Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Irritated that families on UC get heavily discounted entry

1000 replies

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Sonato · 09/04/2026 18:59

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 18:57

Oh people in receipt of UC have never paid into the system?

It's un-fucking-believable we've reached a point where offering a discount to the poorest I'm our society is dubbed "performative and unjust"

It is both of those things.

Sirzy · 09/04/2026 18:59

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:45

The problem is most people claiming UC on this thread are expecting buckets of sympathy and woe is me but you are completely incapable of putting yourselves in the shoes of working families who receive nothing in hand outs, and are yet in exactly the same financial position as you are in at the end of the month. Oh but you get to go to these places at a discounted rate. Make it make sense. It needs to be fair.

It is fair, the uc system is there to help anyone who has an income which falls under the minimum deemed by the family circumstances.

due to having a disabled child I actually have no work requirement on my UC claim but I still work full time in a job I love and that fits around Ds pretty well. It’s also a job that has awful pay for the stress and expectations that come with it so yes I do need some UC top ups.

If people want to judge then let them!

Usernamechanging · 09/04/2026 18:59

Usernamechanging · 09/04/2026 18:57

Bollox. What utter bollox.

You can be on UC and:
Work
Own your own home
Pay for childcare
Pay full charges for utilities snd Council Tax
Not be in receipt of free school meals
Have the desire for your children to be educated through the medium of local heritage
Be middle class in every way possible other than income

I was a single parent of 3, one with a disability, and working full time as a teacher. Still got Tax Credits snd would have got UC had I been switched over before my youngest left school. I also tutored, marked A Level exams and ran a summer holiday club. In other words, wages in this country are shit and many of us are a) doing the best we can whilst b) claiming what the rules say we are entitled to.

So darling, do sod off with your middle class rhetoric that bears no resemblance to real life. Be grateful for what you have; not what you don't.

So sick and tired of deliberate misunderstanding of how many people live.

And I fucking paid into the system as well. Still paid NI. Still paid a pension.Still paid tax.

By contrast, Government never got a single penny out of my ex. And I'm the problem?!

Jesus fucking weeps. All the time.

EineReiseDurchDieZeit · 09/04/2026 18:59

It’s pure rage bait

FKAT · 09/04/2026 18:59

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:54

Are you ok? Have you banged your head?

Fine thanks love. I'm not the one who thinks the Labour government subsidises tickets to Kew Gardens for Universal Credit recipients.

Lucytheloose · 09/04/2026 19:00

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:07

Don’t have children if you can’t afford them?

I'd argue that anyone who begrudges a child a day out at the zoo is deficient in the milk of human kindness and should not be having children whether they can afford them or not.

RhododendronFlowers · 09/04/2026 19:00

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 18:57

Oh people in receipt of UC have never paid into the system?

It's un-fucking-believable we've reached a point where offering a discount to the poorest I'm our society is dubbed "performative and unjust"

Yep. Plus resenting children getting opportunities for days out.

RockLobsterRockLobster · 09/04/2026 19:00

Lucytheloose · 09/04/2026 19:00

I'd argue that anyone who begrudges a child a day out at the zoo is deficient in the milk of human kindness and should not be having children whether they can afford them or not.

Excellent response!

Allisnotlost1 · 09/04/2026 19:01

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:51

Like the unemployed can move into these professional jobs.

There are about 700k graduates currently unemployed. I get the feeling a good few of them could fill your job if you fancy vacating it for an easy life on UC.

usedtobeaylis · 09/04/2026 19:01

Go on UC then.

MerseyChick · 09/04/2026 19:01

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

I bet you own a pitchfork 🔱👩🏻‍🌾

AxolotlEars · 09/04/2026 19:01

We get UC and both work. Don't own a property. Don't think we could afford to go to them because of transport costs

Sonato · 09/04/2026 19:02

Lucytheloose · 09/04/2026 19:00

I'd argue that anyone who begrudges a child a day out at the zoo is deficient in the milk of human kindness and should not be having children whether they can afford them or not.

No one is begrudging a child a day at the zoo. That is a strawman argument.

What people begrudge is that two sets of parents can be in the same financial situation at the emd of the month, one on UC, one not - yet only one of those sets receives state help and subsidised prices at said zoo.

The other receives fuck all.

Thats what people begrudge.

usedtobeaylis · 09/04/2026 19:02

Lucytheloose · 09/04/2026 19:00

I'd argue that anyone who begrudges a child a day out at the zoo is deficient in the milk of human kindness and should not be having children whether they can afford them or not.

