Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To find the growing narrative of over diagnosis (autism, adhd and mental health) upsetting and draining

1000 replies

Frazzlesforever · 06/04/2026 08:13

There seems to be a drip drip of press headlines and change in the conversation that too many people are getting diagnosed. And that some parents are being too pushy to get extra help or trying to get be benefits etc.

As the parent of a high masking autistic girl I had to push for diagnosis although the school just saw a highly compliant, quiet anxious child. My daughter is now extremely mentally unwell through not coping in school, has had to drop out of school missing her gcses, emergency CAMHs involvement - devastating for her and us.

She is exactly the type of child who would fall under the radar. Just an anxious child with over anxious parents. Apparently seeming to cope until she just couldn't. Surely if anything we need better understanding and support for these types of children not less. Otherwise we also risk kicking the problem down the road To severe problems in adulthood. - poor mental health/outcomes etc.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
TigerRag · 07/04/2026 13:12

Pixelaitedo · 07/04/2026 13:09

There does seem to be some actual overdiagnosis.

when my eldest started reception 9 years ago there were kids who stood out as different and they have all gone on much later to get diagnosed. What makes less sense is the kids who at no point have had any issues related to asd who have then got diagnosed. Those are thr completely standard average kids. Some have dyslexia so seem to have spiraled after the dyslexia diagnosis.

Generally i would prioritise the younger adults as some of them were referred ages ago but never reached top of paeds list.

NHS arent great at diagnosing anything so why would ND be any different?

Personally i think a more evidence approach to both asd and adhd would be better.
So school reports that say x struggles to work in a team. Y scoring low on concentration. Logs of issues with clubs.
I had a spreadsheet of issues from nursery age upwards. Every year. Adhd is crazily based on just teacher rating the students, our teacher ignored the issues we had said about and admitted they couldnt answer some questions.

I assume some of the increase in referrals is
People wanting RAP passes for theme parks
DLA
Exam adjustments
Some adjustments in classroom
The deterioration of general child behaviour and more relaxed parenting with other kids being impacted
Dyslexia isnt being diagnosed by schools
Increased academics pushed on 4 year olds
Increased intervention by parents in kids friendships

I mean all of these areas are things uk is getting wrong. Huge queues for rides. Exams are way too short even if you work fast. Why does a 4 year old need to write?
Kids are not making or maintaining friendships themselves. Parents are manipulating them. And even clubs like scouts they ensure the kids already has friends there so dont need to make new friends. 'oh is anyones kids doing xyz?' Moving to secondary the kids are put with at least one mate. Even the teachers- oh x is too close to y we must separate them. And teachers completely controlling seating plans!

Its not really a surprise seemimgly quiet kids are not enjoying school, they are just not complaining. They are being intentionally sat away from friends and with the louder kids.

Lets put a target on for kids being potty trained by 3 again which will help identify kids who do struggle.

I think kids comong into school so lacki g skills can only be nursery. My eldest they spent time doing phonics etc but little time doing any learning about social things it was free play. My youngest the nursery did no learning (fine) but no real prep for school still socially about compromise etc.
I would say my eldest would nowadays have been ID as audhd at a good nursery.

Their friend was similar but was referred at reception but fobbed off by peaditrician but later diagnosed.

Im not convinced the dsm requirements of it starting from a young age are being adhered to nor the having impact on life.
i do think adults just wanting a diagnosis for the sake of it are perhaps a li ttle selfish - it costs 2k to the nhs for each would you pay that yourself? As several parents i know who are well off wont pay.

You cant get a diagnosis for the sake of it. You have to demonstrate that you're impacted by it

I don't think I've met anyone who received a diagnosis for shits and giggles. They were struggling

Robotindisguise · 07/04/2026 13:22

Needspaceforlego · 06/04/2026 08:53

If those figures are right, why are schools saying 20% of kids have SEN?

Something just isn't adding up.

Ok the 20% must include other disabilities but we also know there is an overlap between ADHD and ASD. So some people must appear in both the 2% and the 5% but that still makes me ask who are the other 13%

What are schools doing that so many kids aren't coping?

What are schools doing that so many kids aren't coping?

That is the correct question.

See the I hate Michael Gove thread in active convos for further details.

Also - one in ten kids is dyslexic. There’s 10% right there. If you assume autism and ADHD (separately and combined) are another 5%, that only leaves 5% for all other disabilities in mainstream, including hearing impairment, language delay, dyspraxia, dyscalculia, physical disability etc.

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 13:27

Pixelaitedo · 07/04/2026 13:09

There does seem to be some actual overdiagnosis.

when my eldest started reception 9 years ago there were kids who stood out as different and they have all gone on much later to get diagnosed. What makes less sense is the kids who at no point have had any issues related to asd who have then got diagnosed. Those are thr completely standard average kids. Some have dyslexia so seem to have spiraled after the dyslexia diagnosis.

Generally i would prioritise the younger adults as some of them were referred ages ago but never reached top of paeds list.

NHS arent great at diagnosing anything so why would ND be any different?

Personally i think a more evidence approach to both asd and adhd would be better.
So school reports that say x struggles to work in a team. Y scoring low on concentration. Logs of issues with clubs.
I had a spreadsheet of issues from nursery age upwards. Every year. Adhd is crazily based on just teacher rating the students, our teacher ignored the issues we had said about and admitted they couldnt answer some questions.

I assume some of the increase in referrals is
People wanting RAP passes for theme parks
DLA
Exam adjustments
Some adjustments in classroom
The deterioration of general child behaviour and more relaxed parenting with other kids being impacted
Dyslexia isnt being diagnosed by schools
Increased academics pushed on 4 year olds
Increased intervention by parents in kids friendships

I mean all of these areas are things uk is getting wrong. Huge queues for rides. Exams are way too short even if you work fast. Why does a 4 year old need to write?
Kids are not making or maintaining friendships themselves. Parents are manipulating them. And even clubs like scouts they ensure the kids already has friends there so dont need to make new friends. 'oh is anyones kids doing xyz?' Moving to secondary the kids are put with at least one mate. Even the teachers- oh x is too close to y we must separate them. And teachers completely controlling seating plans!

Its not really a surprise seemimgly quiet kids are not enjoying school, they are just not complaining. They are being intentionally sat away from friends and with the louder kids.

Lets put a target on for kids being potty trained by 3 again which will help identify kids who do struggle.

I think kids comong into school so lacki g skills can only be nursery. My eldest they spent time doing phonics etc but little time doing any learning about social things it was free play. My youngest the nursery did no learning (fine) but no real prep for school still socially about compromise etc.
I would say my eldest would nowadays have been ID as audhd at a good nursery.

Their friend was similar but was referred at reception but fobbed off by peaditrician but later diagnosed.

Im not convinced the dsm requirements of it starting from a young age are being adhered to nor the having impact on life.
i do think adults just wanting a diagnosis for the sake of it are perhaps a li ttle selfish - it costs 2k to the nhs for each would you pay that yourself? As several parents i know who are well off wont pay.

DLA/PIP are based on needs, not diagnosis. You don’t need a diagnosis to receive DLA/PIP. Not all with a diagnosis will meet the eligibility criteria.

A diagnosis doesn’t automatically result in exam access arrangements. Conversely, a diagnosis isn’t required for EAA.

A diagnosis doesn’t automatically result in more support at school. And a diagnosis isn’t required for schools to provide SEN support or for an EHCP.

A diagnosis doesn’t automatically qualify someone for a RAP. And you can meet the eligibility criteria without a diagnosis.

Nmss · 07/04/2026 13:30

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 13:08

Such sessions don’t work for all with what would have previously been described as high-functioning autism either. DS3 has what would have been described as high-functioning autism. Note, not Asperger Syndrome because, although his IQ is above 70, he had a speech delay as a young child (still has a delay and significantly disordered language). He may not have what some are now describing as profound autism because he doesn’t have a co-morbid learning disability, but he has complex needs as per correspondence from every professional, and there are many, he sees. Reports/letters describe him as being profoundly disabled. He will never be independent and needs support with all ADL. He has EOTIS with 2:1 support at all because his needs are so complex it is inappropriate for provision to be made in a school. He has social care support. SEN sessions don’t work for him. There’s no short breaks provision that can meet his needs here.

I also have a DS who doesn’t have ASD or ADHD but has diagnoses that meet the wider definition of ND. He has even more complex needs than DS3, despite not having a learning disability. To the point he is eligible for continue care funding and has a large care package. He displays challenging behaviour and self injurious behaviour. It isn’t behavioural. Not one professional involved has ever said it is. It is because of his disability. SEN session, or any sessions, don’t work for him either.

I was answering a question about why parents of children like mine may behave a certain way. I can't speak for all but I can hazard a guess, i'm not sure what point you are trying to make other than your son has complex needs with autism and no ld as many do. That isn't profound autism. I was trying to answer a question as a parent ofsomeone who has the old diagnosis of autism/ new profound diagnosis.

You wrote that he displays challenging behaviour but that it isn't behavioural it's because of his diagnosis. Many kids with autism have challenging behaviour, my son does because of his autism too (certain repetitive behaviours, eloping, squeezing too tightly are some, there are others). He's also 2:1 etc

I'm genuinely not sure of your point. Do you mean that he understands his behaviour (no ld) but can't help himself/ control himself? I'm not sure what that has to do with parents of profound kids being rude to parents of other kids that aren't?

GreyGreyGrey · 07/04/2026 13:38

I have a DD diagnosed with dyslexia at 14 years old. It didn’t show up until she was older and the volume of reading and writing increased. Turns out that she is a very slow processor.

The diagnosis changed her life. She had become depressed and had ideations of self harm, after being a very sunny child. With the diagnosis, she had a self understanding and 25% extra time in exams which really helped. Her anxiety went away.

She went on to study Maths, Further Maths, Physics and Chemistry. She got 4 A*s and is studying STEM at Oxbridge and is pulling a first. Not only is she happy, but she should end up being useful to society.

I can understand that some people would think the extra time unfair. I would be very happy for everyone to have 25% extra time to reduce the time pressure. Not everyone will have a diagnosis, and all brains work differently. I don’t believe being a slow but deep thinker will hurt DD in the workplace. I don’t believe that she will need any accommodations.

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 13:43

Nmss · 07/04/2026 13:30

I was answering a question about why parents of children like mine may behave a certain way. I can't speak for all but I can hazard a guess, i'm not sure what point you are trying to make other than your son has complex needs with autism and no ld as many do. That isn't profound autism. I was trying to answer a question as a parent ofsomeone who has the old diagnosis of autism/ new profound diagnosis.

You wrote that he displays challenging behaviour but that it isn't behavioural it's because of his diagnosis. Many kids with autism have challenging behaviour, my son does because of his autism too (certain repetitive behaviours, eloping, squeezing too tightly are some, there are others). He's also 2:1 etc

I'm genuinely not sure of your point. Do you mean that he understands his behaviour (no ld) but can't help himself/ control himself? I'm not sure what that has to do with parents of profound kids being rude to parents of other kids that aren't?

The point I was making in my first paragraph was that SEN sessions “eg relaxed performances at a theatre or special autism clubs (think short breaks)” aren’t necessarily “geared towards” those perceived as “more able” rather than those with what some are now calling “profound autism”. I was pointing out such sessions don’t work for many even those you think they are geared towards.

I didn’t say DS3 did have profound autism. Quite the opposite since I said “has what would have been described as high-functioning autism. Note, not Asperger Syndrome because, although his IQ is above 70…”

My second paragraph was in reply to you saying “isn't that behavioural” to another poster. I was pointing out just because someone doesn’t have an LD doesn’t mean their challenging behaviour, including violence towards others, is behavioural.

No, my DS1 doesn’t understand his behaviour. Not at all.

