Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Irritated that families on UC get heavily discounted entry

1000 replies

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
cobrakaieaglefang · 09/04/2026 18:53

Some people need to save their froth for companies, organisations and public offices for paying such poor wages that require someone working a 40+ hour week to need top up benefits and concessions. When DC were little we could have done with those types of concessions particularly for educational experiences. They weren't a thing then, only disabled concessions which didn't apply.

When DC2 was 9 we were given free tickets to a Maritime Day at Portsmouth. We took sandwiches and had a brilliant day. DC2 was very interested in marine biology and spent a great deal of time with uni students talking to and learning from them. He remembers that day nearly 30 years later.
30 years on DH is disabled, I can often get carer free or discount on entry to places, too darned right I take advantage of that.

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 18:53

Ninjasan · 09/04/2026 18:51

I just looked at booking Queen Elizabeth through fashion exhibition in London. I can't afford it. Adult is 22 and my teenage daughter is 14 pounds. UC 'poor' have it for 1 pound. I hope they enjoy it. My child and I will not.

You could save up for it.
People on UC may need to do so too, just to afford to get there

Frugalgal · 09/04/2026 18:53

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

What kind of professional career are you in and yet you're so ignorant as to think the governments sets the price of entry at amusement parks?

Ochtawa · 09/04/2026 18:54

user1471538283 · 09/04/2026 18:45

In my experience when we were on benefits I couldn't have afforded to visit attractions anyway. We didn't live that far from one but it would be the cost of the bus fare and possibly a drink whilst there as well as the entrance fee.

But by cutting off these reduced rates it will only affect the children. I want to be in a society that treats all children as equal.

Yeah exactly. It's not just the ticket price but all the associated costs and logistics of a day out, especially for families who don't have a car. Offering free entry removes one barrier which is great, but the other barriers still have to be navigated. I can't imagine there are many families on the kind of income that qualifies for UC spending their time merrily trotting up and down the country from one museum to the next with not a care in the world.

ladyvimes · 09/04/2026 18:54

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:36

Exactly this. And for this reason it’s not fair. Let me be clear, I am not jealous. I enjoy working, and I’m proud of how hard I work. I don’t want to go on benefits. But it’s the injustice of it that angers me. People on lower incomes can’t get absolutely everything free and subsidised. There needs to be a line drawn. That’s why we’re in a country where people are having kids by the state. It’s wrong. I’m not aiming this at people who have fallen on hard times. It’s those of us in middle incomes that are contributing to all of these taxes, and we get very, very little back!!! We deserve something in return for our hard work and sacrifice. I understand these are private companies and not government owned, but it’s the same principle. Why bother going to work?!

Do you have any idea of the statistics around children from families receiving benefits and A’Level achievement or university admissions? It is shockingly low! UC enables social mobility and gives children a small chance in life to actually have choices and opportunities. I can’t believe anyone would begrudge children being able to access educational and cultural experiences.

FKAT · 09/04/2026 18:54

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:51

Like the unemployed can move into these professional jobs.

How are they professional jobs if they don't pay you enough to take your child to the zoo?

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:54

Merryoldgoat · 09/04/2026 18:52

I agree. Everyone on UC has loads of money. That’s why there are no food banks, no homeless families in temporary accommodation, no children on poverty etc.

You do realise most UC claimants are IN WORK don’t you? Our government is subsidising poverty-level wages. That’s what we should be angry about - not people who need it to live.

Why does that mean they get entry into Kew Gardens for a pound tho?

inickedthisname · 09/04/2026 18:54

reportedly · 09/04/2026 18:33

Why is this always the response on these threads? So working people aren’t allowed to moan basically.

It was a direct response to her saying there’s no difference in either lifestyle. If she really believes that, why doesn’t she see for herself?

If the only way you can feel satisfied with your life is by taking something away from others, then something is wrong.

onceandneveragain · 09/04/2026 18:54

DreamingOfGeneHunt · 09/04/2026 18:01

I'm middle class, I work, and I get UC, am I allowed a discount?

I get you're asking this to make a point, but, actually, yes, you are! You only have to get UC to be able to take advantage of it, they won't chuck you out if you take some hummus and crudites for a picnic instead of a big mac (hopefully it is obvious tongue is firmly in cheek here)

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:54

FKAT · 09/04/2026 18:54

How are they professional jobs if they don't pay you enough to take your child to the zoo?

Are you ok? Have you banged your head?

hedgeknight · 09/04/2026 18:54

Dragonflytamer · 09/04/2026 18:50

Unfortunately some of us have to pay for gravy train otherwise we'd be in economic ruin. We can't all be pisstakers or we will run out of piss.

