Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread gallery
15
MistressoftheDarkSide · 03/03/2026 09:39

Just came on to start a thread about this, so thank you !!

Hopefully this will help get a proper investigation going into how this whole case was conducted.

There are also allegations against other experts in the case, and the fact that another judge wrote to Goss about Evans expressing concerns about his practise as an "expert witness" should be taken more seriously.

OverlyFragrant · 03/03/2026 10:30

And he gave up his registration before the investigation was complete.
Not something you'd do if no case to answer.

mumofoneAloneandwell · 03/03/2026 10:34

Insane. People are just evil. Always.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 03/03/2026 10:58

I knew more would come out like this so I’m not surprised at all.

SeanutBrittleOnToastedCoral · 03/03/2026 12:28

Not surprised. People blindly trust experts. After seeing a so-called medical expert more in the witness box myself, I’m more sceptical.

BoxingHare · 03/03/2026 12:33

Comes as zero surprise.

After everything that's happened so far since reporting restrictions were lifted, I just expect this sort of revelation on a regular basis.

Is there anyone trustworthy involved in the prosecution?

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 03/03/2026 12:41

Colour me surprised.

Gettingbysomehow · 03/03/2026 12:43

There has got to be a review into the whole case and soon.

possomblossom · 03/03/2026 12:49

It is utterly shocking. I already thought there was, at the very least, reasonable doubt over the verdict in this case. Dr Lee et al's report; the actions of the hospital in its downgrade in terms of the babies they were allowed to care for; probable perjury by a doctor involved; and now the CPS's determination to hide the real doubts over Hindmarsh.
Even if her conviction is overturned and she is exonerated, there's no psychological recovery from this. Where could she live? What could she do? It's just awful. I write as the mother of a premature baby boy who died, aged 20 days, in a London hospital.
💔

Namingbaba · 03/03/2026 13:27

It doesn't look good. In general there does seem to be an issue with how to decide who is a worth "expert witness" and who isn't. It's hard for the police as the fact they need them in specialised cases like this means it's hard for them to know who to trust.

CommonlyKnownAs · 03/03/2026 19:30

Well well well.

But this is a structural problem.

Firefly1987 · 03/03/2026 20:10

The Guardian is pro-Letby and were responsible for the LIE about the post it notes being on the advice of a therapist which is now repeated as fact. Don't believe everything you read.

TheChickenOrTheMiniEgg · 03/03/2026 20:14

possomblossom · 03/03/2026 12:49

It is utterly shocking. I already thought there was, at the very least, reasonable doubt over the verdict in this case. Dr Lee et al's report; the actions of the hospital in its downgrade in terms of the babies they were allowed to care for; probable perjury by a doctor involved; and now the CPS's determination to hide the real doubts over Hindmarsh.
Even if her conviction is overturned and she is exonerated, there's no psychological recovery from this. Where could she live? What could she do? It's just awful. I write as the mother of a premature baby boy who died, aged 20 days, in a London hospital.
💔

I’m so sorry about your baby boy ❤️

I absolutely agree that it would be almost impossible for her to live a free life after this. The psychological damage but also how she’d likely always be hounded.

TheChickenOrTheMiniEgg · 03/03/2026 20:15

Firefly1987 · 03/03/2026 20:10

The Guardian is pro-Letby and were responsible for the LIE about the post it notes being on the advice of a therapist which is now repeated as fact. Don't believe everything you read.

Which bit of this don’t you believe?

ThatFairy · 03/03/2026 20:20

Such a strange case. I believe there is a high possibility she is innocent.

However, her note: "I killed them because I am not good enough to care for them" sits in my mind and it's confusing to make sense of.

Was it just a bad thought in her mind she wrote down when she was in a bad state of mind probably having a nervous breakdown over what was happening to her ?

Did she just write down a bad intrusive thought under pressure ?

It's very hard to make sense of

Rhubarbandcustardd · 03/03/2026 20:27

Firefly1987 · 03/03/2026 20:10

The Guardian is pro-Letby and were responsible for the LIE about the post it notes being on the advice of a therapist which is now repeated as fact. Don't believe everything you read.

Yes, this would have been uncovered in the first two appeals wouldnt it? If it was significant or are the timings wrong

I believe the insulin evidence as it stands so to me not really ground breaking or changes anything

agree the guardian are not impartial

CommonlyKnownAs · 03/03/2026 20:31

It would be helpful if those criticising the Guardian could tell us what they object to in this specific article.

decorationday · 03/03/2026 20:32

Firefly1987 · 03/03/2026 20:10

The Guardian is pro-Letby and were responsible for the LIE about the post it notes being on the advice of a therapist which is now repeated as fact. Don't believe everything you read.

Would you stop spreading lies?

decorationday · 03/03/2026 20:32

CommonlyKnownAs · 03/03/2026 20:31

It would be helpful if those criticising the Guardian could tell us what they object to in this specific article.

They can't.

RedBlocked · 03/03/2026 20:33

ThatFairy · 03/03/2026 20:20

Such a strange case. I believe there is a high possibility she is innocent.

However, her note: "I killed them because I am not good enough to care for them" sits in my mind and it's confusing to make sense of.

Was it just a bad thought in her mind she wrote down when she was in a bad state of mind probably having a nervous breakdown over what was happening to her ?

Did she just write down a bad intrusive thought under pressure ?

It's very hard to make sense of

Edited

Even if it wasnt written on the advice of a therapist it sounds like something a very distressed (but innocent) nurse might write.

Feeling guilty about not being a good enough nurse or carer or spotting signs fast enough.

I recall a past unexpected family bereavement, lots of people gutted.

A lot of people were feeling guilty and thinking IF we had done X, things would have been different, the person was let down, we somehow betrayed them.

If we had just done this, or seen this small medical sign...

We all felt it.

It was totally illogical and irrational given the circumstances.

None of us were medical professionals or was caring for the person at the time. Or even physically present

But it was a way of processing and trying to control extreme grief and shock.

ColdWeatherWarning · 03/03/2026 20:43

This whole case stinks like a rotten kipper.

It's honestly impressive, pretty much every piece of 'evidence' or aspect of the police investigation has been shown to be bollocks.

This will definitely be used as a "what NOT to do" case study in future.

ThatFairy · 03/03/2026 20:45

RedBlocked · 03/03/2026 20:33

Even if it wasnt written on the advice of a therapist it sounds like something a very distressed (but innocent) nurse might write.

Feeling guilty about not being a good enough nurse or carer or spotting signs fast enough.

I recall a past unexpected family bereavement, lots of people gutted.

A lot of people were feeling guilty and thinking IF we had done X, things would have been different, the person was let down, we somehow betrayed them.

If we had just done this, or seen this small medical sign...

We all felt it.

It was totally illogical and irrational given the circumstances.

None of us were medical professionals or was caring for the person at the time. Or even physically present

But it was a way of processing and trying to control extreme grief and shock.

She said, I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough to care for them- maybe she was just angry and writing down what she was being accused of

Blueyshift · 03/03/2026 20:47

It appears Himdmarsh reported colleagues who were giving "gender-affirmation hormones" to children under the age of 16 and without an assessment.

He was against this. Nothing to do with the insulin. That still stands. It's why BM didn't push it.
Think I like Hindmarsh even more.

Blueyshift · 03/03/2026 20:48

decorationday · 03/03/2026 20:32

Would you stop spreading lies?

This is not a lie. Letby didn't even say this herself.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread