Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

parkrun defending their position

740 replies

Funtime2 · 26/04/2026 11:52

I used to be a parkrunner and do not understand how parkrun can defend their position of allowing trans identfying males into the female category.

I read that 280 published race winners in the female category are actually men identifying as women. How is this fair to women? Some women don’t care about this but some women do, just as some men take it as a race and care about the rankings and some men don’t

The other option of course is they could stop the timing, stop recording winners and records?

AIBU to genuinely not understand why parkrun claim not to be a race when they time the runners, publish times by category, rank times and runners, and have record holders by category.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
ThatBlackCat · Today 14:59

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 13:55

Olympics is different - it's professional athletes at a world class level so of course fairness matters.

It ain't Park Run, which isn't a competition at all. I think people on here think because times are recorded, it's a competition, but it isn't.

Er, yeah, it's a competition. And we all know it.

parkrun defending their position
Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 14:59

ThatBlackCat · Today 14:55

As opposed to a pro-trans/anti-women echo chamber? Ever tried Reddit?

No, because - as I've said upthread - I am actually fairly gender critical. I just think it's ruined feminism by working with the hard right and alienating minority groups, so don't get involved in GC forums any more. Also because, as you've demonstrated, any 'discussions' quickly turn into personal insults and ad hominem attacks and I can't be arsed with that.

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:00

ThatBlackCat · Today 14:59

Er, yeah, it's a competition. And we all know it.

It isn't though.

DuchessofStaffordshire · Today 15:00

givemushypeasachance · Today 14:53

Okay you're back on my I'll get rid of the timekeepers and barcode scanners and 9am start proposal then. Everyone just go and cover 5km in the park at a time of your choosing.

If you want to retain the competitive element of Parkrun, then the competition needs to be made as fair as practicably possible.

WeMeetInFairIthilien · Today 15:01

How can there be a world record, if it isn't a competition?

Funtime2 · Today 15:01

givemushypeasachance · Today 14:53

Okay you're back on my I'll get rid of the timekeepers and barcode scanners and 9am start proposal then. Everyone just go and cover 5km in the park at a time of your choosing.

Why can’t people still run together if they don’t get a time from the event? That’s inclusive and fun right?

OP posts:
Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:02

WeMeetInFairIthilien · Today 15:01

How can there be a world record, if it isn't a competition?

There are world records for everything. Biggest cake. Loudest fart. You name it.

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:03

DuchessofStaffordshire · Today 15:00

If you want to retain the competitive element of Parkrun, then the competition needs to be made as fair as practicably possible.

Yes - and the important bit of your statement is that it's got to be practicably possible, which expecting volunteers to police participants on the basis of sex (not age, as that isn't a thing) would not be.

DuchessofStaffordshire · Today 15:04

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:03

Yes - and the important bit of your statement is that it's got to be practicably possible, which expecting volunteers to police participants on the basis of sex (not age, as that isn't a thing) would not be.

Edited

Exactly. But requesting participants to register by sex would be.

ThatBlackCat · Today 15:05

givemushypeasachance · Today 14:49

So you want me as a run director to police whether someone who has ticked the "female" box when they registered is really a woman? Or if not me, parkrun HQ? has this very long thread suggested how that would be done, are we going full producing copies of birth certificates?

No, since males cheat I want no categories or rankings or timings at...all. That is less work for you.

DuchessofStaffordshire · Today 15:05

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:02

There are world records for everything. Biggest cake. Loudest fart. You name it.

And to have been judged the loudest fart, they would have had to have been in completion with other, less impressive, farts.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Today 15:06

ThatBlackCat · Today 14:54

No. You're not getting it. It's not possible to police since men will always lie and cheat.

Having no categories at all, no timings, no rankings, no barcodes (I'm not a chocolate bar, I don't need to be scanned); is the exact opposite of being policed.

A lot of people (me included) enjoy the community aspect of Park Run, the coming together for social reasons as well as health. You take away all that, you might as well be going for a run by yourself.
I like the timings as I like to be part of a run, and see how well I do as opposed to how I did the week before.
Enjoying the run layout without competing against everyone else.
If park run isn't for you, you want it competitive, there's so many more runs out there more suitable instead of trying to get it to bend to your way.

ThatBlackCat · Today 15:06

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 14:50

I volunteer now and absolutely would not if I was expected to do anything like that.

The whole point is since it's been ascertained men won't cheat, then we need zero categories. Zero rankings. Zero timings taken. That means less work for you. How can you argue against that?

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:07

DuchessofStaffordshire · Today 15:05

And to have been judged the loudest fart, they would have had to have been in completion with other, less impressive, farts.

