Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Do people pretend not to know who people are in order to seem intelligent?

667 replies

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 09:35

Do people pretend not to know who people are in order to seem intelligent?

This question is prompted from reading comments online re The Met Gala?

Now let me prefix this by saying I have no interest in reality tv, Showbiz mags, etc - but surely there are some people who you know who they are because everybody does!

There were people saying "who" on a photo of Kim Kardashian. I have never seen an episode of the show, have no interest in her, but of course I know who she is - because how can you not?

Another British example is Jordan/Kate Price. No interest in her, but she has literally been headline news in The UK for 20 years. If you live in The UK - surely its impossible to not at least know who she is?

OP posts:
DandelionClockSeeds · 05/05/2026 12:39

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 10:03

Out of interest which of these could you pick out of a line up.

  1. David Beckham
  2. Meghan Markle
  3. Elon Musk
  4. Taylor Swift

Not read responses after this post, but, no. I couldn't pick any of them out. I could tell you why I know all their names.

But one 50 year old ex footballer looks much like another. I wouldn't have a clue if it was Beckham, Giggs, Gascoigne, Fowler etc etc etc.

I also won't recognise you in tesco if I only know you as the lady in the library.

MountainElf · 05/05/2026 12:39

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 10:03

Out of interest which of these could you pick out of a line up.

  1. David Beckham
  2. Meghan Markle
  3. Elon Musk
  4. Taylor Swift

I know who they all are but except from David Beckham I would have no idea. It's just not my wheel house and don't tend to watch much TV that would show these people. With more and more people streaming what they what they want to watch it's easy to miss out on some many celebs and famous people. For example I name the cast list for Supernatural but would not even know where to watch celebrity love island.

nam3c4ang3 · 05/05/2026 12:41

My parents and grandparents wouldn’t have a clue who these people are. Heard of them maybe - pick them out? Never. And thank goodness for that. Mind you - my 12 and 9 year old also won’t be able to tell you who they are either 🥴

PhaedraTwo · 05/05/2026 12:41

2dogsandabudgie · 05/05/2026 12:22

Stuart Hall is a convicted sex offender.

Stuart Hall was a cultural commentator and art historian.

I assume this was a tongue in cheek comment.

Stuart Hall certainly knew a lot about both high and low culture what with his professorship of sociology and hosting It's A Knockout.

I know who both are/ were and would know from the context which one was being referred to.

TheeNotoriousPIG · 05/05/2026 12:42

Do people pretend not to know who people are in order to seem intelligent?
I don't keep up with the news and I rarely watch TV. My interests are generally more swayed towards agriculture than reality TV, and I don't think we'll see Kim Kardashian and the likes on a farm any time soon.

Also, if I've seen an actor in a film, I tend to remember the name of the character that they are playing rather than their real name. E.g. when the chap who played Bilbo Baggins appeared on a phone advertisement, I wondered when phone signal had reached the Shire when it still remains patchy in my neck of the woods...

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 05/05/2026 12:44

I got mercilessly ribbed at a work pub quiz for answering a "fastest finger first" question about Kim Kardashian against 200 other people.

What they didn't focus on so much was the fact I had to correct the PhD mathematician's mental maths on a different question, and the trainee priest was stumped by a basic scripture question.

I have both trashy and non-trashy reasons for knowing a bit about the Kardashians.

But my main excuse is that I have a history degree. History students were all about the gossip and perceptions.

Nesbi · 05/05/2026 12:45

So many “news” stories about celebrities are predicated on the fact that you are supposed to be interested in the thing that happened purely because they are a celebrity.

Celebrity X gets robbed/burgled/stopped for drunk driving. Why is that any more newsworthy than the same thing happening to anyone else? The answer is…it isn’t.

Celebrity Y shares an opinion about something happening in the world. Why should I have the slightest interest in their opinion about the Iran war, or climate change, or dog ownership or any of the other countless things they feel compelled to tell us about unless they have any special knowledge or experience worth listening to!

It is remarkably easy to filter out all the crap about celebrity without even trying very hard.

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 12:48

Nesbi · 05/05/2026 12:45

So many “news” stories about celebrities are predicated on the fact that you are supposed to be interested in the thing that happened purely because they are a celebrity.

Celebrity X gets robbed/burgled/stopped for drunk driving. Why is that any more newsworthy than the same thing happening to anyone else? The answer is…it isn’t.

Celebrity Y shares an opinion about something happening in the world. Why should I have the slightest interest in their opinion about the Iran war, or climate change, or dog ownership or any of the other countless things they feel compelled to tell us about unless they have any special knowledge or experience worth listening to!

