Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Council Elections

1001 replies

OneTealShaker · 08/05/2026 00:35

The first declared seats going to Reform.

Reform +2
Labour -1

Buckle up people.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
Happyjoe · 08/05/2026 10:08

Reliablesource · 08/05/2026 10:02

And still not being remotely tackled now that Labour are in power? Tories and Labour have both been piss-poor in tackling immigration and now they are reaping the results of people’s frustrations.

Have they not?

So far the numbers of immigration halved.
Increased skill workers salary for visa rules.
Ended families being able to come with those working or students.
Have to work for 10 years before can apply for permanent residency.
People have to speak better English here now.
Reduced the time graduates have to find a job
They have made a real effort to get through the huge backlog of asylum claims and are doing so.
Increased the removal of failed asylum seekers and offenders.
Increased staff to deal with asylum claims.
Changes being made to Refugee Family Reunion for successful asylum seekers.
Set up a new force.

ClaudiaWankleman · 08/05/2026 10:10

I had 3 votes yesterday, and gave them all to the Greens. DP chose LD. We were both unable to bring ourselves to vote Labour as we felt like they needed some punishment for what's been happening nationally.

My council hasn't declared yet, but its been Labour led for 20+ years. I'm expecting Labour to remain the biggest party with a number of Green, LD, Cons and Reform candidates. I would be surprised if the Cons and Reform candidates outnumbered the Labour.

Elsewhere my parents voted (and in their ward won) Green but the overall council is no control with Labour as the biggest party, and Reform and Cons together outnumbering the rest of the parties together. Very confusing, probably very unstable!

Passingthrough123 · 08/05/2026 10:10

Senescence · 08/05/2026 09:26

Yes, because so many people are really, really stupid.

It's attitudes like yours that are going to sweep Reform into power in two years. Calling people stupid for how they've voted now will only make them double down at the GE.

ThatNattyPlayer · 08/05/2026 10:11

Senescence · 08/05/2026 10:06

Why do people keep writing this kind of inane nonsense and arguing against invented things that literally nobody has said and they have made up?

Who told you that you couldn’t vote for whoever you want?

I certainly didn’t so why are you directing this silly comment at me?

Why are you being so aggressive, it’s a forum for opinions, I stated mine and was told I “live under a rock” which is not necessary

caringcarer · 08/05/2026 10:11

Senescence · 08/05/2026 05:06

This is a hugely disingenuous comment. Council tax bills vary enormously around the country because they are to fund local services and split between those who live there.

If you want to assess the performance of Reform councils you need to look at two things:

  1. how much they have increased/ cut the council tax bill in each area compared to the average increase across the country (bearing in mind that their pledge - when the existing Reform-run councils were elected and also for the local elections yesterday - was to cut the Council tax bills. Have they done so where they have gained power previously?

(Clue - the answer is no. The council tax bills have increased substantially, and far more than the national average increase. Therefore, what rational person would give any credence to them making similar promises elsewhere?).

  1. Have local services improved or got worse? In the areas where Reform councils have been elected to date, they were elected on a promise of substantially increasing and improving Council services within a short space of time.

(Clue: In every single area in which they have been elected, pretty much every measure of quality and satisfaction with council services has decreased. They have failed to deliver on pretty much every measure that they told the electorate in these areas that they would deliver, and actually made things substantially worse than they were before).

Facts matter. And any sane person checks such facts before casting their vote. If they don’t do so and they vote based on soundbites and undeliverable promises with no credible plan about how to deliver them, and are taken in by the lies of a charlatan multiple times despite these having been exposed over and over again, then they have only themselves to blame when they get precisely what they voted for: charlatans who will do the precise opposite of what they promised to do.

Edited

Where is you evidence? Worcestershire is higher but other Reform held areas are having less increases than they previously did. It was on TV last night. Averages include the higher Worcestershire CT.

FernandoSor · 08/05/2026 10:12

Swiftie1878 · 08/05/2026 09:57

You are SO lucky, and if that were my position I would absolutely be voting for the person, and not the party.
Here, they were all new candidates as our current councillor stood down awaiting us being turned into a Unitary Authority. Even the candidates from other parties (from the incumbent) were new.