I wasn’t commenting on any rudeness. Although, I see equal amounts of rudeness from both ‘camps’.

Nmss · 07/04/2026 14:01

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 13:43

The point I was making in my first paragraph was that SEN sessions “eg relaxed performances at a theatre or special autism clubs (think short breaks)” aren’t necessarily “geared towards” those perceived as “more able” rather than those with what some are now calling “profound autism”. I was pointing out such sessions don’t work for many even those you think they are geared towards.

I didn’t say DS3 did have profound autism. Quite the opposite since I said “has what would have been described as high-functioning autism. Note, not Asperger Syndrome because, although his IQ is above 70…”

My second paragraph was in reply to you saying “isn't that behavioural” to another poster. I was pointing out just because someone doesn’t have an LD doesn’t mean their challenging behaviour, including violence towards others, is behavioural.

No, my DS1 doesn’t understand his behaviour. Not at all.

I wasn’t commenting on any rudeness. Although, I see equal amounts of rudeness from both ‘camps’.

A poster asked me directly why they had witnessed parents of kids like mine being rude to parents of kids like theirs and said we should all be in it together to help everyone.

I was trying to explain why that may happen and why many parents of more severely kids may behave like that. It wasn't a generalisation, it was a direct question that I answered from experience. Many kids/ people with autism can access short breaks/ relaxed sessions, thats why they are there. Do you really believe that when they commission them and advertise them as autism friendly etc it's with peoplelike my son in mind?

For a person with no ld to behave violently (if that is what you are refering too given in the instance about behaviour i was replying to someone who said her kid has pushed her down the stairs and thrown a plate across the room with no ld) there has to be some behaviour to it. In the absense of ld they should be able to learn that type of behaviour is wrong. Repetitive movements are part of autism, they can be addressed especially with no ld. Pushing someone down the stairs isn't a repetitive movement. Autism shouldnt be used to not address any other underlying issues even if they are related in some way eg sensory

Challenging behaviour without ld is behaviour. Its behaviour with ld, its in the name. Surely without learning disability/ low iq they can understand the impact of such behaviours?

*Ld referring to learning disability not learning difficulties.

Nmss · 07/04/2026 14:03

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 13:43

The point I was making in my first paragraph was that SEN sessions “eg relaxed performances at a theatre or special autism clubs (think short breaks)” aren’t necessarily “geared towards” those perceived as “more able” rather than those with what some are now calling “profound autism”. I was pointing out such sessions don’t work for many even those you think they are geared towards.

I didn’t say DS3 did have profound autism. Quite the opposite since I said “has what would have been described as high-functioning autism. Note, not Asperger Syndrome because, although his IQ is above 70…”

My second paragraph was in reply to you saying “isn't that behavioural” to another poster. I was pointing out just because someone doesn’t have an LD doesn’t mean their challenging behaviour, including violence towards others, is behavioural.

No, my DS1 doesn’t understand his behaviour. Not at all.

I wasn’t commenting on any rudeness. Although, I see equal amounts of rudeness from both ‘camps’.

If he doesnt have a learning disability which includes social aspects and activities of daily living why doesnt he undetstand his behaviour? Genuine question.

Whatafustercluck · 07/04/2026 14:12

Kiminki · 07/04/2026 11:44

A state that cannot alter is not ‘profound’; I do not have profound vision problems despite my short-sightedness being permanent. Even without my glasses it would be disabling but still not profound.

My response is clearly directed to a specific poster whose child's impairment is most definitely profound, in both the severity and all-day-every-day sense.

Nmss · 07/04/2026 14:15

@ChasingMoreSleep i'm doing this n trying to multiple other things at the same time. Just putting it out there, from what youve wrote about your ds i'd look at learning disability. Activities of daily living etc. Especially if he doesn't understand his own behaviours. It isn't just about being academic.

Wellthisisdifficult · 07/04/2026 14:19

I’m 50. On the surface I have a successful career, a family. But life has been fucking hard. I’ve had to work 10times harder than NT to even appear to stand still, constant inability to fit in, decades of suicide ideation and othe MH issues therapy couldn’t touch. Having a dual asd/adhd diagnosis has helped me immeasurably esp sine Peri completely fucked up my coping mechanisms.so yes the person you describe can absolutely benefit. It has given me peace that I have a biological condition that’s made life so so hard and terrible - looking “normal” has come at a terrible cost to me.

imagine living your life thinking the rest of the world doesn’t make sense and the amount of effort navigating that - imagine how much energy that takes.

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 14:22

@Nmss DS1 doesn’t have a learning disability because his IQ is over 70. However, he has a whole range of complex physical, medical, psychological and developmental conditions that mean he is incapable of understanding. He can’t put his IQ into practice in real life. For example, he gets PIP now but when he got DLA he met the criteria for SMI because although he has a higher IQ, he can’t put it into practice in real life so still met the “severe impairment of intelligence and social functioning” part of the test. He needs care with all ADL.

I know what you said. I read your posts. I was replying to what you said.

Many kids/ people with autism can access short breaks/ relaxed sessions, thats why they are there. Do you really believe that when they commission them and advertise them as autism friendly etc it's with peoplelike my son in mind?

And many can’t. I didn’t say such sessions were aimed at your son. I was pointing out they weren’t aimed at mine either.

For a person with no ld to behave violently (if that is what you are refering too given in the instance about behaviour i was replying to someone who said her kid has pushed her down the stairs and thrown a plate across the room with no ld) there has to be some behaviour to it.

Wrong. Utterly wrong. DS1 has dozens of professionals involved in his care, none of them think it is behavioural in any way.

In the absense of ld they should be able to learn that type of behaviour is wrong.
Surely without learning disability/ low iq they can understand the impact of such behaviours?

No. Not all can even if they don’t have an LD. DS1 can’t. Everyone involved is of the opinion it isn’t a matter of him being able to learn/understand it is wrong/not to do those things.

Repetitive movements are part of autism, they can be addressed especially with no ld.

As I said, DS1 doesn’t have ASD or ADHD. He does have other complex needs, some of which come under the wider ND umbrella. He also repetitive movements. His can’t be addressed in the sense of stopping them. No-one thinks they can be. They can be reduced to some extent by meeting his needs but they will always happen.

Pushing someone down the stairs isn't a repetitive movement.

I didn’t say it was.

Kiminki · 07/04/2026 14:36

I’ve had to work 10times harder than NT to even appear to stand still

I think this is an issue in both directions - the idea that other groups always have things easier. I think it is a reason why some people are resentful of those getting diagnosed - because with a diagnosis they have a reason for their difficulties whereas those without don’t. Sort of like a diagnosis letting people off the hook. Equally calling everyone without ASD/ADHD ‘neurotypical’ ignores the many conditions they might struggle with - to the extent that it is actually ableist. Yes some people appear to swim through life with little effort but we don’t know what is really going on in their lives. It reminds me of various autism advocates loathing for ‘autism moms’ except we now realise those mums are also invariably autistic too.

Nmss · 07/04/2026 14:36

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 14:22

@Nmss DS1 doesn’t have a learning disability because his IQ is over 70. However, he has a whole range of complex physical, medical, psychological and developmental conditions that mean he is incapable of understanding. He can’t put his IQ into practice in real life. For example, he gets PIP now but when he got DLA he met the criteria for SMI because although he has a higher IQ, he can’t put it into practice in real life so still met the “severe impairment of intelligence and social functioning” part of the test. He needs care with all ADL.

I know what you said. I read your posts. I was replying to what you said.

Many kids/ people with autism can access short breaks/ relaxed sessions, thats why they are there. Do you really believe that when they commission them and advertise them as autism friendly etc it's with peoplelike my son in mind?

And many can’t. I didn’t say such sessions were aimed at your son. I was pointing out they weren’t aimed at mine either.

For a person with no ld to behave violently (if that is what you are refering too given in the instance about behaviour i was replying to someone who said her kid has pushed her down the stairs and thrown a plate across the room with no ld) there has to be some behaviour to it.

Wrong. Utterly wrong. DS1 has dozens of professionals involved in his care, none of them think it is behavioural in any way.

In the absense of ld they should be able to learn that type of behaviour is wrong.
Surely without learning disability/ low iq they can understand the impact of such behaviours?

No. Not all can even if they don’t have an LD. DS1 can’t. Everyone involved is of the opinion it isn’t a matter of him being able to learn/understand it is wrong/not to do those things.

Repetitive movements are part of autism, they can be addressed especially with no ld.

As I said, DS1 doesn’t have ASD or ADHD. He does have other complex needs, some of which come under the wider ND umbrella. He also repetitive movements. His can’t be addressed in the sense of stopping them. No-one thinks they can be. They can be reduced to some extent by meeting his needs but they will always happen.

Pushing someone down the stairs isn't a repetitive movement.

I didn’t say it was.

I'm just at a loss as to why you'd wade in then replying to a post that was an answer to a direct question about parents of kids with autism when you're not a parent of a kid with autism?!

Also discussing regarding autism with/ without ld and behaviours if your child doesn't have autism?

I'm not going to go against professionals you have involved but if you're saying he doesn't have usable iq, requires all that support and doesn't understand. Im curious about it. Ld isn't just diagnosed on iq alone at least my ds' wasn't. Which is why i'm curious.

If you wanted to discuss your children you could have just posted rather than shoehorning them into a question directly relating to autism that I answeed when they dont have autism. If it was to start an argument with me, i'm at a bit of a loss as our kids don't have the same diagnosis and i'm not sure what your point is other than your childs different diagnosis or saying challenging behaviour isn't behaviour.

Nmss · 07/04/2026 14:38

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 14:22

@Nmss DS1 doesn’t have a learning disability because his IQ is over 70. However, he has a whole range of complex physical, medical, psychological and developmental conditions that mean he is incapable of understanding. He can’t put his IQ into practice in real life. For example, he gets PIP now but when he got DLA he met the criteria for SMI because although he has a higher IQ, he can’t put it into practice in real life so still met the “severe impairment of intelligence and social functioning” part of the test. He needs care with all ADL.

I know what you said. I read your posts. I was replying to what you said.

Many kids/ people with autism can access short breaks/ relaxed sessions, thats why they are there. Do you really believe that when they commission them and advertise them as autism friendly etc it's with peoplelike my son in mind?

And many can’t. I didn’t say such sessions were aimed at your son. I was pointing out they weren’t aimed at mine either.

For a person with no ld to behave violently (if that is what you are refering too given in the instance about behaviour i was replying to someone who said her kid has pushed her down the stairs and thrown a plate across the room with no ld) there has to be some behaviour to it.

Wrong. Utterly wrong. DS1 has dozens of professionals involved in his care, none of them think it is behavioural in any way.

In the absense of ld they should be able to learn that type of behaviour is wrong.
Surely without learning disability/ low iq they can understand the impact of such behaviours?

No. Not all can even if they don’t have an LD. DS1 can’t. Everyone involved is of the opinion it isn’t a matter of him being able to learn/understand it is wrong/not to do those things.

Repetitive movements are part of autism, they can be addressed especially with no ld.

As I said, DS1 doesn’t have ASD or ADHD. He does have other complex needs, some of which come under the wider ND umbrella. He also repetitive movements. His can’t be addressed in the sense of stopping them. No-one thinks they can be. They can be reduced to some extent by meeting his needs but they will always happen.

Pushing someone down the stairs isn't a repetitive movement.

I didn’t say it was.

In regards to the pushing someone down the stairs, that was the behaviour that was originally discussed which i had said was behavioural not autism.

Cyclingmummy1 · 07/04/2026 14:43

T0mat0andch33s3 · 07/04/2026 06:30

Responsibility for what?
What strategies?
Parents asking who?

Their children.

Early help or family support, classes, parenting strategies, how to set boundaries, use of SM and technology, etc.

Schools.