Aw diddums

If you are under 25, you can get a discounted Reform membership.

EARCphilip · 09/04/2026 18:55

Do we?! That’s news to me! I’ll start booking some days out!

Sonato · 09/04/2026 18:56

hoarahloux · 09/04/2026 17:56

You're right OP, people on benefits should stay inside out of sight and never have any fun. They should know their place. It's a travesty that underprivileged children are given the chance to experience fun days out, they don't deserve it at all.

🙄

Thats not what shes saying and you know it.

My stepson and his wife work FT with two children, just above the UC threshold

They would have loved to take their little ones to any of the attractions listed but the costs were prohibitive.

They are no better off than people on UC being so close to the cliffedge, so reduced rates for some and not all really grate.

Its performative, its unjust, and it rightly makes those of us who pay into the system more than a bit pissed off.

Itsmetheflamingo · 09/04/2026 18:56

These reform bots are everywhere today, UC entry is their latest hate diatribe.

I saw someone post earlier “reform- looking after our own. Apart from when they’re poor”

carnivalqueenthethird · 09/04/2026 18:56

Dweetfidilove · 09/04/2026 18:25

The beautiful thing about capitalism is that companies do not discriminate in the manner you do. They'll adjust their prices in anyway that allows them access to everyone's dime - the rich, the poor and the in between.

That’s the point I’m making thought isn’t it? The ‘in between’ as you so eloquently put it, can’t access these businesses because we can’t afford to go!

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:56

Sonato · 09/04/2026 18:56

Thats not what shes saying and you know it.

My stepson and his wife work FT with two children, just above the UC threshold

They would have loved to take their little ones to any of the attractions listed but the costs were prohibitive.

They are no better off than people on UC being so close to the cliffedge, so reduced rates for some and not all really grate.

Its performative, its unjust, and it rightly makes those of us who pay into the system more than a bit pissed off.

EXACTLY.

littleorangefox · 09/04/2026 18:56

onceandneveragain · 09/04/2026 18:54

I get you're asking this to make a point, but, actually, yes, you are! You only have to get UC to be able to take advantage of it, they won't chuck you out if you take some hummus and crudites for a picnic instead of a big mac (hopefully it is obvious tongue is firmly in cheek here)

Well that's just absurd. Who would take a Big Mac in their picnic?? It would get cold and the cheese goes all weird round the edges.

Usernamechanging · 09/04/2026 18:57

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

Bollox. What utter bollox.

You can be on UC and:
Work
Own your own home
Pay for childcare
Pay full charges for utilities snd Council Tax
Not be in receipt of free school meals
Have the desire for your children to be educated through the medium of local heritage
Be middle class in every way possible other than income

I was a single parent of 3, one with a disability, and working full time as a teacher. Still got Tax Credits snd would have got UC had I been switched over before my youngest left school. I also tutored, marked A Level exams and ran a summer holiday club. In other words, wages in this country are shit and many of us are a) doing the best we can whilst b) claiming what the rules say we are entitled to.

So darling, do sod off with your middle class rhetoric that bears no resemblance to real life. Be grateful for what you have; not what you don't.

So sick and tired of deliberate misunderstanding of how many people live.

Vanillabourbon · 09/04/2026 18:57

You do realise you can work full time (albeit in a low paid job) pay a mortgage and receive UC right?

youalright · 09/04/2026 18:57

Itsmetheflamingo · 09/04/2026 18:56

These reform bots are everywhere today, UC entry is their latest hate diatribe.

I saw someone post earlier “reform- looking after our own. Apart from when they’re poor”

I do wonder what wll be next it was pip a few months ago now its uc im going to guess pensions next

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 18:57

Sonato · 09/04/2026 18:56

Thats not what shes saying and you know it.

My stepson and his wife work FT with two children, just above the UC threshold

They would have loved to take their little ones to any of the attractions listed but the costs were prohibitive.

They are no better off than people on UC being so close to the cliffedge, so reduced rates for some and not all really grate.

Its performative, its unjust, and it rightly makes those of us who pay into the system more than a bit pissed off.

Oh people in receipt of UC have never paid into the system?

It's un-fucking-believable we've reached a point where offering a discount to the poorest I'm our society is dubbed "performative and unjust"

ColinOfficeTrolley · 09/04/2026 18:58

Just get the sack, give any current savings to families on UC so they can have an even more luxurious life and stop paying your mortgage. Simple.

EineReiseDurchDieZeit · 09/04/2026 18:58

This thread has been done before

youalright · 09/04/2026 18:59

EineReiseDurchDieZeit · 09/04/2026 18:58

This thread has been done before

Its done every day

Penguinteachermom · 09/04/2026 18:59

First post nails it!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread