Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Benefits v Defence Lord Robertson

645 replies

Wednesdayschild87 · 14/04/2026 23:46

Lord Robertson’s Speech… seriously does anyone care?? He’s laid out the fact that as a nation we can’t carry on like this… he said we can’t afford to keep throwing money at benefits whilst leaving our country defences I’m actually shocked no one has come out and spoken on this matter before. I’m incredulous.

OP posts:
littleorangefox · 16/04/2026 09:46

TigerRag · 16/04/2026 09:42

Oh really? Why are so many people going to tribunal? I know people who are blind who've had to take their claim to tribunal

Sorry, I think you've misunderstood my comment. It was a sarcastic reply to the person who clearly thinks it is easy to obtain benefits. I very much object to that (ignorant) mindset.

User33538216 · 16/04/2026 09:49

hedgeknight · 14/04/2026 23:52

Do you include pensions in the out of control benefit bill?

I think the state pension should be means tested.

MyLuckyHelper · 16/04/2026 10:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Gall10 · 16/04/2026 10:09

lovealieinortwo · 15/04/2026 17:52

Do you realise the cost of child benefit vs pensioner benefits? And let’s not forgot many of those pensioners received child benefit or the equivalent when they started families and it wasn’t means tested!

Child benefit on top of 2 x £49k salaries is a shit load more that £12k annual pension !

ThingsAreNotWhatTheyWere · 16/04/2026 10:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

This with bells on. Though I suspect it will be like water off a duck's back...

MyLuckyHelper · 16/04/2026 10:12

ThingsAreNotWhatTheyWere · 16/04/2026 10:11

This with bells on. Though I suspect it will be like water off a duck's back...

At this point I can't believe this poster is genuine. Even the most anti benefits people surely wouldn't have that attitude to someone potentially ending their own life because of their illness.

MyLuckyHelper · 16/04/2026 10:15

Gall10 · 16/04/2026 10:09

Child benefit on top of 2 x £49k salaries is a shit load more that £12k annual pension !

Child benefit for one child is £1406.60/year. Two children is £2337.40. Even for ten children it's £9783.80.

We're not talking about household income. We're talking about the cost of providing the benefits they receive on top of their household income.

x2boys · 16/04/2026 10:18

Hamalam · 16/04/2026 09:01

69% of 25 year olds claiming disability benefits are claiming it for mental health conditions. Does anyone think that these claims are valid?

For many people who develop severe and enduring mental illness,s the symptons start to emerge around late teens early twenties.

FernandoSor · 16/04/2026 10:27

Lavenderflower · 15/04/2026 17:56

This country doesn’t make or produce anything - the birth rate has declined and the cost of living is too high. How are they going fund a war or military?

We are the 11th largest manufacturer in the world and manufacturing contributes to 40% of our exports.

Have you honestly never heard of BAe, Rolls-Royce, AstraZeneca, Unilever, JLR?

Seymour5 · 16/04/2026 11:14

Gall10 · 16/04/2026 10:09

Child benefit on top of 2 x £49k salaries is a shit load more that £12k annual pension !

£12k would be nice! DH, 80, paid NI contributions both employed and self employed from age 15. His state pension is under £10K. About twice as much as mine. I wish people would realise there are two different state pension rates.

Men born before April 1945 required 44 qualifying years for the basic amount, which is currently £184.90. Then it dropped down to 30 years. New state pension rate, 35 years contributions, £241.30.

www.moneysavingexpert.com/pensions/state-pensions/#what

nearlylovemyusername · 16/04/2026 11:30

Pickledonion1999 · 16/04/2026 08:14

People who have been off work for years are never going to get employed again. I see loads of them in my job, usually middle aged men who've not worked for years on end. Low level mh issues, then drift into being carers for parents. There are loads of them. My colleague has a friend who is 50, not worked for years, has anxiety and gets her husband to speak for her at PIP assessments etc. Doesn't stop her doing most things though, riding her bike, looking after grandkids, weekends away, fairground rides. It's just a way of life for many, they have no intention of ever trying to get back to work.

They have to rely on families then. Or pick fruits. And this has to be communicated widely so society understands that there is no option to be funded by taxpayer your entire lifetime. Unless severely disabled.

nearlylovemyusername · 16/04/2026 11:42

HelenaWaiting · 16/04/2026 01:53

What are YOU going to do when society breaks down and epidemic disease is rife because of all the sick people living on the streets?