Yes, we were voting for a 'shadow authority' for a new unitary authority who will operate alongside the existing county and borough councils for a year. I know our existing borough councillors of course, but the new unitary ward is huge - I vaguely knew one of the LD candidates so voted for her, and the other LD candidate works in a local school so seemed like a safe bet. I actually know both of the Green candidates and they had very sensible messaging (no reference at all to the national party silliness, just traditional green stuff about clean water and ecological diversity) but ended up going LD as I have in the past.

Senescence · 08/05/2026 10:13

Reliablesource · 08/05/2026 09:53

i have give a rational reason as to why Reform appeals to many voters. You think you know better. Clearly one of the arrogant Labour voters I was referring to.

Not interested in your ‘data’. We all know there has been an explosion in working age people claiming benefits due to ‘anxiety’ etc. Sickness benefits should be for those with a really serious illness or disability that prevents them from working, not for the workshy who feel a bit ‘anxious’ at the thought of it.

You didn’t provide any rational reason at all. Your “reason” contradicted data and evidenced facts so is imaginary and not a reason at all but a prejudice.

The fact you openly state you are “not interested in data” (i.e. facts) says it all.

No, I did not vote for Labour. Pathetic. I have made it perfectly clear that I’m not party political. You’re clearly incapable of making a rational argument to support your position so start with these tiresome attempts to try to project viewpoints you dislike onto others rather than putting forward any coherent position to support your own assertions.

Piknik · 08/05/2026 10:15

The sheer amount of people who feel betrayed and politically homeless means that elections for the foreseeable are just going to be massive protest votes. I have never heard the rhetoric being so grounded in ‘getting rid of the old’ rather than real belief in the new.

Senescence · 08/05/2026 10:16

ThatNattyPlayer · 08/05/2026 10:11

Why are you being so aggressive, it’s a forum for opinions, I stated mine and was told I “live under a rock” which is not necessary

Hello Mr Gove.

Many of us are tired of being regaled with “opinions” from people and their expectation that we should treat their assertions as though they have equal merit to that data and facts which their “opinions” contradict.

ThatNattyPlayer · 08/05/2026 10:18

Senescence · 08/05/2026 10:16

Hello Mr Gove.

Many of us are tired of being regaled with “opinions” from people and their expectation that we should treat their assertions as though they have equal merit to that data and facts which their “opinions” contradict.

I’m tired of you. Have a nice Friday!

Happyjoe · 08/05/2026 10:18

Passingthrough123 · 08/05/2026 10:10

It's attitudes like yours that are going to sweep Reform into power in two years. Calling people stupid for how they've voted now will only make them double down at the GE.

This is a fallacy.

Yuasa · 08/05/2026 10:19

Passingthrough123 · 08/05/2026 10:10

It's attitudes like yours that are going to sweep Reform into power in two years. Calling people stupid for how they've voted now will only make them double down at the GE.

If someone bases their vote on someone else calling them stupid, then there really is no other word for them.

Not that I believe this is a phenomenon. People vote for what appeals to them - blaming others for your vote is pure defensiveness.

Senescence · 08/05/2026 10:19

Yuasa · 08/05/2026 10:07

Not interested in your ‘data’.

And nobody is supposed to be a meanie and question how reasonable or informed Reform voters are.

Exactly! This post really summed up what the problem is. It isn’t the immigrants! 😁

Passingthrough123 · 08/05/2026 10:20

Senescence · 08/05/2026 10:16

Hello Mr Gove.

Many of us are tired of being regaled with “opinions” from people and their expectation that we should treat their assertions as though they have equal merit to that data and facts which their “opinions” contradict.

You can still do that without being aggressive though.

FernandoSor · 08/05/2026 10:21

Reliablesource · 08/05/2026 10:02

And still not being remotely tackled now that Labour are in power? Tories and Labour have both been piss-poor in tackling immigration and now they are reaping the results of people’s frustrations.

But migration figures are down hugely from the high of 2023 (halved). Number of asylum hostels down from 400 to 185 with a pledge to close them all by 2027. Returns/deportations/entry refusals at an all time high. Massively tightened up requirements on spoken English and ILR requirements. Number of study visas hugely reduced.

It might not be enough for you, but it's wrong to say that Labour have done nothing.

EasternStandard · 08/05/2026 10:22

FernandoSor · 08/05/2026 10:21

But migration figures are down hugely from the high of 2023 (halved). Number of asylum hostels down from 400 to 185 with a pledge to close them all by 2027. Returns/deportations/entry refusals at an all time high. Massively tightened up requirements on spoken English and ILR requirements. Number of study visas hugely reduced.

It might not be enough for you, but it's wrong to say that Labour have done nothing.

Labour seem to miss barracks when quoting accommodation figures.

Passingthrough123 · 08/05/2026 10:23

Yuasa · 08/05/2026 10:19

If someone bases their vote on someone else calling them stupid, then there really is no other word for them.

Not that I believe this is a phenomenon. People vote for what appeals to them - blaming others for your vote is pure defensiveness.

Calling them stupid implies they don't know their own minds. Many Reform voters are highly intelligent professionals, not the knuckle-dragging working class that the Left-wing want to paint them as.

It suits you to think of them like that, and that's why Reform will win the next GE unless attitudes like yours change.

FernandoSor · 08/05/2026 10:23

EasternStandard · 08/05/2026 10:22

Labour seem to miss barracks when quoting accommodation figures.

Yes, they are replacing asylum hostels in towns with disused army camps in remote locations. I thought this is what people wanted?

Lunalara · 08/05/2026 10:24

People have a clear example of what we can end up with if we vote like the Americans did. There is no excuse to vote Reform. Not now, not in the General Election. Mainstream politics have failed us, I will not lie about that. But Reform isn’t the answer. I am appalled by the results so far.

EasternStandard · 08/05/2026 10:24

FernandoSor · 08/05/2026 10:23

Yes, they are replacing asylum hostels in towns with disused army camps in remote locations. I thought this is what people wanted?

It still costs so if you put how money has been saved you need to include it.

Flyingintotheunknown · 08/05/2026 10:24

EasternStandard · 08/05/2026 10:22

Labour seem to miss barracks when quoting accommodation figures.

And HMOs!

Alexandra2001 · 08/05/2026 10:25

Reliablesource · 08/05/2026 10:06

Keir Starmer, the great Socialist, has a net worth of between £7 million and £15 million. You’ll find that most senior politicians in both main parties have great wealth compared with most of the electorate. Are you just singling out Farage because it suits your narrative?

His net wealth is mainly due to him buying a field for his parents donkeys in 1996 (for a few £1000s) and is based on its value IF it had planning permission... all declared.

No one gave him £5m for reasons not yet known, Farage's claim is its for security is BS.
If it were all above board, he'd have declared it as we supposed to have done when he stood as an MP.

We only only know about this £5m because someone investigated his earnings, then we have him buying a house for cash... lying and saying his partner bought it....

Tice living abroad, to avoid tax, is very off, for someone who claims to want to build a better UK.....

all men of the people

pigletpinkie · 08/05/2026 10:25

In which Reform led council have they “doubled” council tax? Are you getting your information from tiktok?

I didn’t vote Reform, but calling people idiotic for doing so is childish. Why mock reform voters suggesting that they have only voted due to frustration with immigration as it isn’t really a council matter, whilst staying strangely silent on the Greens suggesting the vote is a referendum on Gaza? The Green candidates will be just as inexperienced as the Reform candidates in many cases. Brighton’s Green led council has been a roaring success….🤔

FurierTransform · 08/05/2026 10:26

I think a mass increase in Reform seats is exactly what this country needs.

What's more concerning IMO is the votes for Greens - i don't think people really understand what the green party is all about, & their radical ideology on things like prostitution, drugs and national defence, that will for sure make its way into policy as they gain power, no matter what anyone points to in any current 'moderate' manifesto.

Happyjoe · 08/05/2026 10:26

EasternStandard · 08/05/2026 10:22

Labour seem to miss barracks when quoting accommodation figures.

You are unreasonable to expect any party who took over the mess left behind by the tories to fix this problem over night. You don't want them accommodated anywhere? You just don't want them here at all.

This is the problem with people in the UK right now. They expect instant gratification/results. The solution to the problems regarding asylum seekers isn't easy, if it were that easy it would've been done years ago. And now with the likes of Trump's war there will be more and more people making this journey, making the problem bigger and continue.

But yeah, it's all Labours fault eh?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread