Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To think Labour is not the party of the working people.

719 replies

pinkpalmleaves · 24/03/2026 17:57

I voted for Labour as I believed their election pledge of being a party for the working people but genuinely I can’t think of one thing, since they’ve been in power, that they’ve done to help me (a single working mother on around £42k a year)! I get zero help from UC, these mystical breakfast clubs don’t exist, people aren’t employing people due to their ridiculous NI implications, they aren’t building affordable housing, energy prices are insanely high and all they talk about is grants (which won’t affect me as I live in a flat)! Genuinely I can’t think of one thing that they’ve done to help working people in the middle. Why are Labour sticking their heads in the sand? Why do they refuse to help the squeezed working class? They are stopping this economy from thriving - as
nobody can afford to spend anything extra (treats, holidays, meals out etc etc)!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
PandoraSocks · 24/03/2026 19:21

Pineneedlesincarpet · 24/03/2026 19:15

How did Boris do it in 2019. She needs to get the Red Wall back. And actually the historic Conservative vote. Immigration is the key.

Reform and the Conservatives will hopefully do a pact eventually for the good of the country.

Edited

We all know why the Red Wall turned blue in 2019. Brexit. But why didn't the Tories hang on to it in 2024 if immigration was the key? Why didn't the Red Wall become the Reform wall?

I think at the time the polls were showing that immigration was not the No.1 issue.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 19:22

Then the parents need to WORK. Take different shifts and overtime if needed.

But the majority of people on benefits do work. Housing costs and wage stagnation are a big reason for increased costs.

Bist · 24/03/2026 19:23

Suzysinkingship · 24/03/2026 19:02

And you're falling for their tricks. Politicians love doing this. Are you absolutely sure all the problems in this country affecting working class people are caused by folk on benefits?

The cons like to make out labour are a party supporting benefits claimants yet it's their UC PIP systems that have seen claims balloon in size and it not because people have got better at working the system it's by design.

Do you think the private companies who lobby the government have any interest in employing those people because I can tell you that they don't and while you're happily distracted as they focus your anger at benefits claimants the politicians can happily get away with anything.

Politics across the Western world are completely broken due to many reasons the foremost being to refusal to acknowledge that China has progressed far more than they want to believe and has always been an historical powerhouse for thousands of years apart from a 100-200 year blip and own most of the debt we owe.

The entire West needs radical change but it's not going to come from parties like Reform/Restore or the Greens and that change will be painful for everyone including those on benefits and the working class however such change is unlikely to happen.

But you’ll agree that the welfare state is booming at a staggering rate and needs to be addressed, surely?

hattie43 · 24/03/2026 19:23

I think only tax payers should have a vote .

BIossomtoes · 24/03/2026 19:24

RichardTice · 24/03/2026 19:18

Economists should calculate it. It's what needs to be done unfortunately. It's a way we can tackle it. Tough decisions and all that.

In other words you haven’t got a clue. Fair enough.

MidnightMeltdown · 24/03/2026 19:24

Suzysinkingship · 24/03/2026 19:15

I totally get your anger and feel it too but I've got the point where I've realized that none of the political parties especially Labour and the Cons have any interest beyond their own self gain.

Labour spent years castigating the Cons for their disability benefit reforms/cuts only to pretty much copy and paste their ideas. The big political trick is to get folk like us to feel like our taxes wages are being directly handed to the local druggies to get us enraged so we are distracted while they do absolutely nothing to improve the country.

I agree that both parties are as bad as each other, and mainly concerned with their own self interest. However, I do think that things have been worse under Labour. Anyone earning above minimum wage is a cash cow to pay for their ballooning welfare bill.

I fully supported their proposed reforms to disability benefits - but of course the Labour back benchers blocked it.

I have voted Labour in the past, I’ve never voted Tory, but at the moment I think that the Tories have the better leader.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 19:25

RichardTice · 24/03/2026 19:12

Means test pensioner benefits as a first start.

Slowly fizzle away the state pension to get to a system where we all privately save, invest and plan for retirement. Those who've paid in get a lump sum back to do as they please.

The issue with the above & I agree pensioner spend is a problem is they are a large cohort. The majority of people vote on their own interests so I can’t see much changing.

Bist · 24/03/2026 19:25

dinbin · 24/03/2026 19:09

This. I don't know what people are expecting

miracles apparently.

How on earth can any gov slash welfare spending with an ageing population?

By scrapping the triple lock, obviously.

EasternStandard · 24/03/2026 19:25

Pineneedlesincarpet · 24/03/2026 19:18

I agree. But Labour have made it impossible for people to get jobs. So as to create a voting base that needs to come cap in hand to them.

This might help them get votes but it’s a sinking ship economically. I agree with you that it’s such a bad idea.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 24/03/2026 19:25

PandoraSocks · 24/03/2026 19:21

We all know why the Red Wall turned blue in 2019. Brexit. But why didn't the Tories hang on to it in 2024 if immigration was the key? Why didn't the Red Wall become the Reform wall?

I think at the time the polls were showing that immigration was not the No.1 issue.

Brexit but also Jezza of course.

2024 the tories had caused the high immigration (along with Blair) by the Boris wave and Rishi had not got it under control at that time...the effects of their reforms are only being seen now. So the electorate had had enough and rememebr...Keir did say he was going to "smash the gangs". So people had some hope in Labour at that time. Not many as most people were voting against thr Tories.

Immigration has been a top issue for years. I thought Brexit went through because all Leavers were racists after all....??

BIossomtoes · 24/03/2026 19:26

However, I do think that things have been worse under Labour. Anyone earning above minimum wage is a cash cow to pay for their ballooning welfare bill.

Individual taxation levels are exactly the same as they were before the last general election.

PandoraSocks · 24/03/2026 19:26

hattie43 · 24/03/2026 19:23

I think only tax payers should have a vote .

So at least a million pensioners should lose the vote? Stay at home parents? Students?

Kirbert2 · 24/03/2026 19:27

I don't agree with all of Labour's decisions but I also couldn't imagine voting for anyone else. Especially the Tories and Reform so I imagine I'll stick with Labour.

I don't like the lot of them, to be honest.

Suzysinkingship · 24/03/2026 19:27

Pineneedlesincarpet · 24/03/2026 19:12

Some figures would be useful.regarding the amount of benefits claimants in July 2024 compared to now. And also some evidence regarding companies being unwilling to employ people for reasons other than Labour policies.

Edited

Benefits claims have risen steadily since UC and PIP was brought in and have continued to rise under Labour I was asserting they were any better than the Cons.

As for evidence of companies not wanting to employ folk who've been on benefits for a long time I don't think it really needs providing when it's simple common sense that as a private business you don't take on risks and costs of employing people who may or may not be reliable or trained.

That's not to say I think the current welfare system is fit for purpose as it need massive change but I really don't see private businesses focused on profit and efficiency helping much, it's easy for the media to say there lots of job vacancies but they always fail to highlight where they are and what they pay like the good old "picking fruit" which is seasonal and the fields are often in affluent areas that would appose the building of housing and the influx of "poor" people.

I wish I had all the answers but I don't and I find the whole thing a depressing mess tbh

BIossomtoes · 24/03/2026 19:27

PandoraSocks · 24/03/2026 19:26

So at least a million pensioners should lose the vote? Stay at home parents? Students?

Edited

Wait for it - “Oh no, not those non tax payers”.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 24/03/2026 19:28

BIossomtoes · 24/03/2026 19:26

However, I do think that things have been worse under Labour. Anyone earning above minimum wage is a cash cow to pay for their ballooning welfare bill.

Individual taxation levels are exactly the same as they were before the last general election.

That's Rachel Reeve's trick. Hammer everything apart from income tax. People can see through that fairly easily.

Bist · 24/03/2026 19:29

BIossomtoes · 24/03/2026 19:15

How much would that lump sum be? And how would the money be raised? It’s certainly what a political party that wished to commit electoral suicide might propose.

This is EXACTLY the issue though! Too many scared politicians thinking they’ll stick their heads in the sand and let the next government deal with it while the country gets ever poorer, and pensioners - the UKs wealthiest demographic- take an increasingly large wedge of the UK budget. It’s insanity. See also benefits payments to people with adhd who are perfectly capable of working - signed off for ever. If you don’t believe me watch that panorama on it. It’s staggering!

Pineneedlesincarpet · 24/03/2026 19:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 19:29

Bist · 24/03/2026 19:23

But you’ll agree that the welfare state is booming at a staggering rate and needs to be addressed, surely?

How much of the boom is due to an ageing population? An ageing population is a sicker one too.

People forget that one consequence of raising the state pension age is all those people who would fall into the pensioner category now fall into the “worker” category and increase the % of economically inactive & in ill health.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 19:31

BIossomtoes · 24/03/2026 19:26

However, I do think that things have been worse under Labour. Anyone earning above minimum wage is a cash cow to pay for their ballooning welfare bill.

Individual taxation levels are exactly the same as they were before the last general election.

It’s crazy that so many don’t seem to realise the Tories froze the tax bands.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 24/03/2026 19:31

Bist · 24/03/2026 19:29

This is EXACTLY the issue though! Too many scared politicians thinking they’ll stick their heads in the sand and let the next government deal with it while the country gets ever poorer, and pensioners - the UKs wealthiest demographic- take an increasingly large wedge of the UK budget. It’s insanity. See also benefits payments to people with adhd who are perfectly capable of working - signed off for ever. If you don’t believe me watch that panorama on it. It’s staggering!

If a leader needs to take massively unpopular decisions for the long term good of the country and is inured to abuse then I can't think of anyone better than Farage. He won't care. Hes used to abuse and has had it for 30 years.

Hoping for Kemi personally. But won't be distraught if Reform have to get in.

Chaffinch78 · 24/03/2026 19:32

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 19:33

Bist · 24/03/2026 19:25

By scrapping the triple lock, obviously.

@bist that’s not enough though, although I agree it’s the first thing I would do now.

RichardTice · 24/03/2026 19:33

BIossomtoes · 24/03/2026 19:24

In other words you haven’t got a clue. Fair enough.

• Don’t touch current pensioners or people close to retirement

• For younger people, freeze what they’ve already built up and stop adding new State Pension rights

• Make pension saving much higher and mandatory (not just the current auto-enrolment levels)

• Set up simple, low-cost default pension accounts for everyone (so people aren’t left to figure it out alone)

• Still have employers contribute a decent share

• Do it slowly over decades, not quickly

Bist · 24/03/2026 19:33

BIossomtoes · 24/03/2026 19:26

However, I do think that things have been worse under Labour. Anyone earning above minimum wage is a cash cow to pay for their ballooning welfare bill.

Individual taxation levels are exactly the same as they were before the last general election.

Tax bands have been frozen for years and Reeves has extended the freeze - this hugely increases the income tax we pay and we’re not even feeling the worst of it yet.