there's an Irish joke about a guy asking for directions and the person he asks scratches his chin then says:

"Well I wouldn't start from here..."

You know what, we need to be more bloody honest about where we are and stop looking for scapegoats. When we're honest, we can fix it.

I mainly agree with you other than I'm not sure we can actually fix it because the structural issues run too deep and too internationally - for example "tax big corporates" would require an international agreement on corporate taxation which will never happen because every country is making cut price deals to get jobs into their country.

Honestly I think we are going the way of having to take on more caring/ financial support responsibilities within family and immediate support structures (so it's a good job we haven't spent the last 5 decades dismantling those..... oh wait....). I just don't see a future whereby the state (i.e. the taxpayer) can continue to support all this third party social care. However, nor can families afford to have family members not working to do this care so its catch 22.

Then there's AI.... because while I'm not anti-immigration (although I think there are huge flaws in the existing system) I don't necessarily agree that we are going to need a lot more workers- in fact quite the opposite.

eyeballer · 08/05/2026 07:02

@ilovebrie8 but people don’t want to or can’t afford to fund their own care

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 08/05/2026 07:04

If only the laughing emoji still existed.

LlynTegid · 08/05/2026 07:04

There will be good Labour councillors who have worked to improve their local area who have lost their seats, and I feel sorry for them. Just as I will for any Lib Dems or Greens who have lost seats and done good work in their area.

If only we had a PR system such as in the Irish Republic, where you have several representatives and can choose a personal vote for someone who may be the only one from that party whose work you respect.

StartingFreshFor2026 · 08/05/2026 07:05

One of the upsetting things about this Labour government is how they try to spin things. With the proposed SEND reforms they didn't just come right out and say "we need to save money, these are the cuts we're proposing", they tried to make it look like they were doing us a favour.

There were weeks and weeks of little articles in the media about how much SEND taxis cost then the proposals came out saying "we just really - morally - think every child should go to their nearest school." Absolutely no understanding of the way that communities form/exist and that for so many children, the cheapest nearest mainstream school isn't suitable and there are so few special schools.

Then they had the audacity to say that they were actually giving children with SEND "more rights", while proposing sweeping away so many of the tribunal powers and heavily restricting other rights.

It is all a lie. At least if they came out and just said it was all to save money, then people could respect they were telling the truth and make their choices / respond to the consultation accordingly. It was really eye opening watching all the conservative and Lib Dem MPs stand up in House of Commons on April 13th to defend disabled children's rights . Difficult to watch as a die-hard lefty but then the Labour Party aren't really left wing anymore, and I don't think we can say that the Conservatives are the "nasty party". Labour are certainly the lying, gaslighting party.

YoulookniceJacky · 08/05/2026 07:05

Labour used to be the party of the working class but now it’s the party for the non- working. Ordinary working people are taxed to the hilt to fund more PIP etc and an increasingly desperate NHS.
They dismiss legitimate concerns about migrants coming in on boats. Let’s be honest a huge number of people voting for Reform are voting because of immigration. Until Labour are even willing to discuss it they haven’t got a chance in hell if staying in power. They have also lost the Muslim vote to independents or the Greens.

eyeballer · 08/05/2026 07:06

You know what, we need to be more bloody honest about where we are and stop looking for scapegoats. When we're honest, we can fix it.

My worry is it will be late or the damage is to deep.

Duvetdayneeded · 08/05/2026 07:06

Let me think if I feel sorry for Labour… no

Pedallleur · 08/05/2026 07:08

Unfortunately they are the Govt of the day, they inherited the Tory legacy and found they had to deal with a global situation and eg Mandelson but that's politics. The Opposition may well be thinking they are going to inherit this. They should be working together to limit the damage and decide that it's country first not Party.

EasternStandard · 08/05/2026 07:08

ChelseaBagger · 08/05/2026 07:01

I'm traditionally a labour/lib dem swing voter. I agree that Kier Starmer appears to be one of a few small number for politicians who value some element of morality and fairness.

Unfortunately, it turns out he's surprisingly bad at the actual nuts and bolts of running a government!

No way, not with that sacking anyone else record.

eyeballer · 08/05/2026 07:09

I mainly agree with you other than I'm not sure we can actually fix it because the structural issues run too deep and too internationally - for example "tax big corporates" would require an international agreement on corporate taxation which will never happen because every country is making cut price deals to get jobs into their country.

Yep, I think a big problem is how we have ignored our young people and much of the West are facing similar demographic problems so more young skilled people will go abroad exacerbating our problems.

gannett · 08/05/2026 07:09

ChelseaBagger · 08/05/2026 07:01

I'm traditionally a labour/lib dem swing voter. I agree that Kier Starmer appears to be one of a few small number for politicians who value some element of morality and fairness.

Unfortunately, it turns out he's surprisingly bad at the actual nuts and bolts of running a government!

What is the element of morality and fairness that Starmer values?! He barely seems to have any political beliefs let alone principles.

Savvysix1984 · 08/05/2026 07:11

I care about global issues because they do impact us. Couldn’t vote labour due to Starmers weak stance on Gaza, Trump and the escalating situation in the Middle East.

MsGreying · 08/05/2026 07:13

Don't weep for the man whose pension needs it's own act if parliament.

And just remember they are blind to basic biology.

whiteroseredrose · 08/05/2026 07:13

I agree. I feel sorry for Kier because he was stabbed in the back by his backbenchers from day 1. Who needs enemies with friends like these?

If he had been able to implement some changes without having the choice of back down or be voted down we may not be in this mess.

So the government was in chaos from day 1.

Unfortunately most of the backbenchers are inexperienced with government and probably still hark back to student politics with lots of ideals and no hard practicality.

So thanks to them we now have a surge in Reform. Cheers.

OneTealShaker · 08/05/2026 07:15

Moral stance? Backbone?

Where?

Hallowedturf · 08/05/2026 07:17

whiteroseredrose · 08/05/2026 07:13

I agree. I feel sorry for Kier because he was stabbed in the back by his backbenchers from day 1. Who needs enemies with friends like these?

If he had been able to implement some changes without having the choice of back down or be voted down we may not be in this mess.

So the government was in chaos from day 1.

Unfortunately most of the backbenchers are inexperienced with government and probably still hark back to student politics with lots of ideals and no hard practicality.

So thanks to them we now have a surge in Reform. Cheers.

He knew.

Boomer55 · 08/05/2026 07:17

Council elections are protest time, to give parties a kick. Labour have failed in so many ways, these results were inevitable.

OneTealShaker · 08/05/2026 07:18

whiteroseredrose · 08/05/2026 07:13

I agree. I feel sorry for Kier because he was stabbed in the back by his backbenchers from day 1. Who needs enemies with friends like these?

If he had been able to implement some changes without having the choice of back down or be voted down we may not be in this mess.

So the government was in chaos from day 1.

Unfortunately most of the backbenchers are inexperienced with government and probably still hark back to student politics with lots of ideals and no hard practicality.

So thanks to them we now have a surge in Reform. Cheers.

He was the one who stuffed the parliamentary Labour Party full of economically illiterate people who have never run anything. Most are political activists of charity workers. Hardly the enterprising types with successful track records in business and the private sector. What would the understand about the economy or growth.

Starmer himself understands 0 about the economy and is basically an ex ambulance chasing human rights lawyer who failed upwards. He appointed a fraud as his chancellor who lied about her credentials.

And this is the result l.

Drivingmissrangey · 08/05/2026 07:19

I like that he's the first leader recently to appear to have a moral backbone and consistency

Have you been living under a rock OP?