👏👏👏

Glendaruel · 09/04/2026 19:02

Because society is not a even playing field. If you are born in certain circumstances you are less likely to engage in cultural activities which impacts your educational and future development. By offering a discounted entry they are trying in a small way to break a cycle.

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 19:02

Sonato · 09/04/2026 18:59

It is both of those things.

Best clutch those pearls a wee bit harder then

Dweetfidilove · 09/04/2026 19:03

carnivalqueenthethird · 09/04/2026 18:56

That’s the point I’m making thought isn’t it? The ‘in between’ as you so eloquently put it, can’t access these businesses because we can’t afford to go!

Take that up with the companies offering the discounts. Not the person availing themselves of the discount - contributing to the companies coffers/paying the employees of said companies' wages.

We need to collectively demand better wages from employers and boycott these places that charge extortionate rates. Companies are busy getting away with exploiting us, all while we spend our energy fighting each other.

usedtobeaylis · 09/04/2026 19:03

Sonato · 09/04/2026 19:02

No one is begrudging a child a day at the zoo. That is a strawman argument.

What people begrudge is that two sets of parents can be in the same financial situation at the emd of the month, one on UC, one not - yet only one of those sets receives state help and subsidised prices at said zoo.

The other receives fuck all.

Thats what people begrudge.

People just freak the fuck out about someone getting something they don't, especially if it's someone worse off than they are. That's what it really is. People begrudge the less well off anything but blank walls and gruel and that the fucking truth.

Kitte321 · 09/04/2026 19:04

Merryoldgoat · 09/04/2026 18:52

I agree. Everyone on UC has loads of money. That’s why there are no food banks, no homeless families in temporary accommodation, no children on poverty etc.

You do realise most UC claimants are IN WORK don’t you? Our government is subsidising poverty-level wages. That’s what we should be angry about - not people who need it to live.

This isn’t true. Latest estimates show 30-35% of UC claimants are in work.

cadburyegg · 09/04/2026 19:04

Long before my exh and I broke up and I became eligible for UC, we carefully factored in planning our family because of childcare costs. My ds1 only became eligible for 15 funded hours when he turned 3. Nowadays children get funded hours from the age of 9 months. You don’t see people moaning about this “benefit” though. I think it’s great that this has improved, I’m not starting threads saying how unfair it is.

youalright · 09/04/2026 19:04

Sonato · 09/04/2026 19:02

No one is begrudging a child a day at the zoo. That is a strawman argument.

What people begrudge is that two sets of parents can be in the same financial situation at the emd of the month, one on UC, one not - yet only one of those sets receives state help and subsidised prices at said zoo.

The other receives fuck all.

Thats what people begrudge.

How much do you actually think uc is?

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 19:04

Imagine the horror when people on this thread realise that the rich get lots of things for free, just because they're rich

Carandache18 · 09/04/2026 19:04

Sonato · 09/04/2026 18:56

Thats not what shes saying and you know it.

My stepson and his wife work FT with two children, just above the UC threshold

They would have loved to take their little ones to any of the attractions listed but the costs were prohibitive.

They are no better off than people on UC being so close to the cliffedge, so reduced rates for some and not all really grate.

Its performative, its unjust, and it rightly makes those of us who pay into the system more than a bit pissed off.

I pay into the system. I always have. I had child benefit, but nothing else.
It doesn't make me fed up. It makes me very, very happy.

Also, I've taken kids to museums. It's flipping hard work. There won't be any scroungers in those queues. Just the usual achy feet and too many bags to carry of dedicated parents spending a day making things better and brighter for their kids.

Readytoescape · 09/04/2026 19:04

As someone who gets uc since my marriage ended I will say if the government made the non resident parent pay enough to support their children uc would be a lot less. I don’t know if this scheme is new but I had not heard about it until this week.

carnivalqueenthethird · 09/04/2026 19:05

PiMCA · 09/04/2026 18:36

Yes they will! I work for the DWP. You're only banned from claiming benefits for 3 months if you give up your job and as long as you don't spend your house money too quickly, they'll let you claim UC once it's down to 16k. Go for it!

We will make you apply for shitty jobs for 35 hours a week or sanction you btw. We are also highly unlikely to give you enough to cover your rent but we will send you a link to foodbanks when you realise that UC is fuck all money to live on!

@PiMCA i have a question as I’ve been scratching my head over it for a number of years now.

Re the house money when you sell your house. I know someone in her 50s who has never worked (capable just doesn’t). She inherited a lot of money £300k and used it to buy a house outright, before going straight back onto UC. How is this allowed please? Shouldn’t she have had to used that £300k to live until it was down to £16k?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.