Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Aibu it's not the Government's role to bail people out?

222 replies

Katypp · 23/03/2026 07:57

The UK is massively in debt and money is short.
AIBU to think that families should be expected to manage their own household budgets instead of constant calls for Government subsidies every time prices go up?
It's coming up to summer. Surely it's not unreasonable to expect householders to manage their own bills by cutting back their energy use?
Surely adults could be expected to manage their own grocery bills? Obviouly covid was exceptional, but oil prices rising have happened many times before with no expectation of bailouts.
My question is, given the state of the economy, do we need to wean ourselves off expecting the Government to step in every time prices go up and learn resilience again?

OP posts:
Amiacoolorwarmcolour · 24/03/2026 05:40

It isn’t just a matter of ‘ cutting back.’
My utility bills would be quite low if it weren't for the standing charges. No matter how careful I am I can’t reduce those. It would be better if the government put a cap on how much profiteering utility companies can make. Other countries do this.
I don’t agree with certain people getting reductions on bills though. It’s never the working middle who are helped.
Why should working people always be the ones to suffer? How much more money do CEOs really need?

rosycheex · 24/03/2026 05:48

The Gov is borrowing money to pay this I believe just pushing more debt onto future generations we can barely afford the interest on borrowing as it is.

KatiePricesKnickers · 24/03/2026 05:51

rosycheex · 24/03/2026 05:48

The Gov is borrowing money to pay this I believe just pushing more debt onto future generations we can barely afford the interest on borrowing as it is.

Absolutely correct.
If the government is supposed to be involved in individual’s finances then people need to start paying a lot more in tax.

lena105 · 24/03/2026 06:05

Katypp · 23/03/2026 08:08

The banks were bailed out because not doing so would have been disasterous for the economy.
Giving households a £200 bung is not beneficial to the country as a whole.

maybe the 'too big to fail' should have failed. the banks never paid back.
they paid bonuses to themselves.
how about Thames Water?
how is that beneficial to the country?

dinbin · 24/03/2026 06:13

KatiePricesKnickers · 24/03/2026 05:51

Absolutely correct.
If the government is supposed to be involved in individual’s finances then people need to start paying a lot more in tax.

Edited

Essentially yes as the cost of living is never coming back down. Our taxes will only keep going up because of our ageing population.

Unfortunately years. of little growth & underinvestment has meant we now have no wiggle room.

Middlemiss · 24/03/2026 06:25

Rocky6 · 23/03/2026 17:57

YABU.

I do think the government should be helping out people with Oil heating, in the short term.

Heating oil is usually used because there is no option for gas, which would be subject to a price cap, so it makes that fairer.

Also, you can't buy just a little bit of oil, due to minimum orders, so users are looking at several hundreds more at once, with no pay-monthly option. People do plan and budget, but personally, I plan assuming 65p or less, not 1.40+.

Finally, people with heating oil are often in the far north of the country, where it is colder. When prices spiked, I reduced my thermostat to 16c and to two hours per day. The temperature dropped to 10c some days. It's up to about 16c now, but due to get colder next week.

I can absorb the cost, and also stand the cold. But I do think vulnerable and elderly people should get help. Even just over the next few months, and hopefully people will be able to save for next winter or prices will drop.

Agree. It’s easy to tell people to be resilient and budget wisely, but to have a 100% increase in oil just happen overnight is different.

I hear little mention of the difference in climate across the UK. I’m in the north of Scotland with no gas option so depend on oil. Apart from during rare heatwaves, my central heating is used all year round (much lower in the summer yes of course). Whenever I travel to the south of England I feel the difference, whereas locals say it’s cool I feel it’s lovely and warm. It’s just how it is. I bought 500 litres just before this illegal war, and will need to fill up again soon. That’s an extra £400 to find each time. Small mercy this didn’t all kick off in October with the coldest spell looming.

I think perhaps a scheme whereby priority support goes to those who need their 500 litres soonest. No idea how that would work but the price is so volatile that it is immediate help that is priority. I am sure most people using oil are already economising as I am, but there’s a limit and again where you live really does make another difference.

Middlemiss · 24/03/2026 06:30

Shakeoffyourchains · 23/03/2026 10:09

The UK government subsidizes the O&G industry to the tune of £17,500,000,0000 a year, the equivalent of £610 for ever household in the UK, all while O&G companies post record profits.

Maybe it's time to look it that since they clearly don't need all that extra help...

I’m interested in this - @Shakeoffyourchains do you have any more info?

rosycheex · 24/03/2026 06:37

If we’d kept oil wells running in the North Sea they’d be raking in a good profit due to the price jump and increasing greatly their tax payment to Gov coffers., they also would employ people who pay tax but no let’s cut off our nose to spite our face

Stnam · 24/03/2026 06:49

Hallamule · 23/03/2026 08:18

And how would that help the population? Less tax, less government spending and/or more national debt.

It would cut out the middle man. Currently, we give our money to the incompetent fools in government and they waste a lot and give some back to us. We are then grateful and reliant on them.

KatiePricesKnickers · 24/03/2026 07:02

Middlemiss · 24/03/2026 06:30

I’m interested in this - @Shakeoffyourchains do you have any more info?

The rest of the Gemini response is this:

Summary: If you count "tax breaks to help companies drill" and "lower taxes for people to heat their homes," the figure is roughly £17.5 billion per year. If you only count direct cash handouts from the government to oil companies, the figure is effectively zero. ”

WonderingWanda · 24/03/2026 07:04

Motomum23 · 23/03/2026 08:01

I'd like to see a cap on the profit fuel companies can make tbh rather than the government using our taxes to pay their stupid levelvprofits - what was BPs profit last year ?? 10bn?? And they tell us they'll have to raise prices - surely they could run at break-even for a year and STILL average £5bn profit a year over 2 years.

This is absolutely spot on!

mids2019 · 24/03/2026 07:11

It's the middle class who are going to be hammered by fuel price rises. The government are going to shell out a lot of cash to benefits claimants to subsidise bills and yes this is a bit falling as we are all going to be impacted. It's those just earning above any threshold the government puts in place that in reality will bear the brunt of this......

Damnloginpopup · 24/03/2026 07:35

GoBazGo · 23/03/2026 20:21

I didn’t think it was shit. But you did.

So do I.
The 80's were shit. I far prefer living now.

90's were good though. The country felt buoyant, optimistic, into the 2000s.

Government has been shit for the last ten years or more.

BiteSizeByzantine · 24/03/2026 08:16

FullOfLemons · 24/03/2026 00:11

Why do you say it is crap though ?

I recall universal agreement to this principle across the political spectrum in both the UK and wider EU ( … which we were part of at the time).

So what. I dont think we should pay if the banks knob about again. Which they will definitely do because what incentive is there not to?

Solutionssought2026 · 24/03/2026 12:45

BiteSizeByzantine · 24/03/2026 08:16

So what. I dont think we should pay if the banks knob about again. Which they will definitely do because what incentive is there not to?

They are already knobbing around they started knobbing around in 2020 whilst the rest of the world was struggling with this virus thing, their first thoughts were how do we kickstart the housing market and make a fortune out of the mugs again? Oh I know we let them off stamp duty which raises funds to help them survive this virus thing.

SeaShellsSanctuary1 · 24/03/2026 13:24

It is crazy to think that the public have been anything but resilient over recent years.

Very poor decisions by people in power at home and across the world have hugely negatively impacted people in recent years.

Economies only work well when there isn't much change.

I'm in my mid fifties and in a fairly fortunate position but never before have i seen such a constant barrage of attacks inflicted on people's incomes as in recent times

FullOfLemons · 24/03/2026 18:31

BiteSizeByzantine · 24/03/2026 08:16

So what. I dont think we should pay if the banks knob about again. Which they will definitely do because what incentive is there not to?

Oh I see now

You didn’t understand the point made by the PP

AmberTigerEyes · 26/03/2026 05:28

Itchthescratch · 23/03/2026 12:49

It's not a view that I alone hold. This article probably best reflects my outlook on the matter. It certainly isn't simplistic or about treating people as a homogeneous group. Quite the opposite in fact.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-behavioral-aspects-of-poverty/

🥴 Seriously? A 2003 commentary ( ie opinion piece) written about poverty research done in 1980 on urban US that found that poverty was associated with dropping out of high school, children of unmarried partners and less than full time work but portrays them as root causes rather than the associations they are. This antiquated opinion has been long discredited.

AmberTigerEyes · 26/03/2026 05:38

rosycheex · 23/03/2026 19:08

What the Gov should be doing is getting people back to work- that’s where money should be going - the neets, those on benefits, the over 50s no one wants to employ, the anxious and depressed - they don’t even mention this in all their pandering to this group or that group or Trump. FGS get people working and the country cleaned up and don’t make employing people any harder!!!!!!!!!

Edited

You would need to magic up 1.2 million jobs out of nothing to do this.

There are 2.6 unemployed people per job vacancy in the UK by the latest data available: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/jobsandvacanciesintheuk/march2026

This doesn’t even look at skills mismatch where the primary issue right now is we have many older and recent graduate unemployed workers that are over qualified for the zero hour, no-skill/low skill job vacancies.

In addition, despite advertising vacancies many organisations have implemented hiring freezes due to the uncertain economy. So while they are post job vacancies to refresh their CV bank they aren’t actually hiring anyone to fill the vacancy. The number of vacancies advertised is always a higher number than the real number of jobs available.

malificent7 · 26/03/2026 05:43

Well I think you are wrong. I woiuld expect any government to help those in need in times of crisis.
So many benefit bashers everywhere atm who would happily see people starve and freeze and who are convinced that single mums ( mostly) are cruising roundcthe Carribean 5 times a year on universal credit.

AmberTigerEyes · 26/03/2026 05:45

rosycheex · 23/03/2026 19:50

Persephone
Blooming heck - my point was people won’t die with very little heating which has been stated above.
But make sure you lay into a boomer when you can.
my life walking miles to school, no car, one bath a week, plain food, almost no holidays, limited medical care, was simple compared to what people expect now - I don’t live in a bubble and have children and grandchildren so see exactly what life is like for younger generations
but I’m sure you feel better for getting that off your chest

People do die with very little heating.
Loughborough University study into excess deaths caused by fuel poverty found that 120,000 people in the UK died in 2024 alone.

You mentioned heat being a fire in the living room. Left for heated buildings for school/work, then came home and had heat.

You did not have very little heating.

AmberTigerEyes · 26/03/2026 05:58

rosycheex · 24/03/2026 06:37

If we’d kept oil wells running in the North Sea they’d be raking in a good profit due to the price jump and increasing greatly their tax payment to Gov coffers., they also would employ people who pay tax but no let’s cut off our nose to spite our face

How do you keep an oil well running when all the oil has been extracted?

https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-nine-false-or-misleading-myths-about-north-sea-oil-and-gas/

”The North Sea is a “mature basin” where production has been falling for decades, because most of the oil and gas it once contained has already been extracted.”

Below, Carbon Brief factchecks some of the most common claims about North Sea oil and gas.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page