Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question Zack Polanski’s credibility and political suitability?

286 replies

Bertiebiscuit · 06/05/2026 09:07

Everything about "zack Polanski" is fake - he was born David Paulden. He was never a "spokesman" for the Red Cross. He scammed women with fake hypnotism, He is a actor with a completely invented persona, he's no politician, he's a snake oil salesman. How can anyone vote for him?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
NoisyViewer · 07/05/2026 05:29

I agree with you, but if I can say you should always question the credibility of those you may vote for to rule the country

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 05:37

All political leaders or potential political leaders get heavily scrutinised - it’s part of the job.

Wearenotborg · 07/05/2026 05:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Skinnysaluki · 07/05/2026 06:13

Not another thread about Zak Polanski! It’s really tiresome now.
(Not to mention totally disingenuous, specious and highly politically motivated, as anyone can tell from the weird and robotic titles given to the threads)
The smear campaign on here and in the press has gone mad this week- desperate measures to try and head off the green surge before the council elections.
Let’s see how they get on in the polls today

KatiePricesKnickers · 07/05/2026 06:15

It’s hardly a smear campaign when he’s done the smearing himself?

Skinnysaluki · 07/05/2026 06:18

SoberannSerene · 06/05/2026 23:19

Yes - I feel for the original Green party members- must be difficult watching a charlatan like ZP hijack their party for his own ends .

Yes, I think they enjoyed being in an ineffectual comfort zone where everyone loved them (according to these threads) but no one thought to vote for them.
The way they were going, they’d have likely managed 8 or 9 MPs just at the point where the environment completely collapsed.

Ellen2shoes · 07/05/2026 06:48

@SoberannSerene no surprise there. The Spectator owned by Marshall who also owns GB news (that Reform propagandist mouthpiece channel which pays Farage 1m a year). Marshall and Murdoch - the right wing media monopoly intent on smearing.

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 06:55

KatiePricesKnickers · 07/05/2026 06:15

It’s hardly a smear campaign when he’s done the smearing himself?

Exactly - Polanski has fucked his own credibility by going too far and dropped quite a few political points after his comments criticising not the Golders Green attacker but the police who apprehended him.

Ellen2shoes · 07/05/2026 07:07

He’s been Corbynised by the right wing media for criticising Israel and for promoting peace in the ME. The war is a murky money machine for billionaires invested in fossil fuel and arms. ZP is calling it out. BP’s profits have doubled since the attack on Iran.

Farage and KB would have had UK troops in the war by now had they been in charge.

Ladyymuck · 07/05/2026 07:12

I agree OP and cannot understand his popularity. Akthough not a greens voter I always thought Caroline Lucas came across as genuine. I wonder what she makes of Zack Polanski.

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 07:17

Ellen2shoes · 07/05/2026 07:07

He’s been Corbynised by the right wing media for criticising Israel and for promoting peace in the ME. The war is a murky money machine for billionaires invested in fossil fuel and arms. ZP is calling it out. BP’s profits have doubled since the attack on Iran.

Farage and KB would have had UK troops in the war by now had they been in charge.

Starmer also was against getting too involved in the war, but he is not getting media attention ahead of the local elections for allowing too much antisemitism into the Labour Party or for trying to make money off gullible women (hypnosis re breast size).

People do have legitimate concerns which can’t all be swept under the rug by references to right wing media.

MadeInGrimsby · 07/05/2026 07:18

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 06:55

Exactly - Polanski has fucked his own credibility by going too far and dropped quite a few political points after his comments criticising not the Golders Green attacker but the police who apprehended him.

Exactly. He is the architect of his own misfortune. He'll blame "the right wing media" rather than take responsibility for his own ineptitude and folly. Also, The Guardian isn't exactly "right wing", and they exposed the hypnotherapy and the Red Cross misinformation.
It's like student politics, isn't it? Blame the media, blame the rich, don't self criticise, don't reflect, don't take responsibility.

ThatCyanCat · 07/05/2026 07:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Be fair, the Greens are also full of perverts, misogynists and people who use ChatGPT as a soothsayer (without understanding how it works; the poster appears to think it actually analyses the sources somehow rather than being a large language model that works on probabilities and prompts).

Lots of gloating about being a "threat" but it seems to me it's mostly Jews who are feeling threatened. And obviously, anyone who thinks the Greens have raised their profile because of their dedication to the environment is... deluded, shall we say. However, nobody does actually think that.

MadeInGrimsby · 07/05/2026 07:20

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 06:55

Exactly - Polanski has fucked his own credibility by going too far and dropped quite a few political points after his comments criticising not the Golders Green attacker but the police who apprehended him.

Plus the claim that Essa Suleiman was "handcuffed" when it's clear that he wasn't. It's as if ZP just doesn't focus on facts.

Lemonthyme · 07/05/2026 07:21

Bertiebiscuit · 06/05/2026 09:07

Everything about "zack Polanski" is fake - he was born David Paulden. He was never a "spokesman" for the Red Cross. He scammed women with fake hypnotism, He is a actor with a completely invented persona, he's no politician, he's a snake oil salesman. How can anyone vote for him?

He's a popularist like Farage, telling people things they want to hear rather than uncomfortable truths. Given a choice between him and Farage though I'd pick the Greens. But honestly because I'm a grown up, I can also manage to work out that there are common sense alternatives to both.

MadeInGrimsby · 07/05/2026 07:22

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 05:37

All political leaders or potential political leaders get heavily scrutinised - it’s part of the job.

Yes, and if you're not up for it, it's not the fault of the press.