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 14:47

@Nmss I am a parent of DC with ASD. Try reading my posts. DS1 doesn’t have ASD, but I have other DC who do, including DS3 who was the DC I was discussing in relation to the SEN groups, relaxed performances, short breaks.

In England, most LD services will now dx LD if IQ is higher than 70 even if the person cannot put that into practice.

I didn’t shoehorn my DC into anything. I was responding to aspects of your post. That is how a forum works.

T0mat0andch33s3 · 07/04/2026 14:47

Cyclingmummy1 · 07/04/2026 14:43

Their children.

Early help or family support, classes, parenting strategies, how to set boundaries, use of SM and technology, etc.

Schools.

None of those things erase autism and the huge parenting difficulties and behaviours it brings.

BlueandWhitePorcelain · 07/04/2026 14:49

Nmss · 07/04/2026 13:04

Yes, but they need recognition and treatment rather than just being left as happens to many with autism. See the earlier posters experience.

People with autism shouldn't be left to suffer with their mh needs because they have autism. Recognising how they present so eg has autism but also self harms or has autism but suffers with ocd or has autism and ED(b) etc can only be of benefit. It means services can see what provision is required and hopefully research can happen and better support developed. It also stops services from saying it is just part of their autism diagnosis and should get support via that which in reality means no support/ help.

Not everyone with autism has the same co occurring conditions, being able to use language to discuss them helps everyone. There is no issue when it comes to hypermobility or dyspraxia etc but there is still stigma with mh. There shouldn't be, it helps nobody.

Unfortunately, what I have seen here, is that the mental health trust diagnoses ND; but it’s quite clear when it comes to delivering non drug treatments, the therapists, clinicians, etc can’t adjust their approach for ND patients! Even if the intention is there to give treatment to ND patients, it doesn’t happen in reality!

For instance, DD’s therapist just couldn’t understand that she takes language literally; she can’t see the higher intent behind it; and the therapist complained about DD’s black and white thinking!

When I complained to the carers group about this, they said they’d heard it many times!

Cyclingmummy1 · 07/04/2026 14:51

Givemeachaitealatte · 07/04/2026 01:38

What suggestions are they then? And who are they being made by? I researched and went to parenting classes, overhauled my life to be the best parent I could and guess what? My child still had significant needs. Could I get anyone to listen to me or even make any suggestions of what I might do to help? Absolutely not. Am I still fighting a system just to have my child barely survive in it? Yep.

At that stage support should be available. But there are blockages caused by parents who want something to be wrong rather than look at their part.

I completely understand why Joanna Public finds it hard to believe people are trying to milk/game the system. But they are. Parents come to schools armed with all the buzz words and a friend who is an expert. 6 parents at my last parents evening wanted to know if their child had x,y or z. That's on top of the 6 who do. Not one of those new 6 want to take any of the self help ideas offered, they want me to say something is wrong. That is what you're are up against and why you are having to fight so hard. You have my sympathy; my school is fighting as hard as you are for those children with need.

T0mat0andch33s3 · 07/04/2026 14:57

Cyclingmummy1 · 07/04/2026 14:51

At that stage support should be available. But there are blockages caused by parents who want something to be wrong rather than look at their part.

I completely understand why Joanna Public finds it hard to believe people are trying to milk/game the system. But they are. Parents come to schools armed with all the buzz words and a friend who is an expert. 6 parents at my last parents evening wanted to know if their child had x,y or z. That's on top of the 6 who do. Not one of those new 6 want to take any of the self help ideas offered, they want me to say something is wrong. That is what you're are up against and why you are having to fight so hard. You have my sympathy; my school is fighting as hard as you are for those children with need.

Those parents aren’t blocking anything to other parents and maybe just maybe they know their kids better than you who thinks you parent your way out of autism- you can’t. Early Help did absolutely zilch towards my kids autism aside from fund therapy for me. Years of family therapy did nothing.

What did help was the right autism awareness treatment that we had to battle for whilst being ignored and dismissed by people like yourself who are hugely ill informed as to what parenting and supporting a child with autism is like .