It is remarkably easy to filter out all the crap about celebrity without even trying very hard.

Of course something happening to somebody famous is more newsworthy.

I think what you probably mean is that is isn't any sadder, and I agree with that.

But to say the average person dying is as newsworthy as King Charles dying is just wrong.

OP posts:
SharonBe · 05/05/2026 12:48

I'm not sure I'd know Kim Kardashian if I saw her, I'd recognise the name. I might think she looked familiar. I watched some of the Met Gala online to see Connor Storrie and Hudson Williams but there were loads of people I did not recognise.

Also, I think, "who?" is just people saying, "this person is no longer relevant", not, "I do not know this person".

JudgeJ · 05/05/2026 12:52

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 10:03

Out of interest which of these could you pick out of a line up.

  1. David Beckham
  2. Meghan Markle
  3. Elon Musk
  4. Taylor Swift

Probably Beckham unless he's changed a lot.
Elon Musk, for much the same reason I would recognise Ed Sheerhan.

The other two, no, unless one was with her husband.

Lomonald · 05/05/2026 12:55

JudgeJ · 05/05/2026 12:52

Probably Beckham unless he's changed a lot.
Elon Musk, for much the same reason I would recognise Ed Sheerhan.

The other two, no, unless one was with her husband.

You would know taylor swift or Meghan Markle if they were with their husbands?

JustSawJohnny · 05/05/2026 12:55

Nothing to do with intelligence.

Jus general SM twattery.

mochimoons · 05/05/2026 12:56

My partner really doesn't know who a lot of people are and is rubbish at pop culture and even he would recognise Kim Kardashian - you'd have to live under a rock to not recognise her.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 05/05/2026 12:56

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 12:48

Of course something happening to somebody famous is more newsworthy.

I think what you probably mean is that is isn't any sadder, and I agree with that.

But to say the average person dying is as newsworthy as King Charles dying is just wrong.

I've often wondered what the criteria is for getting a BBC obituary. You see them now and them for minor actors, musicians and writers, and you wonder who's being paid to write/maintain these.

I guess AI can do it now, but my mum used to maintain obits for newspapers.

I guess there were far fewer TV shows back in the day, but I always feel a little whinge that licence fee money is being spent on commemorating someone who most people understand forty will never have heard of!

Nesbi · 05/05/2026 12:57

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 12:48

Of course something happening to somebody famous is more newsworthy.

I think what you probably mean is that is isn't any sadder, and I agree with that.

But to say the average person dying is as newsworthy as King Charles dying is just wrong.

Like it or not the king is a significant figure whose death has political and constitutional significance. But an actor being caught drink driving, or having an affair, or being robbed - why is that significant? Why does their choice of career suddenly elevate these things into “news” stories?

Candlesniffin · 05/05/2026 12:59

Pretty much the only media I consume is radio 4, so unless they pop up on there, i wont know about them, and even then I wont know their face 🤷‍♀️ my social media algorhythm is very carefully curated to nature and gardens only! I dont read any mags/newspapers or watch much telly, or go to see films.

OldieButBaddie · 05/05/2026 12:59

I wouldn't know what Kim Kardashian looks like, Katie Price I think I would but last time I did see a pic of her she looked so different that I didn't recognise her, but I can't be sure!

I have just flicked through the pictures, I recognised Rihanna, Beyonce, Margot Robbie, Nicole Kidman, Anna Wintour, Cher, Kate Moss, Donatella Versace (quite shocked as I though she had died)

I know of these people but didn't recognise them
Sabrina Carpenter (though I have heard her name)
Kendall Jenner (something to do with Kardashians?)
Kylie Jenner (ditto)
Jay-Z (the dreads fooled me)
Venus Williams (she looked fab but not seen her with hair like that)
Kim Kardashian
Bad Bunny
Gigi Hadid
Madonna (didn't look like her!)

I have no idea who the following people are
Lena Mahtouf (love the hands on her dress lol)
Ashley Graham
Tessa Thompson
LISA
Sabine Getty
Hailey Bieber (something to do with Justin Bieber?)
Bhavitha Mandava (big up to her for wearing jeans!)
Jamie McCarthy
Chloe Malle
Teyana Taylor
Zoe Kravitz
Daisy Edgar-Jones
Tyla
Cardi B (she seemed to be earing some intestines?!)
Doechii
Chase Infiniti (thought she was Scary Spice)
Alex Consani (needs a good meal)
Gracie Abrams
Sarah Paulson

Plus a billion others!