I am, in fairness, not sure how you could ever decide on the loudest fart. I fear it would largely be subjective and could lead to angry riots if wrongly called.

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:08

ThatBlackCat · Today 15:06

The whole point is since it's been ascertained men won't cheat, then we need zero categories. Zero rankings. Zero timings taken. That means less work for you. How can you argue against that?

Why has it been ascertained that men won't cheat? And why does this mean we should abolish Parkrun to make things fair for women? I don't follow your reasoning here.

ThatBlackCat · Today 15:08

givemushypeasachance · Today 14:53

Okay you're back on my I'll get rid of the timekeepers and barcode scanners and 9am start proposal then. Everyone just go and cover 5km in the park at a time of your choosing.

No. Have the time it starts. Just make it a free for all general fun run. That's all.

givemushypeasachance · Today 15:08

Funtime2 · Today 15:01

Why can’t people still run together if they don’t get a time from the event? That’s inclusive and fun right?

They can and do! There are loads of community groups that organise group runs in an informal way. My running club puts on multiple sessions every week. Good Gym, 5K Your Way for people recovering from and battling cancer, there's all sorts.

Also, if you want a 5km timed run or walk on the same course at 9am each week, you can come to parkrun. We welcome everyone even those who bizarrely believe other participants are "cheating men" trying to "steal wins from women". I don't agree but I'll still time you and record your result along with the many thousands of others from the event over the years.

Funtime2 · Today 15:08

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:03

Yes - and the important bit of your statement is that it's got to be practicably possible, which expecting volunteers to police participants on the basis of sex (not age, as that isn't a thing) would not be.

Edited

Arghhhhhhhh

NO ONE NEEDS TO POLICE IT

argghhhhhh

do you police age??

OP posts:
ThatBlackCat · Today 15:09

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 14:53

You don't police age because being trans-age isn't a thing. So volunteers know they won't have to police that, whereas they might well end up having to police trans-identified individuals and I would not feel comfortable, as an occasional Parkrun volunteer, doing that. At the moment you don't have to police anything and that's what's best for something as large and non-competitive as Parkrun.

trans-age isn't a thing

Yes it is. Haven't you seen the many, many photos of males in little girl dresses and dummies? Or the man that identifies as a 6 year old girl?

WeMeetInFairIthilien · Today 15:10

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:07

I am, in fairness, not sure how you could ever decide on the loudest fart. I fear it would largely be subjective and could lead to angry riots if wrongly called.

One would use a decibel metre, a piece of kit that measures the volume of a sound. And therefore, has a clear definition of loudest - the fart with the highest number of decibels

ThatBlackCat · Today 15:11

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 14:56

So basically no Parkrun. You're suggesting we just get rid of it completely as that's the only way to be fair to women?

No! I am suggesting it be a general run/walk. That's all. With no timings or anything like that.

It's not our fault we can't have nice things because men hate women and cheat

givemushypeasachance · Today 15:12

ThatBlackCat · Today 15:11

No! I am suggesting it be a general run/walk. That's all. With no timings or anything like that.

It's not our fault we can't have nice things because men hate women and cheat

Again - I'm parkrunning right now. Can't you see?

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 15:12

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Today 15:06

A lot of people (me included) enjoy the community aspect of Park Run, the coming together for social reasons as well as health. You take away all that, you might as well be going for a run by yourself.
I like the timings as I like to be part of a run, and see how well I do as opposed to how I did the week before.
Enjoying the run layout without competing against everyone else.
If park run isn't for you, you want it competitive, there's so many more runs out there more suitable instead of trying to get it to bend to your way.

It's a big community thing. Lots of the regulars do 'Parkrun takeovers' where they run it, and I am also volunteering next month with a local charity that's doing a takeover. I really love that aspect of it - it feels important in today's society when we're all set against each other half the time. To me, making a big (pointless, seeing as it wouldn't be policed anyway) issue out of the trans thing does actually make it less inclusive, which spoils some of the focus on community. Others may disagree and that's their right but I think it works pretty well as it is.

Funtime2 · Today 15:12

ThatBlackCat · Today 15:06

The whole point is since it's been ascertained men won't cheat, then we need zero categories. Zero rankings. Zero timings taken. That means less work for you. How can you argue against that?

that Is the most pathetic reason not to have a rule.

we won’t have a rule that rape is illegal because it’s nearly always impossible to get a conviction.

OP posts:
BananaPeels · Today 15:12

ThatBlackCat · Today 15:08

No. Have the time it starts. Just make it a free for all general fun run. That's all.

But that is not what park run was set up for. You have completely changed the premise of the whole thing.

if people want that then they need to set up a completely new thing and revert park run back to its original purpose of time trials.