Oh, and the engineered panic about the benefits bill? Read this.

When you've digested that, try to understand that, as countless disabled people have explained a zillion times, shoving long-term sick and disabled people into jobs will not cut the PIP bill because PIP is paid whether we work or not.

UK is one of the very few countries which "pays" for disabilities. It's not something available in other OECD countries. They provide equipment, treatments, etc, but not cash payments. This drives behavior.

Goring-by-Sea benefit cheat Catherine Wieland caught ziplining in Mexico - BBC News
There are plenty of examples like this and thanks to SM a lot of people jump on this bandwagon.

Not a single person ever proposed cutting benefits for truly disabled, those who cannot do any physical or professional work, but criteria definitely has to be reviewed.

TigerRag · 16/04/2026 12:03

nearlylovemyusername · 16/04/2026 11:42

UK is one of the very few countries which "pays" for disabilities. It's not something available in other OECD countries. They provide equipment, treatments, etc, but not cash payments. This drives behavior.

Goring-by-Sea benefit cheat Catherine Wieland caught ziplining in Mexico - BBC News
There are plenty of examples like this and thanks to SM a lot of people jump on this bandwagon.

Not a single person ever proposed cutting benefits for truly disabled, those who cannot do any physical or professional work, but criteria definitely has to be reviewed.

They did this with pip. They claimed the truly disabled wouldn't be affected. But so many have gone to tribunal and won

Alexandra2001 · 16/04/2026 13:25

nearlylovemyusername · 16/04/2026 11:42

UK is one of the very few countries which "pays" for disabilities. It's not something available in other OECD countries. They provide equipment, treatments, etc, but not cash payments. This drives behavior.

Goring-by-Sea benefit cheat Catherine Wieland caught ziplining in Mexico - BBC News
There are plenty of examples like this and thanks to SM a lot of people jump on this bandwagon.

Not a single person ever proposed cutting benefits for truly disabled, those who cannot do any physical or professional work, but criteria definitely has to be reviewed.

Quick Google... Canada, Italy, France and Germany give payments for disabilities, how else would they live?

Germany pays significantly more than we ever would, dependent on previous employment input.
France over 1000 euros per month.

I expect i would find most countries do....

However, the thread has completely gone off topic and become just another pile on against the disabled and nothing to do with increased Defence spending, which will require tax increases because thats the only way we can fund defence in the timescale that is required.
We could also be looking at some sort of Defence Bond, bought, with a guaranteed return to fund our countries defence.

Money is needed now, not in 5 or 10 years time.

Chocaholick · 16/04/2026 13:35

TigerRag · 16/04/2026 12:03

They did this with pip. They claimed the truly disabled wouldn't be affected. But so many have gone to tribunal and won

In which case they need to further tighten. We have the equivalent of the entire population of Scotland on disability benefits.

mydogisthebest · 16/04/2026 14:07

SomedayIllBeSaturdayNight · 16/04/2026 09:10

Why would they not be? They have been assessed and found to be valid I assume.

Assessed by who. My neighbour only had to have his GP assess him. He is meant to have such bad anxiety he cannot leave his house so therefore cannot possibly work. Strange then that he leaves his house every day to go shopping, walk his dogs, see his girlfriend etc and best of all WORK cash in hand. So getting benefits he is not entitled to and not paying tax or NI

mydogisthebest · 16/04/2026 14:09

littleorangefox · 16/04/2026 09:39

Sure. It's not that difficult. Just say you're anxious/depressed for a few years then start raking in the benefits.

Say you have such bad anxiety you can't leave your house so cannot work. Undoubtedly your GP will back you up.

That's what my neighbour said 4 years ago and yet he leaves his house just about every day - shopping, dog walking, going out with his girlfriend and working cash in hand 4 or 5 days a week!!!!

x2boys · 16/04/2026 14:21

mydogisthebest · 16/04/2026 14:07

Assessed by who. My neighbour only had to have his GP assess him. He is meant to have such bad anxiety he cannot leave his house so therefore cannot possibly work. Strange then that he leaves his house every day to go shopping, walk his dogs, see his girlfriend etc and best of all WORK cash in hand. So getting benefits he is not entitled to and not paying tax or NI

PIP dont take GP evidence very seriously
They would be wanting to see evidence from mental health professionals.