Nmss · 07/04/2026 15:00

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 14:47

@Nmss I am a parent of DC with ASD. Try reading my posts. DS1 doesn’t have ASD, but I have other DC who do, including DS3 who was the DC I was discussing in relation to the SEN groups, relaxed performances, short breaks.

In England, most LD services will now dx LD if IQ is higher than 70 even if the person cannot put that into practice.

I didn’t shoehorn my DC into anything. I was responding to aspects of your post. That is how a forum works.

Now i'm really at a loss all tge conversations you ref'd were in direct regards to autism so not sure why DS1 was relevant at all to any points if he doesn't have autism?! This is where i'm ref to shoehorning. Replying on a forum is usually about context and relvance.

I'm interested in this thread and i'm guessing from my posts you know why i'm busy. I'm not interested in being goaded into an argument especially in regards to me answering that question about parents in ernest.

I'm sorry that your other ds can't access autism short breaks too, it's pretty crap, isn't it?!

teaandtoastwouldbenice · 07/04/2026 15:14

Those who have an actual need are being tarnished by the growing number of parents who seek a diagnosis for benefit/housing reasons.

As a social worker, I hand on heart cannot recall working with a single family in at least the last five years, who doesn’t have a child with a diagnosis or wanting their child to have a diagnosis and it is always referenced in benefit and bedroom needs, alongside other benefit boosters (being a ‘carer’ fibromyalgia etc)

Benefit fraud is basically the norm for many, social services and other agencies turn a blind eye because the level of need and the impact on the families income and consequent care of their children would be considerable.

Severe and obvious trauma in children and (very) poor parenting is seemingly overlooked on a shockingly high basis when it comes to symptoms that mirror or perhaps co-exist with neurodivergence and diagnosis’ are given out of context of children’s home environments.

ChasingMoreSleep · 07/04/2026 15:23

Nmss · 07/04/2026 15:00

Now i'm really at a loss all tge conversations you ref'd were in direct regards to autism so not sure why DS1 was relevant at all to any points if he doesn't have autism?! This is where i'm ref to shoehorning. Replying on a forum is usually about context and relvance.

I'm interested in this thread and i'm guessing from my posts you know why i'm busy. I'm not interested in being goaded into an argument especially in regards to me answering that question about parents in ernest.

I'm sorry that your other ds can't access autism short breaks too, it's pretty crap, isn't it?!

If you read my posts, you will see why I originally mentioned DS1. As I explained, the second paragraph of my original post (the one mentioning DS1) was about pointing that just because someone doesn’t have an LD doesn’t mean their challenging behaviour, including violence towards others, is behavioural. That applies to those with and without ASD. Hence mentioning DS1. My mentioning him since has been in reply to your posts. That isn’t shoehorning.

I am not goading and have not goaded you into an argument.

Yes, it is poor not all are catered for. Although DS3 has a large EOTIS package and social care support so not being able to access short breaks isn’t an issue for us. DS2, also autistic, can’t access them either and has social care support instead.

My pp should have said “In England, most LD services will not dx LD if IQ is higher than 70 even if the person cannot put that into practice.” Not ‘now’. Sorry. Completely changed the meaning of my post.

Nmss · 07/04/2026 15:27

BlueandWhitePorcelain · 07/04/2026 14:49

Unfortunately, what I have seen here, is that the mental health trust diagnoses ND; but it’s quite clear when it comes to delivering non drug treatments, the therapists, clinicians, etc can’t adjust their approach for ND patients! Even if the intention is there to give treatment to ND patients, it doesn’t happen in reality!

For instance, DD’s therapist just couldn’t understand that she takes language literally; she can’t see the higher intent behind it; and the therapist complained about DD’s black and white thinking!

When I complained to the carers group about this, they said they’d heard it many times!

I know and i agree it shouldn't happen. We need better diagnoses of mh and def more support. I could also do with the lottery numbers and i think i have more chance of getting those. It is all cost saving, too many needing help and support and not enough provision and funding.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.