Got bored of looking after that, my general observation is CHEER UP EVERYONE YOU ARE AT A PARTY!

SerafinasGoose · 05/05/2026 13:00

Sartre · 05/05/2026 12:05

Am I missing something? Perhaps too young for the reference, or do you mean because Hall abandoned his PhD? Not all academics have one, some of my colleagues only have a masters but lecture based on professional background which works better in some circumstances e.g business, law, journalism.

There are two Stuart Halls. That was the point the previous poster was trying to make, and I responded in that vein.

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 13:00

Nesbi · 05/05/2026 12:57

Like it or not the king is a significant figure whose death has political and constitutional significance. But an actor being caught drink driving, or having an affair, or being robbed - why is that significant? Why does their choice of career suddenly elevate these things into “news” stories?

Because people care about them.

Not everybody - but lots of people care about Cristiano Ronaldo, Adele, David Beckham, Madonna etc.

So of course Madonna crashing her car whilst tanked up is going to be more newsworthy than Julie who works at the launderette doing the same thing.

But you know that don't you?

OP posts:
Another2Cats · 05/05/2026 13:02

coulditbeme2323 · 05/05/2026 11:22

I think people are missing the point of I am not interested in X or not interested in Y.

If you have no interest in rock music I would expect most people to know who Mick Jagger is.

If you have no interest in politics I would expect you to know who Trump is.

If you have no interest in movies I would expect you to know who Tom Hanks is.

Not because you are interested in that subject, but because how can you not know them?

"...but because how can you not know them?"

Perhaps part of the argument in this thread stems from this being such a vague statement.

What do you actually mean by "not know them"?

Do you mean that you have literally never heard this person's name before?

In which case, it is quite likely that the very large majority of people do indeed "know" Kim Kardashian. But for quite a few of them that is the only thing that they will "know" - her name.

In contrast, there are quite a few younger people who very definitely do not "know" Mick Jagger, even using that definition.

.

Or, on the other hand, do you mean that you actually "know" something about them?

For example, to somebody of my generation, it seems obvious that "how can you not know" that Mick Jagger was the lead singer of the Rolling Stones.

But I am certain that there are very many younger people who will not know this or anything else about him.

So, what do you actually mean by "not know them"?

cantstartagain · 05/05/2026 13:02

Lomonald · 05/05/2026 09:40

If anybody is saying "who" to Kim K they are definitely acting ignorant and probably are being obtuse, i think it just makes look silly when they act superior like that.

Tbf I didn’t actually recognise her straight away

Bbq1 · 05/05/2026 13:02

My mum is 86 and knows who both KK and KP are without ever having watched anything featuring them. My mum is great though and really switched on for her age, my ds, 20 always comments on how modern thinking she is.

Zov · 05/05/2026 13:03

SerafinasGoose · 05/05/2026 11:39

Nothing 'snobbish' about being into or not into popular culture: most people are to a certain extent. You can like rock and opera, classic and trash lit, tennis and football all at the same time, you know.

And it depends what area of popular culture you're talking about. I could name you every line-up of QOTSA or Rammstein, or know every lyric of a Metallica song, but although I know what Taylor Swift or Katy Perry look like I couldn't name a track of theirs at gunpoint . As for Kim Kardashian, I could point her out if you showed me an identity line-up, but as for who she actually is and what she does, I wouldn't have a clue.

Does it really matter?

See, that phrase 'trash lit' is snobby in itself. Some people are completely oblivious to how their 'I don't listen to watch/listen to/read such trash' comments are coming across. Some people ARE snobby, and look down on people who watch reality TV, pop culture shows, and listen to popular music artists and the like... They won't admit it (most of them,) because I don't think they realise how snobby they are being.........

I also find it very hard to believe that someone could not name one single Taylor Swift song, or that they thought Taylor was a man until last year! Unless you live in a cave and have never used the internet, I find all this unlikely.

Every person on this thread is on the internet, sooooo.

.

MaryBeardsShoes · 05/05/2026 13:04

Lomonald · 05/05/2026 09:40

If anybody is saying "who" to Kim K they are definitely acting ignorant and probably are being obtuse, i think it just makes look silly when they act superior like that.

I know Kim Kardashian exists but this thread has made me realise I don’t actually know what she looks like.

There are lots of people on Taskmaster that I’ve never heard of. I would say most series I only know 2 or 3 of the contestants.

I’m not particularly trying to be “high brow” I just haven’t come across those people before.

TicketsAgain · 05/05/2026 13:06

Some awareness of there being an event in the USA called the Met Gala is basic general knowledge I would have thought. Being ignorant about that is not something to brag about.