It’s visceral isn’t it ?The feeling of horror at crimes so heinous they are outside the comprehension of most of us; we want the perpetrator to be punished in as unpleasant a way as possible.
However, for the reasons well-articulated above, we don’t have the death penalty here, and I agree with that.
Prison is not a soft option and even among segregated prisoners there is a hierarchy, or what could be described as a lowarchy which will mean prisoners like Nathan Bennett will be considered the lowest of the low. If he has any understanding of this, he will be in continual fear of anything from his food being tampered with to the possibility of being assaulted or killed. Recent events have shown prisoners are not completely safe in prison but that’s a different debate.
Depending on where he is incarcerated, he may have to spend up to 23 hours a day in his cell on his own. Depending on his mental state he may be subject to increased surveillance.
I don’t think the Judge’s sentencing remarks have been published yet and I will be interested to see the Judge’s ‘calculations’. My visceral feeling is a life sentence would be appropriate, but the guidelines don’t allow for that. The issue between the physical and psychological taking of life is, again, another debate.
It is possible the CPS may appeal his sentence.