Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School as child care

876 replies

Differentforgirls · 07/04/2026 18:45

From another thread.

A poster said that state schools are there for helping parents to work. Therefore teachers are childminders. Teachers!

I think schools are there to educate our children and, though the staff go above and beyond these days, that is their primary function.

AIBU?

OP posts:
HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 09/04/2026 17:15

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 17:11

You.

Seriously?
I have been perfectly polite. I’ve challenged you on some of your points but I’ve done it in a respectful way.

Please can you highlight where I’ve been rude or in anyway abusive to you?

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 09/04/2026 17:17

I’d also like to know what I’ve posted that makes me appear unwell as that’s quite a serious thing to say.

TasteOfOnion · 09/04/2026 17:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I think when people are losing an argument, accusing another poster of being mentally unwell is appalling. It happens a lot here.

Mental illness is a serious diagnosis. It should never be used as a flippant insult and is below the belt. I actually think it should be a reportable ‘offence’ on here. You are being disingenuous and are not remotely concerned about that person‘s mental health, you are just having a snide dig. I’m shocked that people behave like this, especially when they are older and would have presumed gained some maturity.

Oh and I work in mental health and have done for almost 30 years and there is nothing to suggest that that poster is mentally unwell. You owe them an apology.

rainbowsandraspberrygin · 09/04/2026 17:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I really don’t think that poster has done anything wrong and you seem to be targeting them unnecessarily.

you’re coming across as a not very nice person.

not everyone will agree with you. It feels like you started this thread to have an argument.

CarlaLemarchant · 09/04/2026 17:37

rainbowsandraspberrygin · 09/04/2026 17:35

I really don’t think that poster has done anything wrong and you seem to be targeting them unnecessarily.

you’re coming across as a not very nice person.

not everyone will agree with you. It feels like you started this thread to have an argument.

The fact that the OP started the thread to have an argument was very evident from the start.

Katemax82 · 09/04/2026 18:24

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 13:31

That’s a one off and what else could they do? Send them all to walk home themselves?

No it wasn't closed half way through the day...we had an email saying the school would be closed but they would remain partly open to provide childcare

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 18:51

Katemax82 · 09/04/2026 18:24

No it wasn't closed half way through the day...we had an email saying the school would be closed but they would remain partly open to provide childcare

👍😊

OP posts:
Jok77 · 09/04/2026 18:52

I am a primary school teacher. I am employed to teach, not baby sit. I've got a degree, a PGCE, plus various other qualifications as well. Yes we care for the children in our classes but we are far more than baby sitters and free child care!

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 18:53

Jok77 · 09/04/2026 18:52

I am a primary school teacher. I am employed to teach, not baby sit. I've got a degree, a PGCE, plus various other qualifications as well. Yes we care for the children in our classes but we are far more than baby sitters and free child care!

Agree!

OP posts:
VaccineSticker · 09/04/2026 18:57

takealettermsjones · 07/04/2026 18:52

Well yes they are there to educate, but they are also in loco parentis and have a duty of care. So they do carry out some of the duties a childminder would.

No schools are not free childminding service. School are there to educate because everyone should have the right to free education but not free childcare. That’s on your shoulders.

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 09/04/2026 18:57

Jok77 · 09/04/2026 18:52

I am a primary school teacher. I am employed to teach, not baby sit. I've got a degree, a PGCE, plus various other qualifications as well. Yes we care for the children in our classes but we are far more than baby sitters and free child care!

Nobody has said you are babysitters.
I’m university lecturer who teaches on Primary QTS programmes.
We never refer to you as babysitters.

Hopinghopeless · 09/04/2026 18:58

Jok77 · 09/04/2026 18:52

I am a primary school teacher. I am employed to teach, not baby sit. I've got a degree, a PGCE, plus various other qualifications as well. Yes we care for the children in our classes but we are far more than baby sitters and free child care!

Who cares for the children while you teach? Do you have childcare staff in your classroom while the children are there?

I really don't understand this upset over the word childcare. They are in your care while the are in your lesson. That's it. You literally cannot argue that so why the outrage?

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 18:58

VaccineSticker · 09/04/2026 18:57

No schools are not free childminding service. School are there to educate because everyone should have the right to free education but not free childcare. That’s on your shoulders.

Thank you.

OP posts:
EwwPeople · 09/04/2026 19:00

VaccineSticker · 09/04/2026 18:57

No schools are not free childminding service. School are there to educate because everyone should have the right to free education but not free childcare. That’s on your shoulders.

How would you stop people using schools as free childcare as well as free education, though?😬

VaccineSticker · 09/04/2026 19:01

Frieda86 · 09/04/2026 15:32

During Covid schools stayed open for the very purpose of providing childcare for key workers.

Those times were extreme, once in a century event where key workers had to be sacrificed to keep us fed and alive while the rest of us made videos on tik tok.

Emmz1510 · 09/04/2026 19:02

I imagine that people who say school has no role in helping people to work are middle to upper class people who can afford to have only one parent work. Either that or they are on benefits. Sorry/not sorry if that annoys folk.
Of course the primary purpose of school is to educate children. But only a naive fool would not be able to see that they also enable people to work. What are we supposed to do? Send our child to school yet sit at home perfectly capable of working just because ‘school is not childcare’. It’s like saying ‘your child is legally required to be there, we’ll fine you if they aren’t, but don’t rely on it, don’t do anything else that prevents you being available at all times. Better have a back up plan. Even though there is no alternative childcare provision for school age children. Hell mend you if you don’t have family available at a moments notice’.
Not agreeing that school is childcare is essentially saying you don’t agree with parents working. Oh no, sorry, you don’t agree with mothers working.