Snorerephron · 07/05/2026 07:24

icepopsincoming · 06/05/2026 15:57

The Greens are doing well - other parties feel threatened and therefore are desperately trying to smear them, hence all these threads suddenly appearing.
No other reason. I'm voting Green instead of Labour locally. The Green Party in my town have been amazing for many, many years. The majority in my town agree and we are a very mixed and cultured bunch.

I'm a floating voter. Very much an environmentalist though. I agree there are some amazing green party councillors around and I am pleased to see the success.

I think picking ZP as leader was deeply naive and that it's going to backfire badly on the green party.

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 07:29

Snorerephron · 07/05/2026 07:24

I'm a floating voter. Very much an environmentalist though. I agree there are some amazing green party councillors around and I am pleased to see the success.

I think picking ZP as leader was deeply naive and that it's going to backfire badly on the green party.

I agree and wouldn’t say that he represents those who care deeply about the environment very well. It no longer seems to be the most important issue to the Green Party which even makes their name seem like a misnomer.

icepopsincoming · 07/05/2026 07:30

OneTealShaker · 07/05/2026 02:21

So you use ChatGPT to decide who to vote for?

Well, if that ain’t a cliche.

Haha.

yeah right if that's what you'd like to think

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 07:31

MadeInGrimsby · 07/05/2026 07:20

Plus the claim that Essa Suleiman was "handcuffed" when it's clear that he wasn't. It's as if ZP just doesn't focus on facts.

Yet the facts are there for others to see which is why he is being increasingly called out for not being honest.

Ellen2shoes · 07/05/2026 07:31

The press run the show and if they go after someone, they will bring them down. I wonder what horrors they will drag up next. Referring to himself as a spokesperson for the Red Cross - how very dare he the utterly evil man - when actually he is just heavily involved with supporting them and has spoken at events for them (but isn’t supposed to be politically affiliated). How corrupt and self serving he must be. Also I read that he once sneezed and didn’t thank the person who said bless you but I can’t find the source for that.

MadeInGrimsby · 07/05/2026 07:35

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 07:31

Yet the facts are there for others to see which is why he is being increasingly called out for not being honest.

Yes - it's all there. He and his followers are just sore than it's been picked up by the media - including the Guardian and the BBC. He's been proven to be a person lacking honesty and judgement.

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 07:36

Ellen2shoes · 07/05/2026 07:31

The press run the show and if they go after someone, they will bring them down. I wonder what horrors they will drag up next. Referring to himself as a spokesperson for the Red Cross - how very dare he the utterly evil man - when actually he is just heavily involved with supporting them and has spoken at events for them (but isn’t supposed to be politically affiliated). How corrupt and self serving he must be. Also I read that he once sneezed and didn’t thank the person who said bless you but I can’t find the source for that.

That particular lie - that he had been a spokesman for the Red Cross - was uncovered by the Guardian.

Hardly the “right wing media” you mentioned earlier, are they?

Lemonthyme · 07/05/2026 07:52

I do find the focus on ZP over the past few days interesting. When there's the story going on about Farage pocketing £5 million claiming it was ok because he wasn't a politician at the time and earning £2 million since becoming an MP.

Why people think he's some kind of saviour of the working class I have no idea.

Thing is though that working class, traditional Labour voters have, to a degree, been left by Labour. What a lot of left wingers don't really like is the fact these voters might be fiscally liberal but socially conservative. The Greens are fiscally liberal and socially liberal. Reform are fiscally conservative and socially very conservative. Labour have lost their way, becoming fiscally a bit conservative and socially a bit of a mish mash.

But do I think either ZP or NF give a crap about anybody but their own fame? Nope.

Problem is that it's a bit like the 1929 crash what happened in 2008 and we've never really recovered. We are getting echoes of that kind of shift in politics which happened in the 1930s where the hard right and hard left rose across Europe and beyond. We escaped the worst of the politics of that period but not the fall out from it.

Fact is, in my mind, it's so easy to be a popularist. You can just blame someone else all the time rather than point out some hard truths. That the world was made poorer in 2008 due to events in the US. Due to how financial institutions were poorly managed and regulated. And much as we want to put blame on X or Y, there is no fixing that in a way which isn't going to be kind of painful. With repeated governments all that has been done is QE and kicking the can down the road. The other major problem we have is the correction after 2008 was austerity. I'd draw a straight line from that to our levels of sickness in our population with a diversion via Covid measures as well. Then add to that our aging population due to the baby boomers and low birth rates (in part influenced by austerity) and we have a huge problem in the UK, low tax payer numbers, high tax recipient numbers with high levels of expensive to service debt from the bank bail outs (probably necessary but helped the richest the most), a history of austerity (which failed) and Covid support (some of it fraud). We shouldn't need to have had to fix that problem but we do and fixing it will not be pleasant.

So what do you do? That's what's up for grabs but trying to pretend we don't currently need immigration is bollocks. We do until we can get more people back in work (that's what pisses me off about Labour back benchers blocking some of that, it needs to be done but that's another story). We also need to cut in work benefits subsidising companies, which is why increasing minimum wage isn't an awful idea.

But also that's why being a member of the EU actually worked well because we had a lot of circular migration (people came to work in the UK as adults and a lot returned or didn't bring family) now we're out of the EU, more people move from further away but for good and with their families who tend to be more recipients than generators of tax revenue. That's why Brexit increased migration.

I'm not saying I have the fixes but what I am saying is both ZP and NF piss me off because their solutions are facile. They do not admit the realities of where we are and they do not admit fixing any of this will be hard.

Ellen2shoes · 07/05/2026 08:01

Twiglets1 · 07/05/2026 07:36

That particular lie - that he had been a spokesman for the Red Cross - was uncovered by the Guardian.

Hardly the “right wing media” you mentioned earlier, are they?

The Times broke the story

Swipe left for the next trending thread