TigerRag · 16/04/2026 14:33

mydogisthebest · 16/04/2026 14:07

Assessed by who. My neighbour only had to have his GP assess him. He is meant to have such bad anxiety he cannot leave his house so therefore cannot possibly work. Strange then that he leaves his house every day to go shopping, walk his dogs, see his girlfriend etc and best of all WORK cash in hand. So getting benefits he is not entitled to and not paying tax or NI

Hmm I always wonder how people know so much about their neighbours medical issues? Sure I know my neighbour has PTSD and she knows I have dual sensory loss. But that's all. We don't know the ins and outs like other posters supposedly do

MyLuckyHelper · 16/04/2026 14:44

TigerRag · 16/04/2026 14:33

Hmm I always wonder how people know so much about their neighbours medical issues? Sure I know my neighbour has PTSD and she knows I have dual sensory loss. But that's all. We don't know the ins and outs like other posters supposedly do

Agree, everyone on MN seems to know not only the full health history of their neighbours/relatives/mums in the playground but also their benefit status and ins and outs of their bank account. Which, if I were committing fraud, I'd probably keep quiet.

MyLuckyHelper · 16/04/2026 14:44

mydogisthebest · 16/04/2026 14:09

Say you have such bad anxiety you can't leave your house so cannot work. Undoubtedly your GP will back you up.

That's what my neighbour said 4 years ago and yet he leaves his house just about every day - shopping, dog walking, going out with his girlfriend and working cash in hand 4 or 5 days a week!!!!

I hope you've reported him for fraud then.

littleorangefox · 16/04/2026 15:04

mydogisthebest · 16/04/2026 14:09

Say you have such bad anxiety you can't leave your house so cannot work. Undoubtedly your GP will back you up.

That's what my neighbour said 4 years ago and yet he leaves his house just about every day - shopping, dog walking, going out with his girlfriend and working cash in hand 4 or 5 days a week!!!!

People don't qualify for disability related benefits based solely on the word of a GP who has had a patient tell them a bit of info about their condition. Anyone who believes that is either completely ignorant or playing the faux naive card. There are extensive medical assessments and evidence required and it is extremely difficult to be awarded things like LCW/LCWRA, PIP, ADP etc for mental health reasons.

Locutus2000 · 16/04/2026 15:10

littleorangefox · 16/04/2026 15:04

People don't qualify for disability related benefits based solely on the word of a GP who has had a patient tell them a bit of info about their condition. Anyone who believes that is either completely ignorant or playing the faux naive card. There are extensive medical assessments and evidence required and it is extremely difficult to be awarded things like LCW/LCWRA, PIP, ADP etc for mental health reasons.

Don't be coming here with your facts. People want to believe the shite they read in the DM/FB/MN etc so they can feel superior to those fraudulent lazy UC and PIP claimants.

Needspaceforlego · 16/04/2026 15:12

BarbiesDreamHome · 16/04/2026 08:47

I think there have been a lot of answers like this and I suppose what this raises for me is that if we don't want asylum seekers in the armed forces because they can't be trusted, do you think they should be in the UK at all? Because if you don't want them in the army, you probably don't want them living next to your nan.

So what's the solution for those people?

And there have been a few points made about wanting the best of the best, knowing you can rely on those next to you, not wanting NEETS etc, yet there is targeted recruitment from the armed forces in deprived areas and results in many of these entrants going into low ranking roles (compared to privately educated children who are more likely to go onto a fast track senior progression route).

My answer is that these asylum seekers should be investigated and returned to their country of origin within 7 days

Gay, trans whatever are not reasons to be given asylum in the UK. Cheerio folks.
Returning people quickly will also discourage others from coming to the UK.

Sunglade · 16/04/2026 17:01

Needspaceforlego · 16/04/2026 15:12

My answer is that these asylum seekers should be investigated and returned to their country of origin within 7 days

Gay, trans whatever are not reasons to be given asylum in the UK. Cheerio folks.
Returning people quickly will also discourage others from coming to the UK.

There are way too many people profiting from the asylum industry to ever let it stop. Lawyers profiting from handling their cases, landlord profiting from taking their government paid rent, the smugglers profiting from sending them over. Not to mention a lot of politicians and other professionals have investments in property which is inflated because of all this. It won't stop until there's no one left to contribute the tax used to pay for them.