PloddingAlong21 · 09/04/2026 19:03

InfoSecInTheCity · 07/04/2026 19:24

Of course they are childcare, it’s right there in the word, they ‘Care for Children’. They educate and the primary purpose is to ensure a consistent level of education is made available to all children to an agreed curriculum, but during the school hours they care for the children they are entrusted with.

Having this provision and it being expected that the majority use it (homeschooling is considered the exception) means that the government is able to expect that people with school age children to work at least 16 hrs a week which can be achieved during school hours, often with difficulty but it is achievable.

i really can’t understand why the offended reaction at people think a place that’s caring for children can be considered childcare.

Agree with this. The primary goal is education yes, but over the years society and norms have shifted and so has the role of a school.
years ago a school could perhaps be considered more purely for teaching but as society has evolved they are far more involved (rightly so) in identifying care needs of abused children, knowing the children and caring about them beyond “do they know their times tables”. That is literally caring for the child and therefore child care.

I like teachers are more emotionally invested than purely an emotional institute given how much kids spend time there.

OP - do your teachers not care for your kids? If you’re a teacher, don’t you care for or about those in your class? The pedantic nature of viewing it as “childcare” is daft. Nurseries and child minders also have curriculums and goals/targets for developmental goals. Some may say these foundational years are more important to set them up to learn at school - that’s also childcare.

Also, yes provision exists to get the work force out working so we can all be taxed. Imagine if we didn’t have school and care provision - country would collapse.

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 19:08

PloddingAlong21 · 09/04/2026 19:03

Agree with this. The primary goal is education yes, but over the years society and norms have shifted and so has the role of a school.
years ago a school could perhaps be considered more purely for teaching but as society has evolved they are far more involved (rightly so) in identifying care needs of abused children, knowing the children and caring about them beyond “do they know their times tables”. That is literally caring for the child and therefore child care.

I like teachers are more emotionally invested than purely an emotional institute given how much kids spend time there.

OP - do your teachers not care for your kids? If you’re a teacher, don’t you care for or about those in your class? The pedantic nature of viewing it as “childcare” is daft. Nurseries and child minders also have curriculums and goals/targets for developmental goals. Some may say these foundational years are more important to set them up to learn at school - that’s also childcare.

Also, yes provision exists to get the work force out working so we can all be taxed. Imagine if we didn’t have school and care provision - country would collapse.

Edited

My whole problem with this thread is that people are taking my op personally, and not actually reading it properly.

OP posts:
takealettermsjones · 09/04/2026 19:12

VaccineSticker · 09/04/2026 18:57

No schools are not free childminding service. School are there to educate because everyone should have the right to free education but not free childcare. That’s on your shoulders.

  1. Please point out where I said schools are a free childminding service.
  1. Whether everyone should have the right to free childcare is another issue entirely.
  1. Wow, this thread has escalated 😅
Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 19:25

rainbowsandraspberrygin · 09/04/2026 17:35

I really don’t think that poster has done anything wrong and you seem to be targeting them unnecessarily.

you’re coming across as a not very nice person.

not everyone will agree with you. It feels like you started this thread to have an argument.

I knew I recognised your user name. You’re the person on the thread where a grandmother has been asked to cut her hours at work to look after her grandchildren while the parents won’t. You think that it’s ok to ask a woman to cut her hours while not asking the man. But, for some mad reason think that men have never actually parented and your generation can teach them. Stop following me about.

OP posts:
Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 19:33

VaccineSticker · 09/04/2026 18:57

No schools are not free childminding service. School are there to educate because everyone should have the right to free education but not free childcare. That’s on your shoulders.

Wish this was x and I could retweet this.

OP posts:
scottishGirl · 09/04/2026 19:37

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 10:03

He’s 63. Retired three years ago. Do you not get 32 days plus 10 public holidays?

No I don't. Perhaps those on older contracts might but I'm unsure of that. I'm significantly less.

PloddingAlong21 · 09/04/2026 19:38

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 19:08

My whole problem with this thread is that people are taking my op personally, and not actually reading it properly.

How? You’ve asked if you’re being unreasonable to say it isn’t childcare and is solely education. The general consensus is yes, it’s more than just education. Therefore yes YABU as per your original question.

I don’t think people are taking it personally, they’re simply, largely, not agreeing with you.

Having re-read your post - perhaps you need to provide more clarity if you feel it’s everyone else misunderstanding your op.

scottishGirl · 09/04/2026 19:42

Differentforgirls · 09/04/2026 10:07

I never worked from home! There are full time staff - 52 weeks in all secondaries. I was based in two throughout the years. Based. I didn’t work for the school itself, my work was authority wide. I had offices in both schools.

Well regardless, many people are not authorised to use their annual leave exclusively during school holidays when lots of people want time off or WFH. I'm not sure how you expect them to remain in their job when you appear to be so against any sort of childcare that isn't parents.

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 09/04/2026 19:46

PloddingAlong21 · 09/04/2026 19:38

How? You’ve asked if you’re being unreasonable to say it isn’t childcare and is solely education. The general consensus is yes, it’s more than just education. Therefore yes YABU as per your original question.

I don’t think people are taking it personally, they’re simply, largely, not agreeing with you.

Having re-read your post - perhaps you need to provide more clarity if you feel it’s everyone else misunderstanding your op.

I agree. I don’t think anyone has taken the original post personally.
The direct digs and insults from the OP have been unwarranted and quite personal at times but I can’t see how disagreeing with OP means you’ve taken it personally?! The whole nature of this forum is to generate discussion. If you can’t cope with that I’d suggest not starting a thread in the first place!